Zia’s video treats his reading of the law as settled fact.
Digitally altering a passport image for an undercover job isn’t Identity Documents Act fraud.
Journalists being paid by ITV to infiltrate and canvass isn’t the RPA s.111 offence.
“Almost certainly altered results” is speculation, not proof.
Undercover reporting with deception is legal when it exposes public interest matters, like Reform candidates calling Asians parasites and black children animals.
Police decide crimes. Courts interpret statutes. You don’t. This is just yet another performance for the gullible.
STATEMENT:
Reform UK has reported ITV, its board, and its undercover reporters to the police.
Some of the crimes carry up to 10 years in prison.
They forged a passport.
They directly interfered in elections and almost certainly altered the results. Being paid to “canvass” for Reform in crucial wards we lost by a few dozen votes.
They lied to a veteran about their service and left him “violated”.
This is unprecedented.
The police are now involved.
Scrutiny of political parties is one thing.
But anyone breaking the law to try and ruin the lives of Reform’s staff, members or volunteers will be reported to the police and pursued relentlessly in the courts.
Here’s what happened 👇