Head of research @blockspace_eth | @blockspaceforum | fmr. head of research @ChorusOne | block building enthusiast

Switzerland
Two out of the three top multi-party blocks by value uplift landed in the last 2 days. Don't expect these to stay on the leaderboard for long. New significant performance improvements are already in testing. These will allow MPBC to support even larger blocks.
Replying to @Blockspace_ETH
7/ Record Fees 🫰: The block with the highest value uplift to date landed during the last 7 days, adding 220% to the proposer bid! In this block, a total of 0.0532 ETH was added. This value is split between the proposer and the builders and operators who contributed.
1
6
625
Here's the multi-party block with the highest gas uplift to date. MPBC increased gas usage by 1346%, adding 24.5M gas. It's Slot: 15213880 The highest number of transactions added to date is 810. Assuming users would have waited ~12s for the next slot, it saved them 2.7h. You can find it on the dashboard (Slot: 15180396).
Replying to @Blockspace_ETH
3/ ⛽️ the Gas Usage: When observing transactions/blobs added per MPBC block, most have similar numbers of transactions added. However, some extreme outliers add far more transactions, with the top 1% of multi-party blocks exceeding 147% of gas added!
11
669
All top blocks by gas added are by newer and smaller base builders. This includes 24.5m gas added to one block (+1346%)! MPBC rewards providing faster and more predictable inclusion to users. Blocks from smaller builders typically have comparatively more space available. Check out the MPBC dashboard to view every single MPBC block.
Multi-party block construction could make smaller builders more competitive. Builders earn when they contribute to other's blocks, or when others contribute to their blocks. -> The less flow a builder has, the higher the relative value that can be added to its blocks. -> The less likely a builder is to win a slot, the higher the relative revenue from adding TXs to others' blocks. Curious how this will reflect on bids.
1
20
1,522
Replying to @QuasarBuilder
Fantastic to have Quasar as part of the Blockspace Forum and MPBC! Onwards & upwards..
3
48
The Swiss housing price index, annualized Sharpe of ~1.9.
1
7
650
Replying to @TheWattenhofer
Falco for Austria:
1
2
68
The current AI discourse reminds me of the classic 2013 "Bitcoin Citadels" story.
1
4
157
Replying to @0x9212ce55
> Most painful DeFi Experience.
1
80
Interesting chart on quant shop AI use vs. trade duration. From an FT article - linked in replies - that is generally worth reading.
1
1
4
286
4/ Access just about any frontier model privately via Venice. Includes Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2, Gemini 3...
1
1
162
3/ Supports any number of parallel conversations. - Ask models to sanity check each other. - Ask multiple models to check your work. - Ask models to take on specialist roles.
1
31
2/ Chat with LLMs through the sidebar. Models can directly modify spreadsheets. Select cells to share them with the model. Everything else stays private.
1
1
43
🧵1/ Native Claude support for Linux spreadsheets Built a native extension that allows Claude and other frontier models to plug into calc spreadsheets. In difference to Claude Excel, it allows chatting with multiple frontier models in parallel. Privacy support via @AskVenice
1
3
241
The Anthropic take home was good fun. Managed to squeeze under 1.8k cycles before dinner, temporarily hovering around some folks more familiar with performance computing. My main learning is that AI agents should be given a clear function to maximize. Most valuable as a way of trying many things quickly in such a framework, rather than for cognition. A second learning is that trimming complexity and bloat regularly helps avoid dead-ends.
2
4
427
We're now merging blobs, up to doubling their count in underutilized blocks.
It's a latency cost / price mismatch, and the market functioning rationally. This will soon structurally improve: (1) Relay block merging allows last-mile blob appends (2) Optimistic relaying v3 removes the blob latency hit from the auction more - ethresear.ch/t/relay-block-m… nitter.net/_eltitan/status/196099…
1
4
561
Graphs I enjoy seeing.
4
125
Palermo BA is one of the world’s great neighbourhoods.
7
301
Finally managed to get my hands on the full set 2007-2008.
2
115
Also this is nicely done -
1
111
As it happens, I’m currently reading Mozart’s letters. He, quote, is: “…most surprised and delighted about loud shouts of ‘Bravo’” in the middle of a Piano performance. Clapping during a concert is indeed traditional / appropriate. Source ->
1
3
10
2,312
Presented Relay Inclusion Lists (rILs) in the FOCIL breakout call today. rILs improve Ethereum's censorship resistance fast and simply. It's doable today. Recording & research post: - piped.video/watch?v=0clvpSfi… - ethresear.ch/t/relay-inclusi… Merci for the discussion @soispoke @weboftrees @jih2nn..!
2
6
408
SIMD-228 is a net plus for Solana, albeit the new inflation curve appears a tad aggressive. We expect the key risk to be reward variance for low-stake validators during low-volume periods. To illustrate this point in just two graphs: (1) Market APR since Jan 1st. with outlier events (e.g. TRUMP launch). (2) Market APR since Jan 1st without outlier events. We recommend voting "yes", but will split our vote to fully reflect delegator preferences. Read more here: chorus.one/articles/an-analy… Props to @un_data_wiz and @0xrafal for the excellent analysis. Thanks to @kankanivishal and @maxresnick for the discussions.
14
5
45
18,914
We just published a practical perspective on inclusion preconf pricing. -> Comes with a dashboard; play through different models. -> Outperforms standard heuristics significantly. Dashboard: preconfs.chorus.one Article: ethresear.ch/t/pricing-trans… Props to @benrobaglia @un_data_wiz
1/ Inclusion preconfirmations are coming to Ethereum... we're more than ready, and we want to make sure you are too!🧵 Test Pricing Models: preconfs.chorus.one/ Dive into our latest research: ethresear.ch/t/pricing-trans…
7
354
We'll do our best to roll our @berachain testnet performance over to mainnet, but no promises.
6
423
After cancelling my initial flight, @lufthansa has now waitlisted me for the third (!) alternate over the span of two days. There are probably ~15 ppl in the same situation. Epically bad performance for passengers and the ground staff forced to deal with the fallout.
Airline delayed my flight for a day, and I’m waitlisted. Maybe this is an applied lesson on preconfs.
2
5
1,099
Yeah, makes sense. For us one specific concern was that timing games increase burn, creating an unfavourable tail that again disproportionately hits solo stakers because less draws
1
46
Started to explore / build out infra for our @berachain PoL algo. Drafted up a toy dashboard to visualize things - check it out. Early Observations - -> Infra seems performant. Can query the RPC via multiple threads & it stays responsive. -> BEX is a fork of crocswap, now @ambient_finance, TIL! That’s nice. -> Still early. Eg seeing signs of what may be user agent tests in the LP-token naming. Maybe you can spot it in the image. Dashboard is not final in any way, just play at this point. It runs a live fetch, screenshot is a snapshot after startup. -->Overall, early days still, but feels exciting.
Started looking at @berachain / PoL. It's a cool concept. Best way for validators to distribute incentives will be via a public algorithm, computing on public inputs. We'll build it. Goal -> Maximize user welfare, minimize shitstorms, minimize slippage
2
2
17
3,008
Cool talk and result! - Self-built blocks do not feature private order flow and artificially depress the base fee. - These are typically followed by mev-boost “recovery blocks” that subsequently significantly raise the gas fee. -> Decoupling between the base fee & spot demand for blockspace if vanilla & mev-boost blocks are mixed. -> Divergence expected to increase as the share of private order flow increases. -> Another reason is that builders have more time to provide a block vs. a typical vanilla proposal. Keen to read the study. A weaker result would also extend to proposer timing games, where builders have more transactions available as the slot progresses. Graph from our timing games study below.
Looking forward to contributing to Metagame Day at @modular_summit. My session on “Gas Matters: New Sources of Base Fee Volatility” starts at 3:20pm and promises to be 🌶️🌶️🌶️ collective.flashbots.net/t/m…
1
1
8
3,054
4/ Relay-wise, no surprises. @titanbuilderxyz continues to outperform.
1
5
210
3/ Keeping idiosyncratic risk low is important. For example, consider querying a relay multiple times to lock-in cancelled bids. There's a solid chance the relay will rate limit. Even if it doesn't currently, it can throw up a limit at any point. Rotating IPs to bypass such a limit is not a desirable point on the risk <> reward curve. Consider the curve max. bid / current bid - does that look like cancelled bids are a sufficiently large opp. to run the additional risk of swapping out IPs? Likely not.
1
1
181
2/ We're outperforming our original estimate by a lot. Timing games are mostly an optimization over the hardware, networking, kernel layer. The mev-boost fork itself is generally downstream. Though some moated, non-obvious additions to mev-boost are possible: nitter.net/ChorusOne/status/17882…
Replying to @ChorusOne
6/ Here's a sneak-peak of the results so far: ELI16: Adagio 2.0 narrows the window in which we solicit blocks, allowing us to be much more precise about latency parameters, which reflects as less risk and higher rewards.
1
4
194
1/ Our view of the mev-boost auction (v.01) -> adagio.chorus.one/ Tracks the PBS auction to simulate the payoffs with- and without timing games for our setup. The long-term upside settles around ~10%, which is a comfy risk-adjusted spot. Observations below ->
1
3
31
4,381
Spent the last 3 days talking preconfirms at @ZuBerlinCity. Glad we proposed some of the first-ever preconfs. Very cool..! But mostly excited about what's still cooking.. 🕶️
based preconfs are live on devnet 🕶️ → preconf modules by @chainbound_, @primev_xyz → commitment sidebar by @Commit_Boost → gateway operators @EspressoSys, @titanbuilderxyz → relay operators @titanbuilderxyz, @ultrasoundmoney → staking operators @ChorusOne, @Kiln_finance → devnet devops @BarnabasBusa, @parithosh_j → dashboard viz @ascii_g1rl, @jacobdcastro → coordinators @DrewVdW, @kubimensah, @tzhen → ZuBerlin crew @cshg0x, @marc_nitzsche, @pascalstichler → special guests @AmirOnchain, @lvdanil, @macrosam based teamwork 🕶️
1
3
16
1,928
Bullish @symbioticfi Felix is a great guy and true OG..:
Excited to share that I’ve joined @symbioticfi as the Head of Ecosystem to help build out a maximally permissionless and flexible shared security primitive.
3
22
1,126
Replying to @0x94305
If I catch your drift correctly- These last 100ms are likely worth a maximum if arbitrageurs know they're incoming, due to inventory risk. If arbitrageurs don't know, then I'd say value tends to cluster at the expected block submission time. Attaching some empirics from our timing games study: chorus.one/reports-research/…
1
1
2
421
1/ Some quick alpha on the timing games & Solana discussion. We ran the numbers on node geographic distribution in ~Feb. Results did indicate that there was concentration around ~BeNeLux. Specifically, in one NL datacenter. Nodes in this datacenter seemed to do well -> but..
1
2
12
1,170
@titanbuilderxyz relay with beastly performance last week.
1
1
8
581
Live dashboard showcasing our in-validator view of the mev-boost auction. Compares our Adagio mev-boost fork to a standard setup. Landing soon alongside the methodology. Will cover longer time-horizons. Last week was a very strong week.
1
2
12
1,451
The start of an exciting experiment..
8
248
4/ The short answer was - yes, but due to variance, a reliable upside estimate would take a while to manifest. The graph shows the way the current bid evolves as a fraction of the max. bid over time. Taken from our study on timing games (as is the first graph) - linked below.
1
86
1/13 Adagio, our mev-boost fork, has been publicly available for 100 days now. We have been testing it on mainnet since early 2023. A quick thread on timing games and how we found them, rational competition, and resilient decentralization 🧵
🥳Adagio, @ChorusOne's #Ethereum MEV-client has crossed its 100 day milestone! 🎖️During this period, Adagio extracted a total of 7.84% extra MEV vs. a "vanilla" client.
1
3
11
2,652
Excited to present our work on validator timing games & externalities at ETH Denver today: 5pm, Neptune Stage. For a sneak peek, check out @umb_nat's excellent presentation from a recent Lido community call: piped.video/watch?v=J_N13erD…
3
5
976
Great panel on MEV, LVR, and all things incentive alignment with @0xMagmar @tkstanczak @ThogardPvP @maxresnick today. Thanks organizing @a41_allforone - cool event!
3
12
808