Texas is paying premium contractor rates for ordinary white-collar work and losing visibility once those jobs enter the staffing pipeline.
Take TEA requisition 70127080: It’s a Business Analyst 3 role and the work is not remotely exotic:
Interview users, Write requirements, Create user stories, Make wireframes, Use Jira and Support the SDLC.
But TEA requires 8 years across a long list of overlapping BA skills - making it a “Level 3” BA role.
This matters because Texas’s contractor structure gets much more expensive as the level rises:
BA2 — $98.21/hr
BA3 — $127.59/hr
Meanwhile, Texas directly hires senior Business Analysts for roughly $26–$42/hr in salary, and some of those state roles involve work at least as complex as this TEA assignment.
I’m not arguing that contractors shouldn’t be purchased as a higher rate. Benefits, flexibility, payroll burden and vendor overhead are real, but this is not a reasonable premium.
Looking at the cost of labor - vendors recruiting similar Texas BA3 positions publicly advertise worker pay around $70–$90/hr.
So there may be tens of thousands of dollars per seat, per year, between what taxpayers pay and what the actual worker receives.
Then it gets stranger.
TechNix recruiters in India repeatedly advertise identifiable Texas-government jobs for TEA, HHSC and other agencies using the actual state requisition numbers.
For this exact TEA job: 70127080, one India-based recruiter posted:
“Only H1B candidate.”
Other recruiters carrying the exact same TEA requisition accept U.S. citizens, green-card holders, H-1Bs and other work-authorized candidates.
So the state does not appear to have required an H-1B worker, but someone downstream did. That is the part Texas needs to explain.
At a high-level, a Business Analyst can mean a lot of things. Some are deeply technical product owners working on complex integrations, Medicaid systems, security and enterprise modernization. Others are doing fairly standard requirements and process work.
Years of experience are not the same thing as complexity.
Yet Texas’s contractor system can move an ordinary BA role into a much more expensive tier simply by requiring 8+ years.
Then that expensive taxpayer-funded requisition enters a multi-layer staffing market, gets recruited from India, and in at least one case emerges as an opportunity restricted to H-1B candidates.
So the questions are pretty simple:
Why did TEA need 8 years for this job?
What exactly is Texas getting for $127.59 an hour?
What is the actual worker being paid?
Who is keeping the spread?
Why are Texas-government jobs being recruited from India?
And most importantly:
How can a taxpayer-funded Texas job end up advertised as “Only H1B candidate” when Texans were apparently eligible for the exact same requisition elsewhere?
This looks less like one weird recruiter and more like a procurement system nobody is auditing end-to-end.
@GregAbbott_TX I’m begging you. please address this - if you need help, just ask.