This is how an adult human head reacts to a .556 bullet. These 'doctors' want you to believe children's skulls in gaza are somehow left intact and the bullet, undeformed, never exits the skull. Every doctor who signed this piece should have its licence to practice revoked.
113
1,075
6,028
947,234
Has anyone heard a word from "Black Lives Matter" activists and organizations about Sudan and the massacre of civilians?!
1,072
10,776
45,867
711,523
🎗️Amihay retweeted
תמונה מדהימה וכה סימבולית מתחנת סבידור ברכבת לירושלים צילמה: יעל וייצמן עמרם
11
31
191
5,887
The massacre in Sudan is so massive that you can literally see bloodstains from space, visible in satellite footage. The Islamist-led ethnic cleansing is still raging on, relentless and unpunished. Where are the human rights activists??!
302
3,262
8,778
339,095
🎗️Amihay retweeted
Nearly 25 million people in Sudan are facing extreme hunger, and over half a million children have already died in a man-made famine caused by war. As Islamists commit a horrific genocide, the familiar moralist voices have fallen silent. Compare the scale of Sudan’s catastrophe to Gaza — and the debunked famine and genocide fabrications we were fed. Remember it next time one of these odious hypocrites cries for “Palestine.” Call them out. Every time.
202
1,444
4,270
167,466
In the late 1980s most Samaritans moved to Israel proper from Nablus near Mount Gerizim for protection from Palestinian violence. The ones who remain in the West Bank moved to a village called Kiryat Luza, the part of Nablus in Area B, also for Israeli military protection.
23
93
792
26,128
🎗️Amihay retweeted
While @RedCross issues a statement condemning Hamas for staging the recovery of an Israeli hostage's body, its own staff were at the scene watching this sick stunt taking place. Living hostages: the Red Cross didn't help. Dead hostages: the Red Cross is complicit with Hamas.
The International Committee of the Red Cross claimed to have no prior knowledge of Hamas staging the "burial" and "discovery" of deceased hostage Ofir Tzarfati's remains, calling the act "unacceptable." jpost.com/israel-news/articl…
165
2,881
9,381
311,805
Good morning, Daily archaeological artifact #5 The *Bulla of Gedaliah*, dating to the 6th century BCE, was discovered in the city of David. It bears the name "Gedalia Son of Pashhur" who is mentioned in the Bible (Jeremiah 38:1-4) as one of the opponents of Jeremiah.
15
75
308
5,676
🎗️Amihay retweeted
BREAKING: A father in Sudan sends a final message of goodbye before he is executed by Islamists. The silence over the mass-atrocities being committed by Islamists in Sudan is grotesque.
Mohanad
1,444
13,753
48,680
1,659,475
Islamist militants are killing women and children and terrorizing civilians. It is so heartbreaking to see loud voices on social media stay silent. Those who have been lecturing us on “genocide” for the past two years are suddenly out of words.
The Resonance
3,167
25,160
66,913
3,053,201
🎗️Amihay retweeted
Israeli Ch. 12’s Eretz Nehederet satirical comedy show — known as Israel's SNL — airs skit mocking Zohran Mamdani’s outreach to the Jewish community.
547
1,039
6,158
3,581,553
So Susan, allow me to introduce you to two ancient artefacts from the 9th century BCE. The first is called the Tel Dan Stele, which was an Assyrian monument inscribed in Aramaic, and it contained the first ever mention found to date of the “House of David”. It’s coincidental don’t you think that those “brainwashed” Jews would name a historical series after an actual 2800+ year old inscription? And then, there is a second artefact also dating to the 9th century BCE called the Mesha Stele, named after the Moabite King Mesha, which also contains the inscription of “House of David”. It’s even possible that there’s an earlier inscription called the Karnak Inscription, but until all scholars agree, we won’t include that 10th century BCE artefact for now. Interestingly, in all of archaeological history, there is yet to be a single artefact older than a 1920 British minted coin that ever mentions Palestine, or anything to do with the mythical 1960’s Soviet-created Palestinians. Do you think perhaps it could merely be that the Jews, the Assyrians and the Moabites cunningly plotted 2800 years ago to inscribe steles with the sole intention of pissing off a not-too-bright jihadist called Susan 2800 years later?
Hollywood's brainwashing is in full force. There's a new TV series on Prime called "House of David," meant to imply that the 70 year old jewish zionist settler colony in Palestine actually has ancient roots. These people are parasites.
321
1,674
7,510
344,712
🎗️Amihay retweeted
הנה מה שלא מספרים לכם על הבחירות במוסדות הלאומיים. המינוי של יאיר נתניהו, אדם שברח מהארץ בזמן המלחמה, לא נקף אצבע כדי לסייע למדינה ועסוק בהזרקת רעל לעם ישראל, בא על חשבון מישהו אחר. המישהו האחר הזה, הוא רב סרן במילואים, מפקד פלס"ר שנלחם מאות ימי מילואים וגם נפצע במלחמה. בנוסף, הוא מנכ"ל בית"ר העולמית, איש ליכוד, ימין אידיאולוגי, תושב יהודה ושומרון. זה כל מה שאתם צריכים לדעת על מה נהיה מהליכוד. פעם מפלגה לאומית ערכית מפוארת, והיום מפעל דהוי ועצוב של ג'ובים והשתמטות.
55
149
907
59,986
🎗️Amihay retweeted
This deserves a serious answer, because I think Ihab is totally honest here. A serious answer isn't short, but hopefully it's interesting. If you don't read it, you'll save yourself another interminable round of Israeli-Palestinian wrangling. Hopefully Ihab will read it. This response is sad, Ihab, because you know what Hamas is, you know what it wants and what it's capable of, and you want Israelis to somehow pretend that none of the things you yourself know to be true are true. Most of the complaints you list here go back to Hamas. Gaza's borders are closed because of Hamas. Gaza has borders with both Egypt and Israel and managed to go to war with both during Hamas's rule. Israel doesn't "control" Gaza's electricity, it *provides* Gaza's electricity - because Hamas bent the entirety of the Gazan economy to build a tunnel system unprecedented in the history of war instead of a proper energy infrastructure. Gaza has natural gas reserves, something that never for a moment suggested to Hamas that maybe it should stop seeking endless war for a few years to develop that energy source and develop Gaza economically. It's depressing that Israel must provide Gaza with electricity, and not Gaza itself. But that part isn't Israel's fault. Gaza could have taken a very different path. The population registry question is similarly a function of Hamas. Israel won't work with Hamas, mainly because it wants to murder all our children. But nothing prevented Hamas from running its own population registry and coordinating it for travel purposes with, for example, Jordan or Egypt. Or, heck, from coordinating with the PA, which itself imposed sanctions on Gaza under Hamas rule. Even the PA. Hamas's refusal to actually run and build Gaza is the main cause of half this list. But there's a deeper problem with this answer. It doesn't actually address my point about the catastrophic effect of the Second Intifada and Second Lebanon War and other assorted violence from Hamas and its fellow travelers on the politics of ordinary Israelis. You accuse me of a "comforting illusion" of Palestinian rejection (I'll respond to that in a sec), but here's your comforting illusion: "Yes, Palestinians have made mistakes, and leadership failures have cost dearly." No, Ihab. The 140 suicide bombings of the Second Intifada weren't a "mistake" or a "leadership failure." It was the heart of it all, it was what Arafat always was. The bombings were popular, the discourse in the Palestinian street - discourse Palestinians expressed to my face on countless occasions and still say today in Arabic social media - was that the very fact that we were willing to withdraw for peace proved we weren't authentic inhabitants in the land and could be removed by violence. You know that's how they talk in actual Palestine, away from the coddled Westernized elites we usually read on Twitter. But you pretend the Second Intifada was some aberration of a failed leadership, and that peace would be available if only the Israelis weren't assholes. "Palestinians have never rejected a genuine peace deal. Even in 2008, Ehud Olmert himself admitted that the Palestinians never said “no.”" They never said no to Olmert, perhaps, but they also never said yes, or provided their own map for Israel to consider. That kind of non-answer can reasonably be interpreted as refusal. Someone who isn't refusing generally provides a counter-offer. No Palestinian leader ever provided that counteroffer, that Palestinian map, a specific delineation of the end of the conflict. No Palestinian leader ever had the courage to say, "this is the line, and after this line is drawn there are no more refugees, no demand to dismantle Israel or flood Israel with descendants or end Israel in any way. This is the end of war, and from now on we build new and better things." That is not a thing any Palestinian leader has ever offered. "And the story of 2000, endlessly recycled as proof of “rejectionism,” is far more complicated than Israel’s convenient myth — it wasn’t simply that Palestinians refused." Of course it's complicated. Also, the Palestinians refused. Arafat didn't just refuse Barak's specific suggestions (warning stations in the Jordan Valley or whathaveyou), he never offered a specific map for Barak to consider. It was always a tease waiting to be offered more. That's rejection. Pro-Palestinian scholars explain that his options were limited by Palestinian politics, pro-Israel ones that he never actually wanted peace. I don't know which is right, but it hardly matters. He couldn't accept anything being offered - and in Arabic explained that nothing he accepted would truly end the conflict in any case. But even this endless back and forth that Israelis and Palestinians have been doing for 30 years wasn't really my point. My point was that my little brother stood in the Ben Yehudah Market in central Jerusalem and watched a suicide bomber blow up. My point is that a friend of mine died in another bombing - and 20-year-old me, fresh from voting for Barak and a Palestinian state, had no explanation for that Palestinian response. I was willing to fight half of Israel to build a Palestine, and Palestine's only message to me - no Palestinian leader has ever actually spoken to the Israeli people in any serious way - was that I and everyone I love should be lying dead in the street. Fall back on your comforting narratives about Netanyahu's "schemes" for eternal occupation. Palestine's problem isn't the Israeli right, it's the collapse of the Israeli left, a collapse I witnessed, a collapsed that took place in my own heart and mind in 140 little increments of fire and blood, and then hundreds more little brutalities in the ensuing years. Until the goal of Palestinians on the ground stops being our eradication, none of the world's love and sympathy, none of the blatant antisemitism that swings into action for you at each war, none of the rage and horror and anger and marches will matter. No more comforting illusions. I accept that there's no peace without ending the military rule, without independence and freedom. Now where's the Palestinian political faction that can win Palestine over by accepting that I too deserve to be here?
That argument collapses under the weight of reality. Israel never truly withdrew. Israel controls Gaza’s air, sea, borders, population registry, and even its electricity. That’s not sovereignty — it’s imprisonment. Palestinians have never rejected a genuine peace deal. Even in 2008, Ehud Olmert himself admitted that the Palestinians never said “no.” And the story of 2000, endlessly recycled as proof of “rejectionism,” is far more complicated than Israel’s convenient myth — it wasn’t simply that Palestinians refused. The idea of “Palestinian rejectionism” is a comforting illusion, crafted to shield Israel from responsibility. The reality is that Israel has never allowed Palestinians to live free, not in Gaza, not in the West Bank, not for a single day since the occupation began. Yes, Palestinians have made mistakes, and leadership failures have cost dearly. But none of that erases the central truth: Israel has never put forward a just or viable peace — only schemes designed to preserve control and call it peace.
107
466
2,313
266,125
RT @VerminusM: Wow, at least 132 fatalities in a police raid against the Red Command gang in Rio De Jenario. Drones, snipers, armored vehic…
267
🎗️Amihay retweeted
Wired, The Atlantic, Guardian and many other propaganda legacy publications would die immediately if they had to support themselves. Donations from far left organizations disguised as charities are what keep them alive. They serve simply as a means of influencing Wikipedia, Google, etc as fake “authoritative” sources.
Kids today won’t believe it but there was a time when Wired published the most fascinating tech deep dives you could find
10,012
28,593
179,102
13,935,746
🎗️Amihay retweeted
Oof, here we go again. NYPD also has a branch in Jordan, which isn't a democracy and has a secret state police that can disappear people. Oh, and it trains with Qatari security services, where leaving Islam is illegal, as is being pregnant while unmarried. And with Mexico, come to think of it, where extrajudicial killings by police are a national scourge. It's amazing how through the fog of their ideological war, only Israel is ever visible? None of this is about policing. It's about Jews.
is it antisemitism to say the truth? us police depts do get trained by israel. and the nypd literally has a branch in israel
91
384
2,132
184,783
🎗️Amihay retweeted
The Babi Yar Massacre, which occurred over two days in September 1941, remains one of the most horrific examples of mass murder during the Holocaust. In Kyiv, Ukraine, nearly 34,000 Jews, including men, women, and children, were rounded up by Nazi Einsatzgruppen (mobile killing units) and local Ukrainian collaborators. They were marched to the Babi Yar ravine on the outskirts of the city, where they were forced to undress, herded to the edge of the ravine, and shot in cold blood. Their bodies were left in mass graves. This atrocity marked the beginning of systematic mass executions in the occupied Soviet Union, and it foreshadowed even more widespread killing across Eastern Europe. The brutal scale of the massacre was compounded by the fact that it took place in the heart of a major city, with the killings being carried out in full view of civilians and the surrounding community. Despite attempts by Soviet authorities to suppress the memory of Babi Yar and its horrors, the massacre eventually became a symbol of Nazi brutality and collaboration. It was memorialized in literature, art, and history, standing as a stark reminder of the depths of human cruelty during the Holocaust.
Community note
The picture is not historically correct; it was generated by AI. share.google/images/xCsaevx…
2,384
2,804
7,101
1,935,840
🎗️Amihay retweeted
The movement to end US weapons sales to Saudi Arabia was tiny, didn't ignite Western capitals in fierce and ongoing marches, didn't reorder progressive politics, and evaporated as soon as the war ended without any repercussions or lingering ill will toward Saudi Arabia. And the Yemen War was an order of magnitude more devastating in terms of sheer human suffering. If the Gaza campaign was about actual weapons sales or the actual suffering of actual Gazans, it would have looked like that.
The movement to end US weapons sales to Saudi Arabia when it was destroying Yemen was led by progressives.
27
71
609
77,792
🎗️Amihay retweeted
BREAKING: The Muslim Student Association at Langley High School, one of the most elite in the country, is recreating hostage taking videos. How is this America? How are we tolerating this?
Asra Nomani
476
2,235
6,603
494,227