The Path of an Eagle. 🦅 The Story Box. Speak The Truth. Love A Good Debate & Rant. Don’t be a dingbat!

Australia
Who do you think is more stupid Candace Owens or Kamala Harris?
75
1
67
2,431
This is the equivalent to France and Israel hired two assassins to take me out. Remember all Candace does is projection-Maxx so what she’s really saying here is my own craps stink and It’s all over for me. Bye bye candy.
There isn’t a Department of War propaganda campaign from the gates of hell that can undo what I am reading. It’s over for Turning Point USA. The most damning part? They refused to participate in the independent review while publicly lying about what took place. They lied repeatedly and publicly. I am thoroughly disgusted with Erika Kirk. All of this information was at her fingertips and she attempted to be a helpless widow while allowing her employees to publicly lie. Link coming soon.
2
1
19
653
What an extremely gay photo
15
6
72
2,342
If it’s on her official timeline guys then it must be legit 😂
“But it’s on MY OFFICIAL TIMELINE!!” @RealCandaceO @candaceoshow - Our modern day black Veruca Salt
12
3
61
1,019
Lindsay’s own defence attorney said anyone that is accusing Patrick is vile for doing so. Meaning Lindsay killed her kids and Patrick had nothing to do with it. You woman are crazy. Go to God and get help.
“I’m a real conservative, I vote conservative, I follow Matt Walsh and Ben Shapiro…How do so many conservatives think Lindsay killed he’d kids?” Lol here’s a “conservative” woman who’s super confused why other conservatives think there’s so much evidence Lindsay killed her kids. She thinks it’s obvious Patrick and his new wife murdered the kids and framed Lindsay. Do these idiots not realize Lindsay and her attorneys never disputed she did it? Like do they not realize the trial wasn’t even about that?
3
1
9
609
Let the battle of the wigs wearers begin 😂
OMG 😂 Candace Owens lap dog Stew Peters is TRIPPING OUT about her friend Elizabeth Lane calling him bald‼️ He’s now accusing her of being bald and wearing a wig. BUT THEN HE TAKES IT EVEN FURTHER. He says that he knew if he was right about her wearing a wig he must be right about the other threads he’s been pulling at. AND THEN HE GOES ALL IN. And accuses Elizabeth Lane of being a bald headed foreign agent in a wig that was sent to cause infighting amongst the Candace Owens cult. I told you these people always start eating their own eventually.
3
1
9
627
Someone buy this woman a beer!
My question to @AlboMP at the @UN earlier today. @thenightlyau thenightly.com.au/politics/a…
1
1
6
271
This is just a sad perspective. Her view point is if a child can potentially go through hardship they may as well kill the child before they go through it. It made me physically mad and sick to hear her say this. All life is precious. Yes breathing is part of living. You need to breathe in order to live. Genesis 2:7 God breathed the breath of life into the nostrils of Adam. This woman’s perspective is of the devil.
“I don’t want to put any child through what I went through, and if aborting that child means that child will not go through that, then that is the moral thing to do.” This is really hard, and good on Lila Rose for being so compassionate. It’s obvious this woman is really hurt and angry. But the problem with her worldview is that we’re not God. We don’t get to determine whose life is worth living and whose isn’t. When you’re aborting your child, you’re making that decision FOR him, and he may not see the world the way you do. Frankly, he may be stronger and more resilient than you are. He may make something of himself that you failed to do on your own behalf, and regardless, he is an image bearer of God, with a life and purpose that you cannot understand even as his mother. For this woman to sit here and say abused and neglected children would be better off dead speaks to the spiritual sickness inside her and in our culture, and I don’t even think she actually believes it—because she’s still here. She hasn’t given up, and there’s a reason for that. She chooses to keep going, and that is good. It’s not for her to rob other humans of that same opportunity. “Woe to him who strives with him who formed him…Does the clay say to him who forms it, ‘What are you making?’” Isaiah 45:9 There is a God. We are not Him. Life is hard for every single person. We have to accept the fact that we cannot know or understand everything. We don’t know what tomorrow will bring—especially if we voluntarily choose to rob ourselves of that tomorrow. And under no circumstances is it moral or compassionate to make that choice for someone else.
3
3
17
911
Precisely this!
White culture does exist 👇
2
2
9
385
She says we are gonna use democracy to our advantage while holding up a sign that literally says socialist. Idiots 🤦🏼‍♂️
The youth of today are seriously retarded. Just listen to some of these school children talk about One Nation and Pauline Hanson. God help us.
3
1
9
397
How about no!
You all need to chill out about Narnia. dailywire.com/news/aslan-isn…
1
1
16
441
I hope and pray no one watches this film:
Meryl Streep is voicing Aslan in Greta Gerwig's "Narnia: The Magician's Nephew." The lion's new design is inspired by David Bowie (multicolored eyes and a red-striped face). “I wanted someone who was profound but not pretentious, who had gravitas but not morose self-seriousness. Someone who could communicate depth and pathos as well as joy and delight. I wanted someone who was older than 70, so there was a wisdom of experience, but who also had the capacity of fresh wonder, like a child. And also to be one of the greatest actors to ever do it. That list is not a long one,” Gerwig tells Empire. variety.com/2026/film/news/g…
3
1
13
359
Goosebumps every time! I love Narnia
Sólo recordar que venimos de aquí
3
2
10
700
NO!!!
EXCLUSIVE 🪩 Greta Gerwig’s Narnia: The Magician’s Nephew is a rock inspired fantasy nodding to David Bowie and The Who. “Narnia is literally a world made out of music,” she tells Empire. “Rock’n’roll to me felt like a world made out of music.” Read more: empireonline.com/movies/news…
1
2
11
410
“He’s voiced by Meryl Streep” a woman. Bugga off Hollywood honestly.
🚨WORLD-EXCLUSIVE FIRST LOOK 🚨 Greta Gerwig opens the doors to Narnia: The Magician’s Nephew in the new issue of Empire – detailing her revolutionary rock’n’roll adaptation. Here’s your first look at Aslan – and he’s voiced by the legendary Meryl Streep. On sale Thurs September 24. Read more: empireonline.com/movies/news…
2
6
330
My blood is boiling too mate! Australia is cooked.
My blood is BOILING. Keith Blessing has gone from HERO to UNFIT in 3 months? I don't think so. Remember this story? Keith Blessing saved both himself AND his wife from a violent home invasion using his legally owned rifle. Premier Minns called Keith a HERO, the NSW Police praised him, both he and his wife survived what would otherwise have been a fatal attack, thanks to Keith and his firearms. They were the VICTIMS of violence. Now? NSW Police have REVOKED HIS LICENSE and taken his guns, declaring he is 'Unfit' to be a gun owner in NSW. This needs to be the biggest story in Australia right now. Never before have we had such a CLEAR example of VICTIMS being punished, and the LAW ABIDING being disarmed for the PROTECTION OF CRIMINALS. You'd better believe I'm angry, you should be too.
1
1
5
325
Might be due to the water they use to make their food with 🤔
JUST IN: Multiple world leaders have reportedly fallen ill, after attending BRICS summit in India.
1
1
1
196
Oh yes a 1 year anniversary at the place where Charlie was shot and killed just because they are getting sued. How dare they allow that to happen right?! Don’t you idiots think that UVU would have learnt from their mistakes? It doesn’t mean they escape a lawsuit for being negligent. Also what does it say about UVU if they don’t allow a 1 year anniversary at the place where Charlie was shot and killed?! You idiots hurt my brain with your dumb as thoughts you call logic.
1
11
413
He literally wrote this using ai the disgusting pig.
The Most Difficult Kind of Love By John Mappin | IF Magazine There is a peculiar modern belief that love requires silence. If you love someone, apparently, you must never contradict them. Never ask the uncomfortable question. Never disturb the convenient consensus. The loving friend nods sympathetically; the troublesome friend insists upon knowing what actually happened. It is a wonderfully comfortable doctrine. It is also not Christianity. Christian love — agape — is something altogether more formidable. It is not mere affection, nor politeness, nor the avoidance of offence. It is the willing of the true good of another human being, irrespective of the cost to oneself. And Christianity makes an extraordinary claim about that good: It cannot ultimately be separated from truth. St Paul could hardly have put it more precisely: love “rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth.” That, I believe, is the proper Christian lens through which to understand what Candace Owens @RealCandaceO is doing. Her purpose, as I understand it, is more precise than simply “asking questions.” It is to establish the truth about the death of Charlie Kirk wherever she believes that truth remains incomplete, obscured or unresolved; to honour the obligation she feels towards her dead friend; and, by bringing what is hidden into the light, to serve the living people who remain behind. That is the purpose. Her criticism of Erika, where it occurs, is not the purpose. It is incidental to it. This distinction is absolutely essential. Candace is not pursuing Erika. She is pursuing truth. If that pursuit sometimes requires her to challenge something Erika has said, believed or been told, then the challenge is a consequence of the mission, not its object. And that mission is, at its heart, one of fidelity. Fidelity to Charlie. Fidelity to conscience. Fidelity to the proposition that the truth about a human life does not cease to matter when that life ends. Candace loved Charlie Kirk. Death does not cancel the obligations of friendship. In the Christian understanding, it deepens them. She cannot now protect Charlie in the ordinary sense. She cannot telephone him, counsel him, warn him or stand beside him. But she can refuse to permit unanswered questions concerning his death simply to disappear into the fog of public memory. She can remember. She can investigate. She can speak. And she can insist that what is true matters more than what is convenient. This is where her purpose becomes unmistakably Christian in character. Christianity is a religion of revelation. Its movement is perpetually from concealment towards disclosure, from darkness towards light. “For every one that doeth evil hateth the light,” says Christ, “neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.” Candace’s purpose, understood in its highest form, is precisely this movement towards the light. Not to manufacture a predetermined answer. Not to condemn somebody in advance. But to bring everything that can be known into the light and allow truth to reveal itself. That is very different from accusation. It is discernment. And Christian discernment is not passive. The command to “prove all things; hold fast that which is good” requires examination. It requires discrimination. It requires the courage to distinguish what merely appears to be true from what actually is true. That process can be uncomfortable. It can even wound. But Scripture has a phrase for this too: “Faithful are the wounds of a friend.” This becomes particularly important when we consider Erika. If Candace believes Erika herself may not possess the whole truth about circumstances surrounding Charlie’s death, then Candace’s purpose is not ultimately to defeat Erika in an argument. It is to discover whatever truth Erika herself deserves to know. That completely changes the moral geometry. @piersmorgan @PiersUncensored @RealAlexJones
2
3
12
655
Exactly!
The loudest voices claiming Sydney Sweeney has rolled women’s rights back a thousand years were conspicuously silent during the heated “what is a woman” debate. Funny how that works. Perhaps they should examine their own hypocrisy before lecturing anyone about protecting women.
1
4
7
326