FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 25, 2026
Libertarian Party of New York Statement on Dutchess County Withdrawal of Support for Flock Cameras
The Libertarian Party of New York commends the residents of Dutchess County who showed up, asked hard questions, and refused to accept a countywide license-plate dragnet as the price of “public safety.”
Today’s announcement that District Attorney Anthony Parisi and Sheriff Kirk Imperati are withdrawing support for continued use of Flock Safety technology is not a gift from Albany. It is the result of residents packing community forums, reading contracts, mapping cameras, and insisting that public trust is not optional. Sheriff Imperati put it plainly: public safety depends on public trust. Dutchess residents made that principle impossible to ignore. (Daily Voice)
That work did not happen in a vacuum. Dutchess County Libertarians and their neighbors organized locally, showed up at town halls, and kept the pressure on after cameras appeared on private land, after a town contract was quietly signed, and after a real-time crime center began vacuuming plates by the hundreds of thousands. Milan’s vote to temporarily ban this class of surveillance on town property was a first in the county. That is liberty from below.
LPNY is proud of the Dutchess County affiliate and of every New Yorker who used
deflockny.org to find the cameras on their street, learn who operates them, and tell their officials their thoughts and concerns. Get involved locally:
dutchesscountylp.org |
lpny.org/affiliates/dutchess.
“It is quite evident that the overwhelming opposition to Flock camera and ALPRs in general is a uniting issue in Dutchess County, bridging various party lines. It is great news that our DA, Sheriff and members of the Legislature have pulled their support for these violations of our rights. While it is a good first step, we will continue to monitor the actions of the County government and show up to keep them accountable.”
— Rob Cocomello, Chair, Dutchess County Libertarian Party
Automated license plate readers do not wait for a warrant. They do not need suspicion. They log plate, vehicle, time, and place, and the network lets agencies far beyond the county search that record. One camera is a picture. A county of them is a map of daily life. Residents treated that as a political fact, not a technical footnote.
This is not a Dutchess-only problem.
Yesterday, The Intercept reported that Flock’s real footprint is far larger than the company has advertised, and that Flock is now trying to take down the most detailed public map of it. Flock has told the press it operates more than 120,000 cameras nationwide. A map published by cybersecurity researcher Joshua Michael, built from Flock’s own location records, shows more than 170,000 cameras plus more than 130,000 accompanying devices, about 300,000 Flock surveillance devices across the United States. That map was cited in a Senate hearing the same day. Flock has since moved to have the site taken down. (The Intercept)
A vendor that sells warrantless tracking to local government should not get to decide whether the public can see where the hardware is. Dutchess residents already learned that lesson the hard way: cameras on private land, incomplete official maps, and a network that does not stop at the county line. New Yorkers should keep mapping what officials will not.
See a camera. Send the tip.
If you spot a new reader, a pole that was not there last month, a quiet vote, a private-property install, or misuse of the system, send it to tips@deflockny.org. You can also use the tip form on
deflockny.org. They review tips the same way either way. They do not publish who sent them. A mapped camera is harder to hide. An unmapped camera is how these networks grow one town at a time.