Escape the Technocracy Podcast | Watchman's Torch Newsletter Privacy | Rebel intellectualism | Tech warlordism No sponsors = free speech

What is a CYBER 9/11? It's when they flip the switch on 15 years of backdoored infrastructure. No invasion. No missiles. No EMP. No hospitals, diesel, water, or "bugging out." No one better to explain it than Steven Harris. Check it out below. escapethetechnocracy.com/pro…
4
23
945
Comcast has turned millions of routers into motion sensors Your neighbor's WiFi detects YOUR movement through walls Can identify with 99.5% accuracy Doesn't matter if you have a Comcast router - anyone who does could have it turned on you. pcworld.com/article/3218084/…
3
11
259
This guy took apart his LG TV to remove the microphones that are spying on you. Definitely not simple, but interesting to see someone do it. piped.video/watch?v=Bwk99pZm…
3
20
407
Gabriel Custodiet retweeted
. @keonne ‘s latest Notes from the Inside letter for @theragetech #FreeSamourai
7
20
83
3,387
Benefits of HTML website: 1) Loads quickly 2) AI can make in minutes (no dev costs) 3) Costs $40 or less a year to run 4) No Big Tech web builder to kick you off 5) Works on Tor 6) Almost nothing to be hacked 7) Ownership >> Linktree For basic info websites, it's a no-brainer.
4
2
56
1,504
FML
Hi everyone. I am sorry it has been so long since I last checked in with you. As most of you probably know, I was transferred to a new prison to participate in a program that would take a year off my sentence when completed. That journey should have been a simple 4 hour drive, but since I was denied a self transfer furlough the trip took 30 days, two cross country flights, three states, and cost the tax payer well over $10,000 before I finally arrived a couple hundred miles from where I started. It took me over a month to decompress after the nightmare that is the BOP transit system (you can read all about it in the next installment of Notes From The Inside) and just as I began to settle in here at FCI McKean we received some terrible news. Yesterday we were told by the Warden that the program I travelled all that way for had been "deactivated" and very soon I - along with 70 others in the program - would have to go through the transit system all over again to be sent somewhere where the program was still active. When I first arrived here other inmates warned me that things were rotten here at McKean. What is supposed to be a 9 month program averages 12-16 months here. One of the DTS officers who runs the program was suspended pending investigation and assigned to the mailroom, and many guys had missed their release dates and were forced to spend longer in prison. Why in the world did the BOP spend all that money transiting me and others to a program that was clearly dying on the vine?! So now the BOP is going to waste around $700,000 shipping all of us around the country. The ridiculous thing is they do not need to shut the program down at all. They have all the pieces in place to push the current participants through. The frontline staff (case managers, counsellors, DTS, etc) are largely empathetic and competent. The failure is one of institutional mismanagement and leadership. A lack of engagement with staff by Regional and institutional leadership has hamstrung staff and inmate alike. Recognizing those institutional failures would require government workers take accountability or be held accountable. Never going to happen! Instead, the taxpayer will be on the hook financially, we'll be shipped out like cattle, and the yokels who couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery will keep their jobs and find something else to screw up. @leamuirleyn has written to BOP leadership asking them to reconsider shutting the program down and instead send over a temporary leader who can shepherd the current participants through the program. This would save the Bureau and the taxpayer significantly. It is a longshot but one has to try. So that is the latest update. I have no idea when or where I am going to be shipped. Thank you everyone for your letters, books, prayers, and continued support. It means a lot. Until we speak again... Keonne @realDonaldTrump @OfficialFBOP @BOPDirector @BOPDepDirector @JusticeOIG @MarshallProj @PrisonPolicy
1
19
666
Good morning 🌞 What's a good eSIM service that allows you to make calls and works worldwide and accepts btc???
9
1
16
1,241
Gabriel Custodiet retweeted
Not the OSI. Not the FSF. Not even Commons Clause itself calls Commons Clause "open source." This was never about reading code. It's about wearing a label you didn't earn. Full stop. Call your license what it is. There is honor in truth. There is none in pretending.
1
5
22
921
"You only have to be wrong once to be found." From realtor stalking to privacy reboot; New Jersey to homesteading. Pleasure to talk to someone who has put in the work @amandaorson piped.video/ZGZ4bcVCdiQ
5
23
2,586
There are MANY layers of AI censorship: the data they're trained on, the conditioning to refuse certain outputs, blocking of prompts. It's been a very long time since I used censored AI. Fortunately mainstream AI is perfectly suitable for the people who use it.
I pay $20 a month for this shit
1
10
430
Why do people fork Graphene, slap their own branding on it, and sell it as a "privacy phone"? Buy your own phone. Install the carefully-audited and frequently-updated software AS IT IS. And do the 2 hours of work to learn. piped.video/watch?v=lAtBlfXU…
Replying to @Sans_Google
/e/ is a highly problematic fork of LineageOS very poor privacy and atrocious security. People would be far better off using standard LineageOS one of the better supported devices. An iPhone is far more private and drastically more secure than Murena products. /e/ lacks crucial standard privacy and security patches. It has many months and even years of delays to provide those. Nearly all the devices they support lack most Linux kernel, driver and firmware updates. They don't keep up with those for any devices. They don't keep up with Android, Chromium or Linux security updates anywhere either. Many severe patched privacy and security vulnerabilities are left wide open for months and even years with /e/. They heavily mislead their users about what's patched and how long they take to ship it. /e/ also doesn't provide important standard privacy or security protections. It lags years behind on providing the current generation protections and disables many of the most important ones. An operating system failing to protect against known privacy weaknesses does not have reasonable privacy. /e/ includes their own privacy invasive services and sends user data to third parties. They spent years sending user speech data to OpenAI without obtaining consent and falsely claimed the data was anonymized when challenged over it. Despite how it's marketed, it includes many Google services with privileged integration into the OS. They have their own privacy invasive services including user tracking with unique identifiers in their update client. Their own supposed privacy features are incredibly flawed and do not provide what they claim. A small list of blocked domains omitting everything used for useful functionality does not stop tracking by apps or services. It leaves the most privacy invasive behavior of apps and services intact and is trivially bypassed in multiple ways even for what it does cover. Apps and services only need to use the same domains for functionality as tracking to avoid it which is already largely what they do. Apps and services also already widely deploy bypasses for this naive domain-based filtering even for domains dedicated to tracking. /e/ would have you believe that a DNS blocklist is a game changing approach. There are better implementations including RethinkDNS available for use elsewhere. More information: community.e.foundation/t/voi… codeberg.org/divested-mobile… eylenburg.github.io/android_… discuss.grapheneos.org/d/241… /e/ and their for-profit company Murena have repeatedly pushed anti-privacy talking points from authoritarians claiming devices with strong privacy and security are for criminals and pedophiles. Here are 2 examples where Gaël Duval says that himself about privacy/security hardened devices in general: nitter.net/GrapheneOS/status/2040… clubic.com/actualite-604786-… /e/ and Murena many of the same anti-privacy talking points as France's current government and national law enforcement. They've aligned themselves with authoritarians in the country where they're based instead of opposing it. There are dozens of examples where they falsely claim GrapheneOS is mainly useful to criminals and mainly used by criminals. That's more extreme than the claims by France's national law enforcement cracking down on secure devices. They've gone so far to align themselves with anti-privacy authoritarians that they're ahead of them. Murena is a for-profit company with the founders and owners of it being the same people who run /e/. /e/ includes for-profit paid Murena services and is built for Murena to sell devices with it. Despite being made for profit, /e/ receives millions of euros in government funding from governments which have spent years cracking down on legitimate privacy products: > The European Union has subsidized us to the tune of several million for this project. projets-libres.org/en/podcas… /e/ makes it far easier to remotely take over devices, violate user privacy from apps and bypass encryption to extract all the data from a device. These are exactly the kinds of devices authoritarians opposed to privacy and security want people to be using. These devices are much less private and drastically less secure than iPhones but are duping people into paying them for it with false marketing. They're regressing privacy and security instead of advancing it.
1
2
43
1,940
Props to @naomibrockwell for doing this interview a year ago. It has now passed 1 million views on YouTube. Injustice is readily apparently to anyone with eyes. piped.video/watch?v=Fshsk8MC… #freesamourai
Keonne Rodriguez of @SamouraiWallet goes to prison tomorrow. Because he built a privacy tool. Governments says there’s no legitimate reason for anyone to want privacy. And they're waging war on those who say otherwise. Please watch the full interview.
2
14
84
2,795
"There is no such thing as a privacy device; the very idea is counterproductive to privacy."
NEW ARTICLE: "'Privacy devices' are an easy solution in a world where making a purchase is significantly faster and much more psychologically comforting than learning a lesson and putting rubber to road." escapethetechnocracy.com/fre… watchmanprivacy.substack.com…
1
18
629
"So how do I get a TV that doesn't spy on me?!" Here's an option. No microphones. No cameras. Connect to your Linux laptop or media center. Can also track down a projector that doesn't have Google TV (such as Optoma ML1080)
So basically, your LG TV can: - Capture audio and video continuously - Record clear audio from as far as 70ft away - Save text transcripts of conversations - Scan every device on your WiFi - Access your NAS? - Store data when "off" and send later "We own the glass" as they say.
1
29
1,089