That's the most Low T answer you could ever say. The correct answer is: modern marriage is not marriage, it's a slave contract for a man. I our relationship can model marriage, but in the old ways. Aslong as you are in my house you will be under my protection and provisioning. However, what I say goes. It's my rules, if you don't like it, you may leave at any time but that is a one way trip. ^ THAT is a masculine answer. Straightforward and honest. Your answer is feminine and manipulative.

And Republicans want every town to have its own New Delhi. You might want them all out but most of both parties don't.

Don't get a prenup. Nearly everything you want out of a marriage license you can get eith side contracts. Marriage laws are retro active, even if not yet tested, in court.

I wonder if the next skill their robots are taught is head bobbing

Yeah and mom ain't giggling when it happens.

He sucks at reading the room then.

Those are all effectively solo sports, not team sports. The point of Helen's post is learning to play and work as a group, against another group, while playing within a set of defined rules. Indians and Chinese believe cheating is acceptable if, 1) you can get away with it 2) it serves your group. Americans don't believe in those values and find them to be detestible.

Apex fallacy. Those are outliers. You need to look at the more general population. If you've gone to Asia, Asians are, on the whole, WAAAAY more robotic, one dimensional, and revere bureacracy more than white Americans. That doesn't produce uniqueness, rather just a rigid monoculture.

That's bullshit. You have no idea how many times you'll get "ouch" with more than 6" and slightly above average girth. Women are overall totally retarded and don't know shit about size.

No it's that the bar to get there is soooo high that it's not worth trying cause you're probably gonna fail anyway. It's entirely a rational economic decision to not waste years of life, money, etc., when infinity foreigners (with a Co-ethnic nepotistic and corrupt preference), DEI, and insanely high financial costs exist slowly you down at minimum, if not completely blocking you out. All for what? No family because women won't come around to you until they're in the geriatric phase of their reproductive life? What's the point? Easier to just play video games and get high. Or for get violent. Those are the only two rational paths. I graduated a LONG time ago,Magna Cum Laude, and I could barely get a job after applying for months. I wouldn't survive today. The bar to make it today as a non brown male, is basically PERFECTION, and even then it's for a somewhat mediocre outcome. Utter retardation.

False. Young women vote left. Oriental men and jeets are basically doormat when it comes to women. An Asian only STEM department would be 90-95% left voting.

The problem with striver culture is it makes the merit badge (score/certificate/credential) the objective, not the actual pursuit of skill, inginuitiy, and creativity.

Look at Korea. The grind culture is the same there and they're not poor. It's more a feature of extreme overpopulation. America isn't overpopulated. Nor is Europe or Russia.

And which of you is arguably the better engineer? You or your cousins? I grinded through engineering school cause I could do it but had zero interest. Got to jobs and sucked at it. I just didn't like it at all. So I moved to solo finance and loved it. I got sooo much further doing that than I ever would have as an engineer cause I had talent and liked doing it.

The reason Americans do better on the whole is because you're much more likely to grind at something you like doing, becoming the best at it. If you grind at something without talent, you're not optimizing to be the best at it, your optimizing for something else. Example: in engineering school you don't have to understand the material the best to get the best grades and vice versa. Cause school isn't teaching you to be a good engineer, it's grading you on knowing how to work some formula. You can get the best grades by cheating, doesn't necessarily mean you know the material. You can know the material and get shit grades cause you don't really care. Then drop out and go make something for real and get hired based on your work product rather than a certification/credentialing.

It's because his objective was to know and understand the material. Their objective was the merit badge. Credentialism is prideful and not a sign of humility. Humility is a virtue of Protestantism. The 3rd world lacks humility. China and Korea are included there as they only recently exited the third world. Humility is virtue in Japan.

Those are located between the big toe and second toe on the left foot right?

Women detest average men. They would rather be fleshlight for Chad than be saddled with an average guy. If this wasn't true, birthrates, GLOBALLY wouldn't be falling like a rock.

Asian cultures are grind regardless of talent/interest. American culture is grind at your talent/interest. Two very different philosophies.

Jordan and Lebron are both grinders. THAT said...they're both once in a generation talents. The guy that lives atop the pyramid is a grinder. But the vast majority underneath aren't. Indians think EVERYONE underneath should be, ESPECIALLY from an insanely young age. Realistically, it's usually fairly obvious who is exceptionally talented and who isn't. Grinding for the sake of grinding is just gross. Grinding isn't the goal. Grinding at something you love doing and have a talent for is dedication to yourself, not to grinding. That's the difference between classic American excellence and Indian/Chinese striver culture.