Hey @PatrickMcHenry, you should probably give me a call at your earliest convenience. Thanks for your attention to this matter

Hey @TheRobbCarter you must be one of the most gullible people on the planet. Platforming con-artists and people with direct connections to counterfeiters @VirtuFinancial @DougieLarge and all the thieves behind $mmtlp,I’ll say gullible instead of fkn stupid to stay civil

Thank you @Beardvet for your service and support to expose for what the Biden administration’s @Sec did to #VETERANSforMMTLP #MMTLPARMY #MMTLP #MMTLPFIASCO #MMTLPprovesDJT @bennyjohnson we would be grateful if you’d pay attention to this.

If you're new to what @FINRA did to defraud investors, it's important to understand that the December 8th revision to the MMTLP Corporate Action wasn't a typo. FINRA overstepped their authority and forced Metamaterials to accept FINRA's version of the initial December 6th MMTLP Corporate Action that was centered on a "Effective December 13th" MMTLP Share Cancellation Date, but this made no sense because the same Corporate Action indicated that MMTLP needed to be held on December 14th in order to receive the Distribution/Pay. (image 1) If it was a typo and FINRA intended to put that they'd be "Deleting" the MMTLP "trading symbol" effective December 13th, here's the problem with this and the revised December 8th MMTLP Corporate Action... 1. The Corporate Action wasn't about FINRA deleting the MMTLP trading symbol. It was about a 1-for-1 MMTLP for Next Bridge Hydrocarbons "exchange" occurring on December 14th at Market close, at which time the MMTLP shares would be cancelled automatically. (image 3) 2. If FINRA made a typo, why didn't they bother to include the correct December 14th after Market close MMTLP share cancellation date and time? (Compare image 1 to image 3) The MMTLP Corporate Action was labeled an "Exchanged" Event Type Corporate Action. So compare it to other examples of Exchange Event Type Corporate Actions from both before and after MMTLP. (image 2) In the examples you'll see that the Corporate Actions are centered on the actual "EXCHANGE & SHARE CANCELLATION". Symbol Deletion is NEVER mentioned! 3. FINRA kept the "EFFECTIVE DATE" of both MMTLP Corporate Actions "00:00:00 12/13/22". But FINRA knew on, and well before 12/18/22, that the Exchange and MMTLP Share Cancellation was supposed to occur on 12/14/22 after Market close. 4. By keeping the focus on 00:00:00 12/13/22, which is basically 12/12/22 after Market close, FINRA attempted to conflate Symbol Deletion and Share Cancellation to create the illusion that they needed to protect investors from buying after 12/8/22. But brokerages made it clear that they were only planning to allow Position Close Only transactions on 12/9/22 & 12/12/22. (image 4) If there were short positions that needed to close, those were the days set aside for them to be closed. By U3 halting trading directly before the start of the 12/9/22 MMTLP trading day, FINRA protected their member firms from a potential short squeeze that might've occurred. Then, it wasn't in FINRA's first FAQ from March 2023, they waited until the second FAQ to admit that there were short positions that didn't close, but they downplayed the amount, and they've never repeated that estimate under oath. The FIF (Financial Information Forum) also communicated to the SEC that their members were unable to close their MMTLP short positions due to FINRA's U3 halt, but they did this in private and the SEC for some odd reason will meet with the FIF about the issue, but they won't meet with Next Bridge Hydrocarbons. Step in anytime! @VP @TheJusticeDept

I’m voting Red all they way Down the Ticket, now is not the time to be Fickle

This was an organized hit ☠️ nearly 4yrs ago by: 1. Wall Street broker-dealer lobby 👉FIF 👿 that used 2. Regulators @FINRA @SECGov to destroy an American company $MMTLP @nbhydrocarbons $MMAT and rob everyday investors. ⚠️The coverup is worse than the CRIME‼️ @POTUS @VP

Beard Vet was there! He knows the truth about what Trump said!

I found a typo of my own. (image 1) The other images are further proof that @FINRA overstepped their authority when they forced Metamaterials to accept FINRA's version of the MMTLP Corporate Action. The SEC is supposed to oversee FINRA but for some odd reason they haven't explained why FINRA was allowed to make all of these changes to a Corporate Action that didn't match what the SEC made effective on 11/18/22. @TheJusticeDept @FBILosAngeles

All right MMTLP community. I know there are some superduper people with DD skills in this community. Can someone help me connect the dots????? 😂 :):):):):):):):):):) Keep working!!! Be LOUD!! Let’s continue to get Greg McCabe’s interview out to the public. Forget the SEC and FINRA. They’re not gonna help us, we have FOIAs showing they are working AGAINST us and our company. Let’s go STRAIGHT to the BOSS MAN!!! People - as Kurtis says “Let your voice be heard. Let your thumbs be heard”. Let’s continue to ask for a meeting between President Trump @POTUS and Greg McCabe @nbhydrocarbons.

I asked AI based on Saltiel's position and his involvement, what would've been the likelihood of him seeing the results of @FINRA's blue sheet investigation into both MMAT and MMTLP... AI seems to think that the chances are "extraordinarily high". When you then consider that the Metamaterials Bankruptcy Trustee filed suits relating to Market Manipulation that occurred in MMAT, how is it that Saltiel, the SEC and FINRA didn't see it? Don't blame budget constraints and staffing shortages! The emails show that they specifically blue sheeted MMTLP and MMAT for the purpose of investigating fraud/manipulation. Are we supposed to believe that because the regulators didn't find anything that could be linked to the former CEOs, they just ignored the fraud/manipulation? How does that protect investors? Also, Citadel is one of parties named in the Metamaterials bankruptcy lawsuit. We've already seen the SEC side with protecting broker-dealers in the FIF communications, and we see that Saltiel left the SEC for Citadel funded TXSE. Is this just a case of "Nothing to see here!"? @FBILosAngeles @FBIWFO

Good morning 🦋 FYI - please make clear that the “bidders” including Authentix - are bidding on ownership of the adversarial lawsuits - meaning once they owned the adversarial complaints they would have total control on how they were litigated / or slow walked etc… essentially they are NOT bidding to own the technology - they are bidding for the opportunity to litigate ( or bury ) the trustees claims -

Oooo what could this be? Another promise from a man that truly keeps his promises! Can't wait! Thank you @Beardvet and @busybrands ! You're invaluable to this community! $MMTLP Not stopping until resolution. ♥️💪🙏 Make it so.

Formerly of the @SECGov's Division of Trading and Markets, David Saltiel’s position and movements carry distinct institutional significance when evaluated through the lens of market structure oversight and regulatory interactions... Direct Authority Over Market Mechanics: As a high-ranking official (serving as Deputy Director, Associate Director of the Office of Analytics and Research, and twice as Acting Director) within the Division of Trading and Markets, Saltiel sat at the exact regulatory intersection responsible for broker-dealer practices, clearing and settlement operational rules, and market surveillance systems. Proximity to Critical Turning Points: His inclusion in the December 2022 communications right before FINRA’s MMTLP symbol deletion, followed by direct engagement with broker-dealer lobbying groups (like the Financial Information Forum) regarding post-halt S-1 filings and unrecovered stock loans in late 2023, places him directly inside the administrative loop managing the fallout of the MMTLP/Next Bridge situation. The "Revolving Door" Dynamic: Saltiel's departure from the SEC to take on a senior leadership role at the Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE), an institution backed by major market-making entities and financial heavyweights like Citadel Securities highlights a pattern frequently criticized by market observers. Moving from a key regulatory seat governing market structure and clearing oversight directly into an exchange ecosystem funded by major industry participants underscores the close ties between regulators and the private financial entities they oversee. The "Bad Optics" of Regulatory Timing: When officials intimately involved in contested market events—such as handling broker-dealer fallout, disputed corporate filings, or communication loops with self-regulatory bodies—exit the agency right as administrative control shifts, it reinforces public skepticism. Even if routine career moves or political changes motivate individual exits, the proximity to unresolved structural controversies makes it look like accountability is being evaded, leaving outside observers with the impression of an agency closing ranks.

🚨🚨IF IT'S SO CORRUPT AND IT'S ALLOW TO CONTINUE WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU❓️❓️ It tells you that all the institutions and agencies that are supposed to be protecting investors THEY ARE ALL CORRUPT‼️ @PatrickByrne

Thank you RSBN and @BeardVet! This is 'uge! 🙏😎💛⚖️ #MMTLPTravesty

MMTLP For ALLOST 4 years, we thought the retail footprint was 65k. New data confirms it's 124,000 accounts double the impact, double the travesty. Now factor in the forensic estimates of OVER 1 BILLION SHARES in the system. The math is impossible. The human cost is real. BUT STILL ZERO TRANSPARENCY, AND ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY IT'S WAY OVERDUE. #MMTLP @VP @POTUS @SusieWiles47 @Beardvet @laralogan

MMTLP. POTENTIALLY THE BIGGEST FINANCIAL CRIME IN HISTORY. @VP @Beardvet @RSBNetwork @laralogan

These families have been forced underneath Bureaucratic ice for almost 4 years now! It’s time somebody did the right thing.

They also came after the 124K families of MMTLP when regulators U3 halted our liquidity and deleted our stock. 74+Congressional members signed on to demand answers and these regulators shut them down as well. We have been fighting almost 4 years demanding answers @POTUS