@PoliceScotland Please have a word with this woman @authenticTERF She clearly has issues! 😬 I am not responsible for the accusations she's levelled at me.

It is so very upsetting to think that if the police had acted correctly over the attack on Nigels home Anne might still be alive. We need answers as to why the investigation was dropped. Who took the decision and why?Was their political pressure put on the police to stop and why did the MSM and the BBC not report the attack as an important story? Any other political party leader and it would have been headlines

Filthy b@stard! 🤬

Thinking today about what happened in Israel on October 7, three years ago. Jews hunted-down, gang-raped, burned alive, beheaded. Babies and elderly alike. For no other reason than they were Jews. I keep being told Israel ‘over-reacted’. By fighting back against a war of extermination it didn’t start? As a Christian, who was formerly based in Jerusalem as a journalist, I always considered myself a friend of Israel. Now, having spent the last three years watching a wickedly contrived attempt to forget what really happened on October 7, and in spite of anything our Green Party says, I’m proud to call myself a Zionist.

7/10/2023 🤍

RT @IDF: @Reuters , seems like you’ve conveniently forgotten how we got here, here’s a little reminder. View of southern Israel during th…

RT @joshxhowie: Palestinianism. And it’s coming for the UK.

The execution of Nidal Hasan by firing squad will take place at Fort Hood, Texas on Thursday, December 3rd, 2026, at 1 p.m. CT.

Kibbutz Nir Oz. 85% of houses destroyed three years ago. 69 residents killed including the Bibas babies. 23 members are back. In the background is a new beautiful home where one of those who was kidnapped now lives. Jews have survived and rebuilt our lives for thousands of years. Am Israel Chai.

17 Years! Is that all! JFC. 🤬

"Man charged with GP's murder." That's the headline the BBC chose to run with for this heinous story. The man is Mark Cain and the GP is Dr Hannah Terry, also known as Hannah Cain, his wife, who was found dead at their home. The article never once mentions the man is her husband. Yet another example of this farce of an organisation burying the relationship when a woman is killed by the man she lived with. R.I.P. Dr Hannah Terry. 💔 bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c64g…

"Imagine telling your daughter, sister, wife or mother that if she objects to undressing in front of a man at work, she is the one who must leave. That was our reality.” Powerful full speech from President of the Darlington Nursing Union, Bethany Hutchison, at the 'When Reality Meets NHS Policy' Conservative Party conference fringe event

Exactly 3 years ago, our countries’ history was forever changed. We will never forget the horrors of the Oct. 7 Massacre.

Three years since October 7, 2023. We remember the lives stolen by Palestinian Hamas. We honor the heroes. We carry the scars. And still, we stand. We rebuild. We live. We choose hope. Am Yisrael Chai. 🇮🇱 #UNFORGO7TEN

It's sickening. Life, or the death penalty.

Palestinians Finally Granted Own Country buff.ly/XY6GBXk

ALL of this sickens me. He shouldn’t have been here in the first place. Clearly. But that’s a failure for our border controls. The fact that he can’t and won’t be deported is unfathomable. Again one for the authorities. As for justice. This vile vile creature should NEVER be held as an ‘indefinite hospital patient’ He is a vicious and deranged murderer who’s enabled manipulation of our criminal justice system to get away with it. Once again a lazy CPS and utterly misguided ‘expert Doctors’ These orders are anything BUT indefinite. If the public knew this there would be outrage (and fear). What are our judges doing?? 8 out of 10 are free within 10 years. The cost to the uk taxpayer for him will be millions….

Let’s start with Britain’s borders, shall we? Cat got your tongue?

The Evidence Wasn't Deleted. So Publish It For months, the government's answer to who shaped its new definition of anti-Muslim hostility was simple: the evidence was gone. It never was. Will Garton, director general at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, has confirmed in writing that more extensive searches, including technical work by departmental IT specialists, found that "the underlying Call for Evidence response dataset is still held on Departmental systems." Nick Timothy was first told the material wasn't held. He kept pushing. The department eventually discovered that it was. This isn't some incidental pile of correspondence. The government's own published account calls the working group's evidence gathering "significant" and says the Call for Evidence "forms the basis of the definition that the government is now adopting." If this evidence underpins a definition ministers want organisations across Britain to use, the public has an obvious interest in knowing who submitted it and how it shaped the outcome, personal data protected where the law requires. Questions about the process predate the dataset reappearing. Rayner appointed Dominic Grieve to chair the supposedly independent group despite Grieve having written the foreword to the 2018 APPG report proposing the earlier Islamophobia definition. Akeela Ahmed, a panel member, had publicly championed that same definition. Harder to find among the five members is any voice for the free-speech or secularist case. Sir John Jenkins, a former ambassador the group approached, refused to take part, believing its direction already appeared predetermined. There's also a question ministers haven't properly answered. In June, James Cleverly asked specifically whether MEND, CAGE, the Muslim Association of Britain or the Muslim Council of Britain had submitted written evidence. The government replied that the consultation was open to everyone, that the department hadn't engaged with those groups, and that the working group hadn't met them. Cleverly hadn't asked who they'd met. He asked who had submitted evidence. That distinction matters. An organisation doesn't need to sit across a table from Grieve to shape an open consultation. It only needs to send a submission. That alone doesn't prove the process was captured, even though it might look that way. It does mean transparency matters more, not less, and the records now survive to provide it. Publish the submissions, redact what the law requires, and let the public see who tried to shape this definition. The deeper problem goes beyond Islamophobia. A department built national policy on what it calls a substantial evidence exercise. When an opposition MP sought the material, officials said it wasn't held. Only further pressure and a forensic search found it was. Garton's letter says ministers weren't involved in handling or retention decisions, so there's no evidence yet that ministers ordered anything concealed. There's every reason to ask how an official FOI process missed evidence important enough to justify government policy. The government can no longer claim disclosure is impossible because the evidence vanished. Its own director general confirms it survives. If the process was as rigorous as ministers maintain, publishing it should only prove that. If it wasn't, the public deserves to know that too. The question was never really where the evidence went. It's why, now the government admits it still has it, the country still isn't allowed to see it. "Rayner appointed Dominic Grieve to chair the supposedly independent group despite Grieve having written the foreword to the 2018 APPG report proposing the earlier Islamophobia definition."

Will be two types of event tomorrow to mark the anniversary of 7th October: 1. Commemorations. 2. "Protests". With 364 other days in 2026 from which to choose, "protests" on 7th October will not be protests. They will be grotesque "celebrations". No one should be in any doubt.

When the Met Police say they can’t do something, what they actually mean is they won’t do something. For instance: “we can’t stop a march by Muslims in London to celebrate their torture and murder of innocent Jews on October 7th” vs “we can shut down the whole town of Gosport to stop white English far right scum from looking at arriving Muslim illegal immigrants in a nasty way”.