Succinct and accurate.

October 7: Israel’s ‘Complacency’ And ‘Tragic Misunderstanding’ Of Hamas... youtu.be/Ago0zreZtcg?is=hwj2… via @YouTube

As Douglas Murray said, would a proportional response be to invade an Arab music festival and kill and rape all the young people attending it?

People like @piersmorgan who don't know (or pretend not to understand) the proven facts about the war in Gaza and the number of civilian deaths are always quick to claim Israel's actions are "massively disproportionate" and that they should show more "restraint". But they never answer this key question: What would be the PROPORTIONATE response by Israel to the savage invasion by Hamas on October 7 to murder, rape, torture and kidnap hundreds of Israeli civilians?

Breaking: "As retired senior military leaders and legal experts, on this, the third anniversary of Hamas's October 7, 2023 brutal attack on Israel, we reject claims that Israel committed genocide in Gaza." @jinsadc I am honored to be a part of 76 retired U.S. officers (including 13 Generals, 27 Lieutenant Generals, 19 Major Generals, 5 Brigadier Generals) Refuting the Genocide Allegation Against Israel. jinsa.org/wp-content/uploads… "The precedent established today regarding Israel will shape the conditions under which American forces fight tomorrow. Protecting civilians and preserving the ability of our nation to defend itself requires us to defend the truth when the laws of war are being distorted to make false charges of genocide."

On the third anniversary of the 7 October Hamas terrorist massacre, don't fall for the lies. Here is a fully sourced account of why you shouldn't believe the propaganda. And do not denounce it unless you've actually clicked on it and read it.

The food organisations quoted by the Rejoiner @FT claim that they want stable regulations, but they won't get stability from dynamic alignment with the EU. The EU has introduced hundreds of new rules for farming, food production and food packaging since we left. Lets stick with UK rules for UK companies! Tory plan to rip up UK-EU food deal risks ‘huge uncertainty’ - giftarticle.ft.com/giftartic… via @FT

If a gay white man like Tom Daley wore blackface he’d lose his sponsorship. So why is Daley’s drag womanface being celebrated by the media? Drag insults women no less than blackface does Blacks.

Bloody Hell!!! 👀👀👀👀

Hopefully no-one in the area needs an ambulance this evening. They will of course I’m sure understand that they may have to wait several hours for urgent care because you know…invading immigrants take priority. 🤦🏼‍♀️

Another terror suspect released on bail. Meanwhile, a mother was denied bail over one quickly deleted post and Danny Tommo was denied bail.

I know a few Jean-Pierres sadly

Below is a very comprehensive explanation of what is wrong with the EU and why the EU wants the UK to pay into EU coffers. Unfortunately, the UK is in almost exactly the same dire situation. But it doesn't need to be, the UK has its own oil and gas - if only our politicians would let us mine it. youtu.be/fg1Kvp5DwxI?is=_mNB…

Gulf Money, Manchester City And A Prime Minister With Questions To Answer Consider the order of events. In February, Lord Stockwood, then a minister, flew to the UAE. He met Sheikh Hamad bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who runs the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and Khaldoon Al Mubarak, chief executive of Mubadala and chairman of Manchester City. Minutes obtained by the Telegraph under freedom of information law record the minister promoting the Oxford-Cambridge corridor. Mr Al Mubarak told him the Emiratis were very proud of their investments in Manchester. A letter followed, inviting Mubadala to visit the project. It also invited Mr Al Mubarak to Grimsby. The government wants £10bn of private money for the corridor. It has pledged £500m of its own. Abu Dhabi is seen as the key investor. On 14 September, Mr Al Mubarak walked into Downing Street to meet the Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds. The Telegraph reports that he already knew City had been found guilty. The Department for Business and Trade says the two men discussed trade, defence and security, and not the club. The independent commission then reported. It upheld all but one of 115 charges and found that City had inflated its results by more than £900m between 2009 and 2018. City denies wrongdoing and will appeal. Every finding here is the commission's, and the club is entitled to contest it. Then the Prime Minister spoke. Asked about the verdict, Andy Burnham told the BBC he would be "really concerned" to lose City's owners. He called them "such a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester". He added that he could not "intervene more", a phrase that implies some earlier intervention. His office denies there was one. Downing Street rewrote its own statement within hours, changing "if wrongdoing is established" to "wherever wrongdoing is established". On Friday night came the sentence that matters. Downing Street said it did not dispute reports that the verdict had undermined the UAE's appetite for future grand-scale UK commitments. Emirati officials, according to Bloomberg, say the Premier League's actions will influence the bilateral relationship. So a foreign state is applying pressure to a British government over the ruling of a British sporting body. The Prime Minister's office has all but confirmed it. Mr Burnham's record sharpens the point. In January 2024, as mayor of Greater Manchester, he argued that the Premier League's conduct towards Everton strengthened the case for an independent football regulator. He got his regulator. Its first great test arrived within months, and the man who demanded its independence is the one who has been heard to fret about the defendant's owners. David Bernstein, a former chairman of both City and the Football Association, told him to stay away. So did the Conservative shadow sports minister, Louie French, and the Liberal Democrat spokeswoman Anna Sabine. Fairness requires some caveats. No evidence of a bargain has been published. Mr Burnham will say his Everton experience taught him to distrust the Premier League's process, and he has since stepped back. Conservative governments also courted Gulf capital, and they were right to want investment. The question is narrower. A Prime Minister who built his career in Manchester, on Abu Dhabi money, now depends on Abu Dhabi money to fund his flagship growth project. Whatever his motives, that dependence hands a foreign government leverage over a regulator's decision. The Football Regulator has powers to judge owners fit or unfit. It must use them without regard to the balance of trade. Mr Burnham should say so plainly, in public, and then stay silent. Britain can find its investors elsewhere. It cannot find another independent regulator. "Andy Burnham told the BBC he would be "really concerned" to lose City's owners. He called them "such a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester"."

But it couldn’t be social contagion, folks. It’s just that young people, especially autistic, gay and mentally ill ones, are finally free to be their authentic selves. The sudden explosion of young women who want to cut off their healthy breasts and take testosterone? Well, it’s absolutely not the newest form of self-harm, to which troubled adolescent girls are provably prone, ok? It’s not a consequence of the commonplace fear of becoming an adult woman, with all that that entails. No, there’s nothing to worry about there. The possibility of regret? Naturally, we don’t let minors get tattoos or own guns or vote, because that would be ridiculous, but if they want irreversible surgeries and drug treatments, they must be given them, and everyone around them must immediately agree they are now the opposite sex. That’s called being kind. And the mounting numbers of detransitioners? They were never trans, obviously, and should be mercilessly attacked, especially if they now say they were vulnerable and in a friendship group, online or off, dominated by trans identities, where transitioning was presented as a way to resolve all their social and emotional difficulties. (I have the emails). No, there’s nothing whatsoever to see here. Keep justifying it, keep cheering it on, keep insisting that the doctors and drug companies making serious money out of it all are acting with the purest of motives. Answer every reasonable question with an accusation of hatred and bigotry. Dispel every qualm of conscience with an activist-approved talking point. Reassure yourself that everyone on your dinner party circuit agrees with you. And when, in years to come, we’re all looking back on graphs like this, be proud that you did your bit to monster whistleblowers, parrot unevidenced claims and create the climate of fear that allowed the worst medical scandal in a century to take place.

Of course 🤦🏼‍♀️

The left always are what they accuse others of 🤷🏼‍♀️

Hang on, A mother received a sentence of 31 months for one social media post. Throwing an empty plastic bottle at the police is a two year sentence. Human trafficking is just a sentence of 18 months. The UK is a two-tier joke.

Corrupt PM?