I like to think about privacy in terms of counterfactuals. Imagine if Ethereum transactions had been private from day one. Now imagine in 2027, an Ethereum upgrade took away the privacy, and now all transactions are public. What would've been the community reaction? It would've been ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE. How DARE you make my transactions PUBLIC???? Isn't that INSANE??? But we don't actually feel that way about our public transactions today. Why? Because humans are very good at getting used to whatever the status quo is. That's why privacy feels like a meh value prop to a lot of people right now -- because all they've ever known is transactions being public to all, they feel it's just fine the way it is, just like people before cars were fine with horses, and people before iPhone were fine with typing on tiny keyboards. It takes real visionaries to imagine what it's like to have something we don't have today, and most people are not that. Mark my words -- in 3 years, we will be marveling at Ethereum's foresight to work on privacy at scale while everyone thought it was a dead end, just like how people 3 years ago thought it was stupid that Ethereum would make something as far-fetched as quantum resistance a core part of the roadmap. That's also why I'm incredibly thankful for the EF -- while we at @ethlabs_org focus on building what builders and users need TODAY, I take constant solace in the fact that there's another incredibly talented and (thankfully) very well-funded org whose sole focus is on investing in Ethereum's long-term vision, including privacy and quantum resistance. Ethlabs and EF are the one-two punch that our ecosystem needs and what will make Ethereum commercially successful in the short term and a civilizational centerpiece in the long term.
It's only dead if you give up I'm not giving up on privacy. I'm doubling down. firefly.social/post/x/210138…

Last edited Sep 20, 2026 · 2:42 PM UTC

13
22
134
9,434
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @decentrek
Personal information is becoming increasingly important. I trust the Ethlabs community because they will develop personal information encryption technology.
44
Replying to @decentrek
"Because humans are very good at getting used to whatever the status quo is." It seems to be exactly the same with ownership of digital goods. I still can't understand why people accept the current situation, even though a solution has long been available.
16
Replying to @decentrek
Personally I'm pissed it's taking this long. Way too long coming
35
Replying to @decentrek
The counterfactual test is underrated: "Would we accept this if it was taken away?" No one would tolerate their transactions becoming public overnight. But we tolerate being born into a system that never offered the alternative. That's not acceptance - that's never having known better. The Booelievers build for what should exist, not what people have settled for 🙏📖
2
1
8
165
Replying to @decentrek
if ef is for long term and ethlabs for short term why is ef building kohaku and the 0.01 eth tornado pool and not ethlabs
4
283
Replying to @decentrek
It’s not just an Ethereum thing. It’s the entire stack of the internet and it’ll only get worse with AI agents.
I’ve been very careful about what I give Muse access to, but I’m increasingly convinced that the convenience @muse gives to people will allow Meta to completely create and control the digital you to its corporate benefit with very little care to your personal privacy. And people will be WANTING to give them that access because it’s just a huge productivity enhancer. They basically made a better version of OpenClaw accessible to every normie person on Earth with their own cloud VM. I moved out of Gmail to @ProtonMail to protect my email data. Now I have Muse on a separate assistant account but everything filters through Muse now. There’s no getting out of this data exploitation scheme because these products give the average person a useful need. Even if it means giving up your data and having someone know and even can predict everything you will do.
1
54
Replying to @decentrek
Railgun dude.
22
Replying to @decentrek
I'd love to see more kudos and chain design hat tipping to the protocol layers that have given privacy to the chain already. There's been some but not enough. I hope we build frictionless layers for users vs monolithic chain-wise execution risk but we'll see. Still optimistic.
1
105
Replying to @decentrek
the counterfactual is compelling, and it's also a fair challenge to us specifically: we ask users to accept fixed-denomination deposits and proof-generation time as the cost of privacy today, the same way public-by-default asks nothing and people got used to that "free" cost too. the thought experiment cuts against complacency on both sides, not just the "privacy is a nice-to-have" side.
7
28
Replying to @decentrek
i’ve always said that privacy should be implicitly present & be default. The reason “privacy” property is harder to sell because it is unlike any other properties like “speed” or “latency” - those sound like an upgrade. But users have implicitly expected “privacy” to be there in digital products by default. Only blockchains are special case where “privacy” has to designed as explicit feature since its exponentially harder to build privacy products baked blockchains - right from advent of bitcoin.
1
92