He says we need to define jobs AI and robots aren't allowed to do to protect work. But then says food, housing, and education won't be get better for 20 years because of regulations.
Food, housing, and education are like what one third of jobs?
It doesn't add up
One way to think about AI progress is not whether it crosses some benchmark of smartness, but whether it crosses benchmark's of real world accomplishments. I asked Astra to sketch out 5 economically important things we'd expect genuine AGI to be able to get done
You do not help the vast majority of Americans, including the middle class, by engaging in protectionism for the top 10%
Yes, the most skilled highest paid Americans should have to compete
open.substack.com/pub/agglom…
IMO, if we had dirt cheap college and healthcare, but manufactured goods were expensive and digital technology stagnant, we'd be hearing the same level of complaint just aimed at the other end of this chart.
He then admits we do spend a ton of money, but not dealing with root causes. So the problem is "politicians, journalists, and tech bros" DO support spending more money on this, but DON'T support "dealing with root causes".
And stopping high skilled immigration will fix that?
If you are looking for bad Acemoglu arguments, consider his criticism of skilled immigration, that it somehow is stopping us from improving the education of the bottom half or third of students???
Warning from the Auto News editorial board that the auto factory expansion is zero sum in the US when it comes to market share because the market is not growing.
autonews.com/opinion/editori…
Cutting wheat yesterday: roughly 100 grains harvested for each grain sown. In the 1300s on the Bishop of Winchester's manors, 5:1 was a good harvest, 3:1 a bad one. Thank you, Haber-Bosch nitrogen fixation and hydrocarbons, for feeding billions and sparing land.
Also no the US did not lend Telsa $465 billion, but $465 million. And no I don't think stakes of EV firms is a good idea. brie.berkeley.edu/sites/defa…
I am sorry but you cannot say that the unions we have couldn't have played a role in making an industry uncompetitive by pointing to the unions other countries have. Imagine saying well Japanese car companies weren't the problem, so US car companies couldn't be
Is the American path to the top — owning a private business — uniquely American?
New post: we see the same pattern in the UK, Germany, and Sweden. Germany’s top 1% is full of doctors, lawyers, car dealers, and ice cream parlors. Everywhere millionaires, everywhere.
Great post from @NateSilver538 but slightly puzzled by cost of living/affordability being the top issue even for the extremely liberal, but then his conclusion "the center-left’s pet issues — affordable housing, I guess? — don’t tend to appeal to people’s passions"
To me, this seems consistent with plant capital as sticky... can it really be the case that there are no changes to make?
inderscienceonline.com/doi/a…