Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @Reuters
Can’t hate the media enough
See if you can spot the difference.
1
24
232
6,548
Replying to @Reuters
35 million Americans live in poverty, but don’t worry, the billionaires are having another record year.
10
2
42
1,928
Replying to @Reuters
That is because we got rid of dementia patient biden and his corrupt criminal administration
4
5
237
4,962
Replying to @Reuters
Guess who gets to claim credit for THAT? 🤣

ALT Dance Winning GIF

1
8
147
2,804
Replying to @Reuters
But the socialists keep telling us we're poorer than ever- through messages sent from their MacBook Airs, received by college students on their cutting edge iPhones, while riding in the back of an Uber on their way to eat dinner at the trendiest new restaurant in town.
6
5
110
4,238
Replying to @Reuters
Thank you DJT!!
2
93
2,460
Replying to @Reuters
Americans don’t really know what true poverty is, even the poor here are far better off than the poor in a lot of other countries. Capitalism is by far the best economic system without question and has raised the standards of living for everyone.
3
47
1,298
Replying to @Reuters
No one lives in poverty in the US. When welfare is included as income the number living in poverty hits a statistical floor about 1%. These are inmates, institutionals, people changing classification, etc. The amount spent is 10x the actual income deficit. Fraud is ridiculous.
35
1,723
Replying to @Reuters
Are these cooked books? I think an audit is necessary.
23
30
6,389
Replying to @Reuters @DrunkRepub
The 2020 election caused permanent damage. 5 years now of high prices. They’ll never go down to pre American Rescue Plan and the dementia patient era
1
2
21
484
Replying to @Reuters
It's because we finally beat Medicaid.
1
25
919
Replying to @Reuters
Do I detect a tinge of sadness in Reuter's tweet? Are you bums doing all right, Reuters?
1
23
810
Replying to @Reuters @SebGorka
How much did you hate posting this knowing that it makes @realDonaldTrump look good? Must have been so tough for you.
1
21
533
Replying to @Reuters
Yeah 2025 goofy ass people still were doing good from biden. Best economy in the world post covid. Take a census for 2026 in 2027
32
2
16
4,367
Replying to @Reuters
I know it pained Reuters so badly to acknowledge this fact.
16
386
Replying to @Reuters
Poverty vs poor. Not the same
1
14
2,086
Replying to @Reuters
Remember when doomsday leftists said cutting bloat in the BBB would kill hundreds of thousands of people? If you get emotionally manipulated by a democrat it might be time to take a good hard look in the mirror.
3
11
2,346
What year of cost of living are they basing poverty level at? 2026 poverty level is about 60k as a family
6
9
1,251
Replying to @Reuters
Thanks to President #DonaldTrump and his #ForThePeople administration.
1
9
720
Replying to @Reuters
I don't believe it. Trump is cooking all the numbers and we all know it
11
8
863
Replying to @Reuters
Is this a result of the four years of Biden? Probably nothing to do with decreasing crime to the lowest level on record, no tax on tips, OT, SS, closed border, wages rising at the lowest part of the range, more manufacturing than we’ve ever seen. Nope. None of that. It’s got to be the Scranton kid.
1
2
361
Replying to @Reuters
Because they haven’t changed the poverty level to keep it inline with inflation
5
1,385
Replying to @Reuters
When housing has doubled this "poverty income" star means jack shit
1
3
763
Replying to @Reuters
@HouseDemocrats @SenateDems @AndyKimNJ @CoryBooker @SenBooker @AlexPadilla4CA @RepJayapal @PramilaJayapa @SenSchumer @RepJeffries Sorry for the low poverty rate again, oh and the increase in median income must be a real bummer. Don’t let your lies get in the way FACTS
4
943
Replying to @Reuters
YES and...... median household earned $87,460 in 2025, according to the Census Bureau. After adjusting for inflation, that is the highest number since 1967, when the federal agency began tracking the data.
3
557
Replying to @Reuters
US citizens only or inclusive non citizens as well.
2
1,992
Replying to @Reuters
Worth checking which measure a headline uses. Census publishes two: the official rate counts pre-tax cash income only, while the Supplemental Poverty Measure adds tax credits and in-kind benefits, then subtracts medical and work costs. The two can move in opposite directions.
2
574
Replying to @Reuters
half a brain and no common sense could still see this claim as ridiculous and absurd..if you belive the trump administration is putting out truthful statistics.. your IQ is -170
2
46
Replying to @Reuters
Amazing what happens when you stop counting something. It h just disappears!
2
467
Replying to @Reuters
Meanwhile, democrats caused 40 year high inflation when they had power and now want the American people to trust them again with power. Dont be fooled by their affordability arguments, they were the ones that caused the affordability crisis
1
136
Replying to @Reuters
I'm sure all the people struggling to make ends meet will be comforted by this.
1
78
Replying to @Reuters
Somehow you won’t credit Trump policies even though they’re the reason for this
1
218
Replying to @Reuters
Not thinking Socialism is the way to go…. CAPITALISM is working!!!!
1
1
2,246
Replying to @Reuters
It won't last... Poverty is always redefined, as soon as it's reduced, we change the measuring stick and manufacturer more of it.
1
795