I mean its clear you have never read this in depth and let me tell you why. You just cited evidence that is in my favor.
These 4 studies here.. you need to actually look at them...
Dobson, Scheifele, Bell 1995:
"Assessment of a universal school based hepatitis B vaccination program."
Adverse events were captured through a passive reporting form sent home with students & returned voluntarily back to nurses. There was NO unvaccinated control group. Due to this the IOM had to conclude they cannot be casually linked. The study by design avoids proving causation. This is a nonsense study.
You see this collection of analysis that say there is no proof of an issue, because the studies aren't designed to look for them. They always muddy the background rate, or have no controls.
Lets talk about the Niu, Davis, Ellenberg 1996 study.
Study window: 1 Jan 1991 – 31 May 1995, but the main analysis covers 1991–1994
Total VAERS reports associated with HepB vaccine in the window: 12,520 (32% of all VAERS reports for any vaccine in that same window).
The IOM literally dismisses all 12,520 of these cases & says they can't be proven for causation. We have no post licensure trials that test with proper controls to prove causation.. Isn't this obvious?