I guess this is more a comment on Harris's political instincts than AI policy. IDK, it seems like a weird read of the mood for the former VP (and 2028 contender) to endorse a lobbying firm/comms shop embedded within a D megadonor's VC firm as the right way to mediate the debate.
Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
Sep 14
This is an encouraging effort to bring industry and government leaders together to pass the kind of sensible AI oversight we need. It is possible to heed the warnings of so many AI researchers and address safety concerns without sacrificing the technology’s benefits. But time is running out; the federal government must act quickly.

Sep 15, 2026 · 3:12 AM UTC

47
37
662
183,348
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @NateSilver538
Well, she is a political genius. She's the Michael Jordan of George McGoverns.
88
Replying to @NateSilver538
its the direction of the party
Barack Obama
@BarackObama
Sep 14
Replying to @BarackObama
So, we need to use this time to structure a more open, public and democratic conversation about AI. Building on the statements that the frontier companies have already made, some leaders in the space announced they’re launching what they call Project Blueprint to help tech companies and policy makers work together on setting stronger standards and guidelines for AI development.
5
1
32
3,417
Replying to @NateSilver538
Wait a second - are you implying she has bad political instincts?
1
33
1,739
Replying to @NateSilver538
The word salad lady is not known for being a critical thinker. It’s weird that you gave her that much of thought to be honest.
1
13
622
Replying to @NateSilver538
Nate, you’re making the classic mistake of treating Kamala Harris as a serious individual who knows what she’s talking about. Remember, she didn’t write this nor know what it means.
1
9
686
Replying to @NateSilver538
There isn't much 'spark' there, man! Dems will be better to find someone else.
6
549
Replying to @NateSilver538
This take is so off the rails though not surprised as it came from you. She called it “an encouraging effort “. Call it leadership or call it a voice of a concerned leader. It’s one voice of so many leaders in the AI industry who have spoken out about the need for oversight.
6
6
1,103
Replying to @NateSilver538
Nate you’ve become obsessed with being a contrarian take rather than being a reliable perspective OR the drink that stirs the straw. Congrats on being the 1N (policy debate burn).
6
750
Replying to @NateSilver538
She has terrible instincts but this isn't a great take. She didn't endorse anyone as a mediator.
4
584
Replying to @NateSilver538
Oh look, everyone: Two years later, smug punk Nate Silver has rediscovered his true vocation; attacking Kamala Harris. Time has not been kind to Nate's incel misfit brain -- does anyone even understand what the fuck he's trying to say?
1
3
1,111
Replying to @NateSilver538
Kamala is "business friendly" and always has been, just ask Lina Khan.
1
468
Replying to @NateSilver538
Listen to the Czar everyone
homans top guy
@passcoderonald
Sep 14
Finally an expert weighs in
2
448
Replying to @NateSilver538
2
239
Replying to @NateSilver538
Ohhh thank goodness Kamala Harris chimed in…I was waiting for her expert take on the subject she surely knows a lot about and is qualified to speak on 🤣🤣🤣🤡
2
997
Replying to @NateSilver538
she's not a contender for 2028. read the room!
1
373
Replying to @NateSilver538
They’re morons… they needs their marching orders. And it’s better to get the center majority leading than the main ignorant far leftists who come off as China agents. To be clear: Rs act the same on other issues.
88
Replying to @NateSilver538
If the allegations Andreesen made are correct -- this is in perfect alignment for Biden and Harris Those allegations were that those two wanted to basically anoint the companies who would be allowed AI development and all others would be barred
1
256
Replying to @NateSilver538
Why is it that you always have so many more words to say about whatever Kamala just said than you do for any other politician Like other politicians speak and you tweet about baseball, then Kamala comes along and you're like STOP THE PRESSES, SHE HAS SPOKEN AND I MUST CRITICIZE
47
Replying to @NateSilver538
Again, not someone that should be president. She needs to take a hike.
69
Replying to @NateSilver538
Well, at least she solved my personal problem if I would support her again for President - No. She is out.
108
Replying to @NateSilver538
Republican influence and interests are significantly more represented with other players. Why the (leveraged) double standard?
142
Replying to @NateSilver538
Certainly this problem will be solved with the intellect of Kamala Harris.
181
Replying to @NateSilver538
She’s out of touch. The most boring speaker I’ve ever seen. She doesn’t need to run
650
Replying to @NateSilver538
Hope you don't read these replies Nate. A lot of unhinged people out there. Note that most of your followers appreciate your opinions and your hard work... Even if we rarely engage. 😬
557
Replying to @NateSilver538
As long as it's not an R megadonor we'll be ok.
1
416
Replying to @NateSilver538
She’s a fucking idiot, let’s all be honest. Jfc.
6
156
Replying to @NateSilver538
She follows the script she’s given like everyone else. She isn’t a leader. Never was.
2
96
Replying to @NateSilver538
It's no weird when you understand she has no political instincts. Unfortunately. It's all consultants and advisors.
1
71
Replying to @NateSilver538
She did not write this
5
Replying to @NateSilver538
Uncanny
1
46
Replying to @NateSilver538
That’s a weird signal.
47
Replying to @NateSilver538
Kumbaya ain't gonna cut it. Laws with criminal restraints are the only way to get compliance.
73
Replying to @NateSilver538
Nate silver predicted Harris to beat trump. I wouldn't believe any polls this liberal puts out
2
Replying to @NateSilver538
Odd move for someone still leading the 2028 field. A YouGov survey last month put Harris at 25% of Democrats in a hypothetical primary, top of the pack. Reed Hastings already dropped $1 million into a pro-Harris PAC and now prefers Newsom, so the donor class is drifting.
259
Replying to @NateSilver538
1
86
Replying to @NateSilver538
Nate Silver think Barack Obama has bad political instincts apparently
42
Load more