Yes. @cafreeland should be in jail also.

The Edmonton-Strathcona MP is sending residents a letter that says, in part: “The questions posed in this referendum seek to divide Canadians based on where they were born. They seek to deny some of the most basic human rights, including access to healthcare and education, to people who came to Canada looking to build a better life for themselves and their families. Hate is not the answer to our problems.” Asking citizens questions in a referendum is not hate. It is civic engagement. Telling people their vote will deny others basic human rights is fearmongering. How does an elected official get away with misleading Albertans like this? And if taxpayer funds were used to send this letter, why are taxpayers paying for it?

NYT’s own reporter just walked CTV through how the Carney sit-down actually went They asked him, on the record, whether U.S. military force against Canada had even crossed his mind in the last 18 months. He did not say “invasion” — that was NYT’s word. He paused three or four seconds, then said it would have been irresponsible not to look at the “extreme tail risk.” That’s banker-speak for: very unlikely, catastrophic if it happened, so you still model it. He refused to say what Canada actually did to prepare. Globe and Mail already reported simulation exercises in January Stevis-Gridneff said she wasn’t surprised he had thought about it — only that he said it out loud. She expects a lot of Americans waking up to the Times piece to be shocked. The paper has been trying to tell U.S. readers the Canada-U.S. relationship is now about anger, hurt, and a sense of betrayal, not just tariffs Why say it? She said Carney answers direct questions directly, wanted people to know he takes the risk seriously, and the universe of bad outcomes between the two countries has “vastly expanded” Same interview: diversify off Starlink, F-35 order under review, theory that the world is too dependent on the U.S. dollar, AI existential risk “above zero” Looking forward to seeing the full transcript at their earliest convenience @MatinaStevis

En USA, un streamer puteo a uno de Amazon pensando que no pasaba nada Pero el loco lo agarro y lo revoleo como si fuera de trapo kjj El amigo ni se animo a decirle nada

I started noticing a recurring theme in Mark Carney’s speeches awhile ago, so I went back through the record. 👀 June 9, 2025 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “a darker, more competitive world” June 17 — “this moment of transformation” / “a world where shocks are flowing across borders” June 25 — “upheaval in the international order” / “unprecedented pressure” July 1 — “a world fraught with turmoil and division” Aug. 27 — “in a more divided world” / “hinge moment in history” Sept. 5 — “The world is changing” / “This is not a transition, it’s a rupture” Sept. 8 — “not a transition, but a rupture” / “economic uncertainty” Sept. 11 — “not a transition. It is a rupture” Sept. 18 — “in a divided world” Sept. 22 — “rules-based order is eroding” / “This is not a transition; this is a rupture” Sept. 23 — “the world is undergoing a fundamental shift” / “This isn’t a transition, it’s a rupture” Sept. 24 — “The world is changing rapidly” / “today’s divided and dangerous world” Oct. 10 — “an increasingly dangerous and divided world” / “a rupture” / “a rapidly changing world” Oct. 16 — “increasingly dangerous and divided” / “This is not a transition; it’s a rupture” / “a rapidly changing world” Oct. 17 — “a rapidly changing world — one that’s more divided, more uncertain” / “these upheavals” Oct. 27 — “The world has become more dangerous and divided” / “The old world order is in the past” Nov. 1 — “uncertainty” / “The old world… is in the process of disappearing” / “In an uncertain world” Jan. 20, 2026 — “a rupture in the world order” / “the beginning of a harsh reality” / “We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition” Jan. 26 — “The rapidly changing world” / “a cloud of uncertainty and worry” Feb. 17 — “the world has changed” / “a more fractured and darker world” Mar. 26 — “the world has changed” / “an increasingly dangerous and divided world” / “a more fractured and darker world” May 14 — “a rapidly changing world” / “uncertainty casts its heavy shadow” May 20 — “In an uncertain world” / “In a rapidly changing world” June 14 — “a rapidly changing world” / “more dangerous and divided” / “moment of rupture” June 25 — “a rapidly changing, more volatile world” July 1 — “a more dangerous and divided world” July 2 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “The world is more dangerous and divided” July 6 — “a more dangerous and divided world” / “History is back with a vengeance” July 16 — “a more dangerous and divided world” — repeated multiple times July 29 — “an increasingly divided and dangerous world” Sept. 15 — “The world has changed” / “an uncertain world” / “a world undergoing a rupture” / “an increasingly uncertain world” Different venues. Different subjects. Same vocabulary keeps returning: Dangerous. Divided. Darker. Fractured. Uncertain. Volatile. Upheaval. Rupture. 🌎 So what do you think he’s trying to get across with this recurring message? Is it simply how he sees the world right now — or is there a broader purpose behind repeating it so often? 🤔 Curious to hear how others read it. #MarkCarney #cdnpoli #Canada