My last pinned tweet.

ICE cuts off power to house full of kids—break in glass windows with no warrant. "I was at home with my 1 year & 5 months old baby," mom said. "And I'm 6 months pregnant!" Agents finally turned power back on after 3 family members arrested. But leave mom & kids behind with no way to safely lock up the house with the front windows still broken. "I was so scared to post these videos, but not anymore!" mother said. "I want families, friends, and everyone else to see what cruel people ICE are." Incident occurred inside a home in Palm Beach, Florida. She doesn't have an active account on this platform—so posting first full length, English language, and credited video here to help raise awareness.

It’s really insidious how she manipulates history. She’s leaving out a key detail. The most starved and emaciated Jews in death camps were called “Muselmänner” by prisoners because they were so weak that they could only silently lie on the ground — resembling a praying muslim

Firing from civilian infrastructure? WAR CRIME. Firing without uniforms on? WAR CRIME. Firing indiscriminately? WAR CRIME.

Israel is killing innocent unarmed Palestinian children in Gaza.

Amazing. France can DEPLOY SOLDIERS and AIR DEFENCE to shoot down the SAME shahed drones used against Ukraine to protect infrastructure in Saudi Arabia. But Ukraine's critical infrastructure and CIVILIANS? Noooooo. Not worthy.

The cattle ranchers voted for Trump in part to crack down on illegal immigration - now they're complaining about ICE raids

absolutely insane for @nytimes to not mention howard lutnick's involvement in russian sanctions evasion

Why doesn't the UN address this ⬇️ What the return of students to elementary school in Gaza looks like..

RT @BanquoDyar: Reduce the number of Congressional staffers and pay them better. Elected normie Dems need to stop getting their staffers…

Weird that Nick Kristoff's blockbuster rape dogs report had zero follow ups from the news desk at the New York Times or, for that matter, any other media outlet. The story was widely shared as true and then buried and never spoken of again.

They know everything about Jeffrey Epstein. GIFT link. wsj.com/us-news/law/federal-…

Let me get thid straight- You want to run a very old man then have him pass the torch to his VP? DO I HAVE THAT RIGHT????

I'd encourage everyone to read the Danish military intelligence assessment in full, and not rely on excitable social media upsums. Here is the top line: "The Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS) assesses that Russia will intensify its hybrid war by carrying out more frequent attacks against the West and NATO, with greater consequences for the targeted countries than in the past. This could include destructive cyber attacks that cripple critical societal functions as well as sabotage attacks that carry a high risk of casualties." In other words, Russia will continue doing what it's already doing (terrorist attacks against hard and soft targets, cyberoperations), only more so. This is an uncontroversial assessment across Western intelligence services, so far as I've been able to determine. DDIS continues: "At the same time, there is a low but growing risk that Russia will launch a limited military attack against one or several NATO countries bordering Russia....Such a limited military attack could take the form of isolated strikes with long‑range weapons on infrastructure that is vital to the support to Ukraine. In this situation, Russia might then claim that the weapons only struck NATO territory because they were jammed by Ukraine. It could also be a so-called false flag operation, where Russia uses Ukrainian‑made drones to attack a NATO country." The scenario envisaged here (a low but growing risk) is a plausibly deniable conventional attack by Russia. The objective would be twofold. First, to sow panic and confusion in the targeted country or countries, and encourage skepticism of the official government version of what just happened. "Maybe it was the Ukrainians." "Maybe it was an accident." "Maybe no attack took place and the deep state is trying to foment World War III." Thirty seconds on this hellsite should be enough to convince you that counterfactual narratives would be easy enough to amplify, especially in countries with elections forthcoming. A "limited military attack" psychologically would just be a heightened form of "hybrid" war because it's designed to overwhelm and demoralize the population and make its think that supporting Ukraine just isn't worth it since those not at war are now liable to become collateral damage. The second objective of such an attack would be to gauge NATO's response to it -- and this is key bit, because, as DDIS also states: "Russia will likely carry out military attacks only if it assesses that such attacks will not result in a war by triggering a collective NATO military response. However, Russia is likely uncertain about what could trigger such a war. Consequently, there is a risk that Russia assesses that the NATO countries will not respond collectively, especially if Russia assesses that the United States cannot or will not support the European NATO countries in a potential war against Russia." (Italics added.) You wouldn't be wrong to detect a hint of political messaging here. (All intel services deny they do any such thing but they all do.) This is Denmark, a country that just stared down a possible U.S. invasion and annexation of Greenland, which would have meant the disintegration of NATO. Trump has spent his entire second term (and much of his first term) doubting the Inviolability of Article V. His Pentagon has given NATO allies questionnaires to fill out to prove their worthiness as allies, while it undergoes a force posture review with ominous media leaks about what Bridge Colby and his minion might do (25,000 U.S. troops withdrawn, a scuppered U.S. base in Poland, etc.) Now comes a frenzy of intelligence reporting across Europe about a possible Russian attack on NATO, all kickstarted by a CIA briefing delivered to the Poles, Scandinavians and Balts months ago with a warning that they're probably on their own if and when such an attack happens. Never let a good crisis go to waste... Russia isn't sure what would trigger a war with NATO, so how might NATO make it sure? A "limited military attack" can be deterred if Washington telegraphs its intent to enforce Article V in word and deed by stating clearly and repeatedly what would constitute a casus belli in 2026 and, of course, by keeping U.S. troops in Europe.

Funny how @KingAbdullahII failed to mention how Jordan illegally occupied the West Bank from 1948-1967, formally annexed it in 1950, and ethnically cleansed the territory of Jews in the Old City of Jerusalem. In all that time, they never created a Palestinian state. Then, in 1988, King Hussein, his father, stripped West Bank Palestinian residents of Jordanian citizenship overnight, another illegal move. Now King Abdullah comes to the UN lectures about “de facto annexation” and international law? King Abdullah doesn’t want you to know that that reason they didn’t declare a Palestinian state (and the reason Egypt didn’t either when they controlled Gaza), is because there was never a national identity known as “Palestinian” in the Arab world. This concept only developed with the PLO and Yasser Arafat in the 1960s.

This is a sweeping national embarrassment.

Every hit helps Democrats win who can then help Ukraine!

1/6 WATCH THIS. Nick Kristof is challenged at Harvard over his infamous “dog rape” column. He doubles-down: MULTIPLE dog rapes on numerous Palestinians, all confirmed by human-rights groups. We traced the “independent” sources and found the same grotesque story reappearing under different names. 🧵

After being fired by @KPMG for calling a Jew a “Zionist pig,” Yuen Lee started a GoFundMe for “monthly bills, groceries, childcare, and legal costs.” She’s entrusted the $104,000+ to Mohammed Khan, an influencer infamous for displaying “F**k the Jews” at Barstool Sports Philly.

Thanks to cricketgate, I looked it up and Planned Parenthood is refusing to endorse Mary Peltola against an incumbent senator who wants to ban abortion. I won’t use any colorful language to describe the decision-making here but it’s not good.

BREAKING: New polling shows Josh Shapiro leading his Republican opponent by 21 points. It's not even surprising anymore how badly Shapiro is crushing his Republican opponent. Democrats could learn a lot from Shapiro.