Interesting post. Your second paragraph generates many thoughts worth debating another time. But your last paragraph is on point. Appreciate you taking the time to write this.

Spelled correctly

Sir, we met the night of Secretary Hegseth's confirmation hearing. Thanks for fighting along side us!!

A much needed return to America’s tradition of producing the world’s TOUGHEST officers. It’s time to put lethal warfighters back in command.

No, not real easy. NTC, JRTC, Warfighter, ITX, MCCRE, Red Flag, COMPTUEX, are all premiere training evaluations. They require, "meeting the unit where it is at." They are not consistent. There are many variables. And the commander is not the focus, nor should they be. While I agree there is overlap, I think the cost of repurposing is too high. Those training events should be what they are designed to be - premiere training and evaluation for a unit about to go out the door. That being said, if at 29, a separate assessment, with controlled variables could be created, it would be ideal. Or perhaps an event between 29 and NTC... real ideal.

Thanks for posting... I say while holding a lighter. This story needs to be told. Respect.

I'll show you my score if you show me yours.

You would think the Air Force Times would reach out to the Air Force to get specifics on their version of the JWE, before reposting general information. Perhaps I expect too much... deep sigh.

That will be the USMC's decision. That's not what they decided. I hope at some point we get there.

.@PeteHegseth is greatest secretary of war in my lifetime and I served 24 years in the army.

And just like that.....this is how you rebuild a warfighting military.👏👏👏 Our fantastic @SecWar has announced the creation of The Joint Warfighter Evaluation. It puts colonels and captains through realistic combat decision-making instead of just stacking staff jobs and polished evaluations. Eisenhower and Nimitz weren’t selected because they were good at Pentagon PowerPoint. They were selected because they could fight and adapt under pressure.🫡🇺🇸 Our troops deserve commanders chosen the same way. Well done, Secretary Hegseth.👏👏👏👏

FWIW this guy also went to Harvard. Shocking right? Working with some incredible leaders like @DerrickforVA and @JulesHurstIII, Luke has drafted more meaningful policy proposals, especially for the Army, than most in the Pentagon. Bureaucrats despise him. So I like him.

I also like all three of those men.

Our troops are in good hands with Hegseth at the helm. 🇺🇸

Warfighter > Politician 💥🇺🇸

As a proud Virginia Military Institute (VMI) graduate and former active-duty U.S. Army Special Operations Forces Officer, I’m thrilled to follow in George Marshall’s (VMI ‘1901) footsteps to shape America’s officer corps. America demands senior officers that can build and sustain combat power, layer battlefield effects, and impose devastating costs on our Nation’s enemies. The Joint Warfighter Evaluation (JWE) and a departure from careerism are critical to this end and enhancing senior officer selection and assignment processes. Who we promote, and who we empower matters, and affects everything from recruitment, to retention, to readiness and quality of life. Aggressive innovation in talent-management is key, and we must not build a military that operates solely based on the last conflicts it had a positive experience fighting. We are not guaranteed such privilege in the future. Shout out to the many incredible uniformed and civilian leaders across the Joint Force and @DeptofWar working to make the JWE happen and thank you @stuartscheller and @SecWar for trusting me to support this transformative initiative. We’re just getting started! 🇺🇸

This will elevate the ranks of military leaders at the top. No doubt the detractors will bitch & moan but you have to ask yourself, why would you not want rigorous standards for your General Officers & Navy Captains? Is it because you are content to see the U.S. military slide into mediocrity? Or is it because you are part of the political machine that has been systematically whittling away the advantages the U.S. military has over America’s enemies through the policy of “over-match” which under Biden’s autopen administration was downgraded to “parity”. I am not making this up: it comes from a U.S. military General who was told directly that the policy for U.S. forces in space was no longer er “over-match” - it was “parity” & there were multiple orders that I cannot disclose publicly that went along with ensuring that outcome. That is real. So is the fact that we left behind over $80 billion dollars of military equipment in the hands of terrorists in Afghanistan, including sensitive technology that had given U.S. forces a significant advantage on the battlefield - ie: over-match. Why would anyone do that when there was no one forcing them to do so? No reason to pull out in chaos & adhere to a timeline set by terrorists you could have crushed overnight if you had used a fraction of your advanced military capability? We are facing Americans, leaders within our own country, who have been actively degrading the American military and reducing our advantages on the battlefield as a matter of policy. Not an accident, not a mistake. Intentional.

A new Pentagon promotion test is putting would-be generals into simulated combat scenarios before boards decide who gets a star. The Joint Warfighting Evaluation will give eligible senior officers military problems to solve, with some versions featuring an AI-powered adversary that responds to their decisions in real time. "Right now in our current system, we have people that are very good at navigating their careers," Pentagon adviser Stu Scheller tells Fox News Digital, while stressing existing performance reports will remain the "bedrock" of promotion decisions. The first evaluations are expected in 2027, and each service is taking a different approach. See what future generals will face: foxnews.com/politics/pentago…

Pentagon unveils battlefield test to ensure new generals are warfighters – not Washington bureaucrats foxnews.com/politics/pentago…