I have thought a lot about the Clancy case, and I keep coming back to the same place. Three children are dead. Three innocent children whose lives were taken by the very person they should have been safest with.
I can have compassion for someone who is struggling emotionally or mentally. I can believe that a person can be deeply troubled, overwhelmed, and in desperate need of help. But, compassion for someone’s struggles cannot require us to forget the victims. Emotional struggles cannot become a common defense for killing innocent people. If we as a society dissolve that line, we are opening a door that will certainly lead to more victims.
Capital punishment was not the only option here. There is an enormous distance between executing someone and holding them criminally accountable for taking three innocent lives. Yet here we are with a hung jury, and I struggle deeply with the precedent and the message that sends. Somewhere along the way, the perpetrator has become the victim and society is asked to see her primarily as one who is suffering, while three children who can never speak for themselves risk becoming almost secondary to the story.
I also cannot help but wonder what message we are sending to the next generation. Justice has to mean something. Personal responsibility/accountability has to mean something. The lives of innocent children have to mean something. Can’t we be compassionate toward mental and emotional suffering without abandoning accountability for the choices people make and the lives they destroy?
I also cannot escape this thought: If those had been the jurors’ own children, I have a hard time believing that jury would have remained hung for very long. When you picture your own child in the place of those three little ones, the conversation changes very pretty dang fast.
My heart can break for a mother who was clearly struggling while still breaking first for the three children who lost everything. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Mercy matters. Compassion matters. Mental health matters. But so does justice. If emotional suffering becomes enough to excuse the intentional killing of innocent people, we we will have to accept that the consequences of that precedent will not end with this case.
Three children lost their lives. Whatever else we discuss, they should never become the afterthought.