Libertarian/Free thinker. The free market defeats state coercion both in ethics and results. Eager to be blocked by more nannystate parasites that hate reality.

Texas, USA
Based in North America
What a ridiculous non-sequitur. Religious nutcases have always existed too, does that mean they’re god’s chosen? Bad ideas and deluded clowns will always be a part of the human equation.
1
20
Hahaha of course the intellectually lazy coward blocked me.
38
All he did was infer his daughter is pretty which is true, and Trump admitted to walking into the adult Miss USA changing room.
2
35
The amount of bad faith you just displayed makes you legitimately an awful person.
24
184
The changing consumer habits demographic.

ALT Canadian Lol GIF

5
303
“Not one comment” too bad you were called out on it.
1
51
No, you're not entitled to extra creature comforts just because you pearl-clutch and whine for it. Here are ways anyone can get free dessert goodies or other items without robbing others for it: Free food on restaurant apps, food banks, church giveaways, or spending remaining money you may have/receive beyond SNAP.
1
34
As I said in the comment you skipped: I live by a simple logical principal (Hitchen's Razor). It goes that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I can't prove or disprove god. Just as I can't for ghosts, aliens, demons, or the thousands of proclaimed gods out there. Again, "I can't explain X, therefore it must by Y" is unsatisfactory in meeting logical conditions. God falls squarely into the category of superstition if empirical evidence is not presented. You started the conversation affirming his existence, meaning the burden of proof is on you:
2
1
28
Oh, so when members of other faiths turn to Christianity it's the so-called right choice. But when Christians turn to other religions it's "they are confused." This is a fallacy known as special pleading. Basically, you're inventing your own special rules as you go along without having any real justification in doing so. I live by a simple logical principal (Hitchen's Razor) which is that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I can't prove or disprove god. Just as I can't for ghosts, aliens, demons, or the thousands of proclaimed gods out there. Again, "I can't explain X, therefore it must by Y" is unsatisfactory in meeting logical conditions. "There's proof all around you" is a non-sequitor. What am I looking at exactly? How terribly eyes are designed (evolutionnews.org/2023/05/is…), that most animals and plants can synthesize their own vitamin C but humans cannot, crowded teeth and poor sinus drainage due to our flat faces compared to other primates, ectopic pregnancy, and that's barely scratching the surface. If you're overly simplistic, you'll see a "watchmaker." Dive deeper, and the designs are barely suboptimal which does not bode well for a deity existing. Your particular brand of religion is nothing extraordinarily unique, and you're playing a lottery game mostly based time period, upbringing, and location.
21
That's an intellectually dishonest answer. It's amazing how you have no shame in peddling it. You're doing the meme:
2
38
You're definitely in your own delusional little world:
1
1
45
You have to be one of the most ridiculous tribalists I've run into in awhile. "Hear him grunt" is absolutely not an indication of anything, and is a weasel way to try to feed into an unsubstantiated narrative. Also, here's the flat palms you're so obsessed with:
1
18
Hoodlum: a violent criminal or troublemaker; a hooligan or gangster. Yes, absolutely I don't mind paying for Twitter. Imagine not understanding that time = money. Everyone here is just clout chasing. Period. So someone paying a measly few bucks per month to boost his or her engagement and entertainment is bad how? You're both a clown and a deeply disingenuous person.
29