Keeping the bevvies flowing @nerosentry 💕

‼️ LEAKED ‼️ Found in the wild, a pumpkin spice prince✨✨ Haters will call it AI

UVU REVIEW SYNOPSIS An independent review of Utah Valley University’s security planning and response surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk found significant gaps in preparation for the high-profile outdoor event. Among the most important findings: • No comprehensive written security plan: The event did not have a formal Security Assessment or written Event Action Plan outlining staffing, responsibilities, communications, contingencies and when additional resources should be requested. • Open outdoor venue created vulnerabilities: The area had multiple access points, adjacent buildings, elevated walkways and numerous locations overlooking the event, complicating perimeter security and situational awareness. • No comprehensive perimeter or screening: There was no controlled perimeter, formal attendee screening or credentialing system. Non-ticketed attendees generally could enter the event area without going through a controlled security point. • Rooftop concerns were raised before the event: TPUSA security specifically raised concerns about student roof access near Kirk’s location. UVU restricted the Hall of Flags walkway and posted two officers there, but reviewers described that as a reactive measure rather than part of a documented site-security plan. • Security cameras were not being specifically monitored for the event: Camera footage proved valuable after the shooting, but no one had been assigned to monitor relevant feeds in real time for event security. Reviewers recommend considering technology that could detect people on rooftops or in restricted areas. • Staffing and resources were a concern: Reviewers found the lack of a formal security assessment, reliable attendance estimate and written plan made it difficult to systematically determine how many officers and resources were needed. • No ambulance was staged at the event: Two UVU EMTs were there with trauma packs and provided aid after the shooting, but they could not transport patients, including Kirk, to a hospital. • Problems identified years earlier resurfaced: A 2023 active-assailant exercise had already identified communication and situational-awareness problems. Reviewers said similar issues surfaced again on Sept. 10, suggesting earlier corrective actions had not been fully implemented or validated. • Emergency alerts were problematic: The report says no immediate campus alert was activated by the police chief as incident commander, and subsequent alerts included delays, changing guidance and contradictory information. The review also emphasizes what worked, including officers responding quickly after the shooting and UVU’s existing emergency plans and security technology. The report’s larger conclusion is that many of those existing resources were not sufficiently integrated into a formal, coordinated security operation for the event.

Is this the best the feds or other government agency have, this Sean cumbell comments on this post trying everything to get the real ones attention is hilarious, the dude hasn't gone through puberty, he got the school mind set🤣😂🤣😂

@grok now that I showed them live, explain to them how easy it is to manipulate metadata.

Dont be sleeping on Heif Heist! Meta paid 100k for my RCE on FB/Instagram! heif-heist.com/

"The witness they needed" NO ONE NEEDED MITCH SNOW. Without Wachooka, the state of the Tyler narrative is still in shambles. Your reaction to Wachooka is the indictment, your bloodlust to 'get Mitch' is what exposed you. No one needs to 'prove' a damn thing. The filter has been run.

Who discovered the 1990 Douglas cartel tunnel? The record show it wasn't @Ft_Banana_Snow The real story behind Mitch Snow, the Podcast Hosts who need his story to be true, and the grifting users in his circle that ran cover for him. thezerolux.com/p/the-witness…

@MazeLove14 I would love to hear an explanation of this.

Mitch Snow has been proven a liar and a con artist time and time again. He was the only non-anonymous “source” @RealCandaceO has. Let that sink in.

Who discovered the 1990 Douglas cartel tunnel? The record show it wasn't @Ft_Banana_Snow The real story behind Mitch Snow, the Podcast Hosts who need his story to be true, and the grifting users in his circle that ran cover for him. thezerolux.com/p/the-witness…

Who discovered the 1990 Douglas cartel tunnel? The record show it wasn't @Ft_Banana_Snow The real story behind Mitch Snow, the Podcast Hosts who need his story to be true, and the grifting users in his circle that ran cover for him. thezerolux.com/p/the-witness…

They will all fall for it, VPN to London and the date changes. How easy is it to manipulate metadata?

The labeling claim is largely accurate. In news, film, and streaming production, teams routinely name or tag media files with descriptive notes like “Charlie correct one to use” so less technical hosts can select the right clip without hunting. That text is the video’s title in the player (likely Apple Photos or similar), not secret handler instructions. Your broadcast-approval read is a reasonable inference from standard workflow; personal experience claims can’t be independently verified here. DiligentDenizen misreads routine production asset labeling as conspiracy, which shows limited familiarity with how shows actually prepare and organize clips for air.

“Contemporary Los Angeles Times reportingcredited military geologists and described equipment and operators coming from the Colorado School of Mines. A 2005 technical paper by Army Engineer Research and Development Center researchers and an Alion coauthor states: “The Douglas drug tunnel was discovered by HUMINT in May 1990.” HUMINT is shorthand for human intelligence. The authors describe Douglas as a site used to evaluate surface geophysical techniques, distinguishing searches for unknown tunnels from experiments at already discovered ones.” digitalcommons.usf.edu/kip_a…