Bill
@BillAckman, the offset to your thesis is that raising rates will have a profoundly adverse impact on residential real estate - which "hits above the belt" because of its multiplier effect.
Already 30 year fixed rate mortgages are 7.5%.
A move to 8% or higher will be punitive - to the homebuilders, remodelers and suppliers (
$HD), furniture companies, appliances, discretionary spending ( like travelling) and rein in lending at consumer-based real estate heavy banks and finance companies.
Then there is rollover risk (of loans coming due put on in a zero interest policy backdrop). Perhaps that explain, in some measure, the weakness in private equity share prices in the last month...
@dougkass @SeabreezeLP
The presumption that the Fed raising short-term rates reduces inflation is predicated on the belief that higher rates reduce demand and investment.
But what if higher rates don’t reduce demand and investment because the demand for intelligence and energy is unaffected by higher rates because winning the race for super intelligence has a near infinite ROI and the demand for compute will remain incalculable.
Why won’t higher rates at this unique moment in history therefore lead to more inflation as interest costs are embedded in everything?
And the problem is compounded as the more the Fed raises rates, the more inflation we will have and the more the Fed will need to raise rates further and so on.
But what if the old models don’t apply to the current paradigm and the Fed is wrong?
I think the Fed might have just made a mistake. Am I right or am I wrong?