Post-doc in the Ellis Lab at Imperial College 🧪 (she/her)

London, England
1/ 🌟 We've added more results to our preprint‼️ TLDR: diatom in vivo assembly, RNP delivery via electroporation, and a new PEG transformation method... (1/10) biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
1
7
15
1,794
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Nature may have explored only a tiny fraction of the proteins that could actually work. That sounds obvious when you consider the size of protein sequence space. But experimentally demonstrating it is much harder. A paper from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory tested thousands of natural and new-to-nature proteins across three protein families, asking a surprisingly fundamental question: How much functional sequence space exists beyond the proteins evolution has already shown us? The answer appears to be: a lot. Across all three families, the researchers found many experimentally functional proteins far from known natural orthologs. In total, the study measured fitness for roughly 3,000 natural proteins and 10,000 new-to-nature designs, creating an unusually large experimental map of distant protein sequence space. But the second result may be even more important for protein AI. The experimental fitness landscapes were rugged. Protein language models and evolutionary sequence models could often capture broad signals of function, but they did not consistently reproduce either the local shape or the global trends of the measured landscapes. In some comparisons, simpler approaches such as Potts models and HMMs performed as well as or better than much larger AI models. That creates an interesting tension. Most protein foundation models learn heavily from the proteins that evolution happened to preserve. But the set of proteins that exist in nature is not necessarily the same as the set of proteins that could function. Evolution had historical constraints, ecological constraints, mutational paths and billions of contingent events. It never performed an exhaustive search of sequence space. So perhaps natural protein databases should not be treated as a map of functional protein space. They are a sparse evolutionary archive of it. And if functional proteins occupy regions that nature never sampled, the next frontier of protein design is not simply learning the distribution of existing proteins more accurately. It is learning where that distribution ends — and where functional biology continues beyond it. The proteins we know may be islands. The functional sequence space around them may be an ocean. biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
1
15
107
6,853
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Bridge editing is a technology for inserting, excising, or inverting any two pieces of DNA. Delighted to report in @Nature today a new paper with @hnisimasu on the mechanism of bridge RNAs and how these programmable gene editors cut themselves out of the genome!
Today in @ScienceMagazine, we report a new DNA editing technology to seamlessly write massive changes into the right place in the human genome. The reason gene editing hasn't transformed human health is that current gene editing technologies like CRISPR are very limited. The problem with CRISPR is that it cuts up your DNA, and then hopes that unreliable cellular DNA repair will make the wanted edit. @geochurch famously called it genome vandalism. More precise versions of CRISPR only edit less than 100 bases - often only a single base. Therefore, it's not suited to make large changes safely. However, most diseases are not the result of mutations in one location. Instead, their causes are spread all across the 3 billion base pairs in the genome. We found bridge RNAs in bacterial “jumping genes” that allow us to make safe and arbitrary changes (insert, cut out, or flip) to every nucleotide within (up to) a 1 million bp sequence in your DNA. In the paper, we show that we can correct the disease-causing DNA repeats that cause Friedreich's ataxia (which is a rare neurological disease). The same approach could be applied to Huntington’s and other repeat expansion disorders. At @arcinstitute, we're working towards a full Turing machine for biology. Evo, our DNA foundation model, helps us design the optimal healthy DNA sequences. And Bridge recombination gives us the ability to seamlessly write these changes into the right place in the genome. This work was a wonderful collaboration with my @arcinstitute cofounder @SKonermann and led by the indefatigable @ntperry13, alongside our amazing bridge editing team: @BartieLiam @dhruvakatrekar @Gabogonzalez515 @mgdurrant @james_jw_pai @AlisonFanton Juliana Martins Masa Hiraizumi @chiaroscurale @hnisimasu
4
43
235
24,863
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Huge faculty recruitment effort at the University of Chicago -- a division-wide, open-rank search looking to hire about 20 faculty across 5 research areas in biology. Come be our colleague! Full announcement: uchicago.app.box.com/s/ckih9…
5
153
472
72,395
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Interested in how sequence-to-expression AI models can be used to predict synthetic biology and genome engineering designs and what the failure modes might be? > Timon has posted a new benchmark set on our GitHub. See his thread below.
Benchmark alert! 📏 Today, @liv_soro and I launch the first comprehensive benchmark for yeast-focussed sequence-to-function models. github.com/Tom-Ellis-Lab/yea…
1
8
31
3,890
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Deep Mutational Scanning at Genome Scale
1/6 🧬 Big news in genomics & synthetic biology! We @huijin6418 @BenLehner present the complete mutagenesis of both the genome and proteome of the bacteriophage ΦX174! 📖 Read the full preprint on @bioRxiv here: doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.25.…
1
6
51
11,196
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Our lab’s latest on synthetic genomics “Synthetic Combinatorial Minimisation of Cell Cycle Control” is up now on BioRxiv - covering ambitious yeast #synbio cell cycle work led by Anastasiya Malyshava and co-supervised by @UniOfSurrey’s Matteo Barberis.
3
23
86
7,447
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
A new method to do mutagenesis inside of living cells, using libraries of retron editors. You put your gene of interest onto an F-plasmid and then coax the cells to pass it around by conjugation. Each recipient cell carries an editor, so the gene picks up a mutation with each transfer. The trick to keeping this "relay" going is a set of three selection markers that you rotate through: at every step you can select for those cells that just received the gene, and those cells become the senders for the next round. So the cycle repeats indefinitely, for as long as you need. They used the method to engineer a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase enzyme to incorporate "unnatural" amino acids into proteins. Normally, if you want to make a library of genetic variants, you'd do it by mutating DNA in a test tube (or synthesizing pseudo-random sequences) and then transforming that into cells. The problem is that cells only take up a fraction of the DNA variants; not all the genetic diversity in the library actually makes it inside the cells. And if you instead express editors directly in cells to edit over and over, those editors tend to make unwanted mutations "in the background," or on the genome, which is usually bad. This new method solves both problems. First, there's no hard cap set by transformation: because the diversity is built up inside the population as the gene travels from cell to cell, the ceiling is set by how many cells you have to work with, not by how much DNA you can transform. And second, because the plasmid is constantly moving into a fresh batch of cells, the gene goes into a "clean" host each time. You are basically resetting the genetic background during each cycle to eliminate those off-target mutations. Clever.
4
42
189
14,383
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Today in @Nature we report how AI-guided redesign enhances protein evolution. Integrating ProteinMPNN sequence design with autonomous laboratory evolution, we establish a workflow to engineer enzymes with improved properties over those evolved from natural proteins. Redesigned starting points consistently evolve an expanded fitness landscape, reaching new function with higher activity, specificity, and stability than their natural counterparts. drive.google.com/file/d/1C-Q… 1/14
9
186
809
115,895
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Engineered plasmids from thousands of labs share almost no consolidated design language — until now. PlasmidGPT is a generative language model pretrained on 153,208 engineered plasmid sequences from Addgene, learning embeddings rich enough to visualize research topics across labs and map plasmid diversity across vector types. Those embeddings do real work: state-of-the-art lab-of-origin prediction for engineered plasmids, plus generalization to natural plasmids for host taxonomy prediction at both phylum and genus level. On the generative side, PlasmidGPT can be steered by a seed sequence or explicit design constraints to produce new functional plasmid sequences that recapitulate the part co-occurrence and synteny patterns seen in real plasmids — not just plausible-looking DNA, but structurally coherent designs. science.org/doi/10.1126/scia…
28
155
10,970
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
5 days left now to apply for the postdoc opportunity in my lab at Imperial in London 🇬🇧 - there’s a chance that we can hire 2 people into the team on this synthetic biology and materials theme. Application link is here - imperial.ac.uk/jobs/search-j…
22
43
5,190
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Huge new work from Japan - radically engineered E.coli genome now half the size of the usual genome. 🧬 🦠 Impressive work… minimising genomes is on the march!
Generating E. coli 0.5 controlled by a half-sized genome biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
3
19
128
13,404
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
1/ Here's an angle to LySE I couldn't show fully in my @NatureMicrobiol paper: Combining my passion for DIY bio & directed evolution, LySE is extremely low-cost. The workflow is just mixing phage lysates and cells. All you need is a pipette & incubator. No epPCR or bioreactors!
2
15
108
11,701
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
This is the culmination of >10 years of work by generations of students and postdocs. Many false starts. And we know that others have tried too. Structural insights into the activate-and-release mechanism of NLR activation. And we can engineer it too! Kudos Team 🙏🔥
Check out our latest work! AlphaFold 3 revealed a transient immune receptor complex that eluded biochemical studies for almost a decade🤯 We describe a conserved structural logic underlying sensor–helper communication in an NLR immune receptor network 🧵👇 biorxiv.org/content/10.64898…
12
49
4,230
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Excited to share our latest paper, out today @CellCellPress. We found that large pieces of the human genome can transfer between cells upon direct contact, endowing recipient cells with heritable phenotypic changes. (1/7) cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092…
38
310
1,003
163,829
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
おかげさまで、gbdrawのGitHub starsが100個になりました。ありがとうございます
2
35
249
15,981
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Excited to share our discovery of a new programmable RNA-guided DNA-targeting system hiding inside bacteriophages that predates CRISPR. We call it VIPR (Viral Interference Programmable Repeat), and it uses an entirely new logic to find its targets. Thread + link below.
26
355
1,264
257,899
Emma Jane Walker retweeted
Newest paper from our lab lead by @Daniel_Nucifora. We show that the entire genome of A. laidlawii can be transferred directly into yeast by cell fusion. Cloning whole genomes in yeast is a key step toward building and engineering synthetic cells. pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs…
2
29
102
8,385