Politics, world events, health -MAGA , social worker, i think for myself.

zonulin retweeted
这女子叫Lulu Freistadt,她是“智能选举(Smart Elections)”组织的联合创始人兼执行董事。她表示自己从 2021 年起一直在纽约市担任投票站监督员(poll watcher)。  事件经过: 她提到昨天(投票期间)她在纽约布朗克斯(Bronx)的一个投票点做监督工作。  起初一切正常,投票人数与扫描的选票数量对得上,她本准备离开。  但随后她发现一件非常奇怪的事:所有的投票站工作人员(poll workers)都在清点并准备离开,而投票机却仍然开着、没有上锁、没有密封,选票也还没有被取出。  按照正常程序,每台投票机都应由指定的投票工作人员负责关闭、密封并取出选票。但现场的机器和选票完全处于未密封状态。  交涉与冲突: 当她坐下等待工作人员按规定处理选票时,协调员(coordinator)开始变得焦躁不安,并打电话给副首席书记官(deputy chief clerk)。对方告诉她必须离开。  她指出根据法规,投票监督员有权留在现场直到投票结束、选票被取出并放入密封容器中。  尽管她据理力争,但工作人员和警察还是要求她离开,现场只留下一名技术人员在无人监督的情况下关闭投票机。  结尾:她强调这种不符合规范的做法为作弊提供了可乘之机,并呼吁大家关注和转发。
773
8,895
16,813
233,382
zonulin retweeted
“You are quite openly Jewish” “If you choose to remain here you will be arrested for breaching the peace” In Sadiq Kahn’s diverse & inclusive London - Police threaten you with arrest just for being Jewish in areas of the City people might take offence to that.
166
796
2,478
37,249
Decarceration is when a psychopath with an open warrant for strangulation punches a random guy onto the path of an incoming train, killing him, and the DA and judge ensure he doesn’t spend a single day in jail for it. This is what every single Democrat supports. Decarceration is at the core of the left’s revolutionary platform and there is not one Democrat opposing it.
🔥👀 THE CURRENT STATE OF PHILADELPHIA. What you are seeing here is Chaz Wearing punching a man onto the tracks in front of a train in 2024. He was FREE on the street with an outstanding bench warrant from a 2022 Upper Darby strangulation case. DA Larry Krasner’s office didn’t charge him with murder … they charged him with involuntary manslaughter. He never faces a jury. Democrat Judge Diana Anhalt hears the bench trial and acquits him March 3, 2025. That strangulation case? He pleaded guilty in June 2024 and got 11½ to 23 months in county jail with credit for time served back to January 2024. A man is dead. Victim’s name & photo were Never released. Local Philly stations cover it for a couple days. Then silence. No CNN, no NYT, no national networks. When he was acquitted by the Democrat judge Philly local media didn’t even cover it… just KYW Newsradio ran the story. The judge Diana Louise Anhalt also presided over the FIRST EVER SAME SEX MARRIAGE in Philadelphia. She is up for re election in 2032. Who wants to take a guess at why it appears the media buried this? What is this victims name? x.com/TrumpsLostBalls/status…
29
568
2,118
35,005
zonulin retweeted
For more than two decades, Colin Farrell kept the details of his oldest son’s life largely outside the Hollywood glare. James, born in 2003, was diagnosed with Angelman syndrome around the age of two and a half—after an earlier misdiagnosis of cerebral palsy. The rare neurogenetic disorder affects the nervous system and typically brings significant developmental delays, challenges with movement and balance, limited or absent speech, and, for many, seizures. James is nonverbal. Everyday milestones that most families take for granted have required years of therapy, persistence, and support. Farrell has described the moment James took his first steps, just short of his fourth birthday, as one of the most overwhelming experiences of his life. Even with the resources of a long career in film, Farrell has spoken about the ongoing difficulty of finding the right long-term support. For years the family chose privacy. As James approached adulthood and the structured supports available in childhood began to fall away, Farrell began asking harder questions about what comes next for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities—and for the parents who will not always be there. In 2024 he spoke publicly in depth for the first time and launched the Colin Farrell Foundation, focused on education, advocacy, and practical programs for adults with intellectual disabilities and their families. He has been clear that the decision to step into the spotlight was not about publicity. It was driven by his son. His stated hope is simple and direct: that the world treat James with kindness and respect. The foundation exists so that other families navigating the same transition do not have to do it entirely alone. After protecting James from public attention for most of his life, Farrell chose to use his platform for one reason—his son—and for the many others facing the same realities.🙏❤️
19
41
232
7,912
zonulin retweeted
I cannot stress enough how a billionaire American, living in China, is fully committed to the communist agenda and is destroying me for investigating and reporting his illegal activities to undermine America for not being communist. I'm not going to sugarcoat it; the lawfare is crippling. He is married to Code Pink co-founder Jody Evans. And while Cancer is 💯 financially devastating, however, being targeted by an agent of a foreign enemy is despicable. And there is so much more. With the Chinese Communist Party, there ALWAYS is. Sanctioned Iran Link? Code Pink Bombshell New Horizon ties exposed! Code Pink co-founder (and Jody Evans' partner) Medea Benjamin attended a Tehran conference run by a group the U.S. Treasury Department later sanctioned for helping Iran’s Revolutionary Guard spy on Western visitors. givesendgo.com/TonyAndYoland…
Some news for my followers: the lawfare being waged against me, my partners, and dozens of my companies finally has a name attached to it. His name is Neville Roy Singham. The basics, all on the record: - American-born, Shanghai-based. He sold his tech firm, ThoughtWorks, for $785M in 2017, then moved to China. - Married to Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans. - Funneled roughly $278–285M into a cluster of US nonprofits since 2017 — Tricontinental, The People’s Forum, Peoples Dispatch, BreakThrough News, Code Pink — routed through donor-advised funds at Goldman Sachs. - That same money and personnel network supplies the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has become the on-the-ground muscle behind anti-AI-data-center activism in 14+ states. - Net effect so far: ~$23.6B in delayed or blocked data center projects, 10 local moratoria, and one permanent ban. And now the adults have noticed: - A federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York is examining the money flows. - House Ways and Means subpoenaed three of the nonprofits after they turned over zero documents on $39M+ in funding. - Senate pressure from Cotton and Banks, and a FARA question nobody in the network wants to answer. Here’s the part nobody says out loud: this isn’t grassroots. It’s an influence operation with a balance sheet. They sue. They protest. They file. They stall. And the bill lands on American builders. For years, my partners, dozens of my companies, and I have been on the receiving end of these filings. We’ll keep building. The era of pretending this is organic is over. As of today, I’m $3,900 short on necessities, including housing. My four law firms have graciously agreed to defer payment until, God willing, my financial circumstances improve. After years devoted to caring for Yolanda, I am now beginning the difficult transition back to full-time work at ExponentialThink.com while grieving her loss. I am committed to rebuilding, but it will take time to catch up financially. In the meantime, if you are able to help, any amount would mean more than I can express. If giving isn’t possible, simply sharing our fundraiser can make a huge difference. Thank you for helping me find my footing during the hardest chapter of my life. 🙏🕊️❤️ GiveSendGo.com/TonyAndYoland…
2
86
209
5,506
zonulin retweeted
Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them. Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion. That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail. For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society." Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures. And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy. This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no." Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has. That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed. If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars. The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions. Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six. The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest. None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge. Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe. And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend. So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do. What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying. Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
46
718
2,060
34,417
zonulin retweeted
Norm Eisen just bragged that his midterm election lawsuits are "already written." I wonder why he's so confident? Let's dig a littler deeper, shall we?

BLACK-ROBED COLOR REVOLUTION. PT4

THE DEMOCRACY FILES- BENCH SIDE, PART 4: NORM EISEN, CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS, PRE-WRITTEN MIDTERM LAWSUITS & THE FEDERAL WORKER SABOTAGE PLOT I thought Part 3 may be the finale. Then

19
305
533
22,994
Conspirators' Coalition? Holder's Real-Time Roleplaying with Activists! Vote like the country’s survival is at stake because it is. The war game session included a group of activist groups and experts from civil society. Former Attorney General Eric Holder discussed conducting war games or tabletop exercises to prepare for and combat potential election interference. These exercises involve strategizing against various scenarios, such as illegal ballot rejections, seizure of cast ballots, the deployment of the military, or misinformation campaigns. Holder worked with Hillary Clinton to conduct a tabletop exercise at his law firm's office. The session included a group of activist groups and experts from civil society. Holder has also engaged in similar exercises with members of Congress on Capitol Hill, specifically coordinating with Congressman Joe Morelli of New York, who was designated by Leader Hakeem Jeffries to lead these efforts. To increase the realism of these war games, they incorporated roleplaying elements, such as individuals acting as news anchors and presenting unconfirmed reports on screen to test how the group would respond in real time. Within their war games and tabletop exercises, participants considered the scenario of the President invoking the Insurrection Act to intervene in an electoral setting. Former Attorney General Eric Holder noted that while this falls into the outer reaches of potential threats, they have thought about and prepared to litigate and figure out ways in which they can push back on such an action. Holder further clarified that using such powers in peacetime during an election would be unprecedented, stating that really is using powers there that have never been used before in peacetime and with regard to an electoral setting.
34
154
203
17,393
Replying to @AlexanderSoros
Hello Alex Alex Alex, Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell. The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie. These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials. They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind." When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy." Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"? No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws. And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter. And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication. In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:" 🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe 🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity 🔹 French Legion of Honour Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive." Read that again. The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite. End democracy to save democracy itself. This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world. This is your legacy, Alex Soros. Your father spent his life fighting Communism. You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism. In the name of "democracy."
512
5,803
19,732
321,768
Holy Crap!
345
3,624
10,836
724,500
zonulin retweeted
Regardez bien ce qui s'est passé au Brésil dimanche. Les bureaux de vote ferment. Le dépouillement commence. Et là, un seul juge de la Cour suprême décide de prolonger le vote de deux heures, dans tout le pays. Le tribunal électoral suspend le comptage en urgence. Selon la presse brésilienne, ses propres membres étaient contre. Résultat : pour la première fois depuis le retour de la démocratie au Brésil, le candidat battu au premier tour remporte le second. Peut-être que tout est propre. Mais quand les règles d'un scrutin changent pendant le scrutin, sur décision d'un homme que personne n'a élu, la confiance meurt. Et une démocratie sans confiance n'est plus qu'un décor de théâtre. Maintenant, regardez qui applaudit. Alex Soros : « Félicitations au Brésil pour avoir, une fois de plus, tenu tête à l'autoritarisme. » Ursula von der Leyen : « La démocratie et le multilatéralisme ont gagné. » Pedro Sánchez, à un mois de ses propres élections, annonce que « la remontée mondiale du progressisme » va arriver en Espagne. Ils ne se cachent même plus. L'autoritarisme, c'est un peuple qui vote mal. La démocratie, c'est un juge qui garde les urnes ouvertes jusqu'à ce que le résultat soit le bon. Ils ont compris une chose : le réel est contre eux. L'immigration, l'insécurité, le déclassement, la dette. Le réel est trop fort, trop violent, et sur le terrain des idées, ils ne gagnent plus. Alors le combat se déplace : les tribunaux, les procédures, les horaires, les inéligibilités. En France, on connaît déjà la musique. On a déjà vu des juges décider de qui a le droit de se présenter. Le Brésil n'est pas une exception. C'est un prototype. Il y a de fortes chances que ce scénario se rejoue partout en Occident, dans chaque pays où ils n'ont pas encore perdu. Alors préparez-vous. Pas seulement à faire campagne : à protéger le scrutin. Des assesseurs dans chaque bureau. Des avocats prêts le soir même. Chaque règle connue par cœur. Chaque procès-verbal photographié. Gagner ne suffira pas. Il faudra gagner avec une marge qu'aucun juge ne pourra effacer, et surveiller chaque urne jusqu'au dernier bulletin. Le réel est de notre côté. Encore faut-il qu'on nous laisse le compter.
Bukele l’a dit clairement : « Si vous n’impeachez pas les juges corrompus, vous NE POUVEZ PAS réformer le pays. Ils formeront un cartel (une dictature judiciaire) et bloqueront toutes les réformes. » Le Brésil vient de le montrer en direct. La France le pratique depuis des décennies, plus discrètement. Le suffrage universel n’a de sens que si le dernier mot appartient aux élus, pas à un réseau de magistrats irrévocables qui interprètent les règles selon leurs intérêts. Sans destitution réelle des juges politiques, les élections restent un théâtre. Le cartel reste en place. A bon entendeur.
426
7,886
24,228
370,520
zonulin retweeted
PAY ATTENTION, AMERICA: ESPECIALLY MICHIGAN AND TEXAS - STUDY WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN BRAZIL - THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR COUNTRY! Brazil is following Venezuela's path, and the same terror network is already at work here. Lula, an 80-year-old leftist who spent 580 days in prison on major Car Wash corruption convictions, just won a fourth term. In 2021 Brazil’s Supreme Court overturned those convictions on a technicality (the original court lacked jurisdiction). It was not a finding of innocence. The convictions that made him ineligible were wiped out, allowing him to run for President again. Many of the judges Lula or his party had nominated during his earlier years in power. Flávio Bolsonaro (Jair’s son) won the first round outright, roughly 47% to Lula’s 45%. On election day, the Supreme Court ordered a last-minute two-hour nationwide voting extension right around the scheduled 5 p.m. closing time. The justice who issued it was Cristiano Zanin - Lula’s former personal lawyer in the Car Wash cases, whom Lula later appointed to the court. Result: Lula ~51.8%, Flávio ~48.2%. Flávio Bolsonaro has refused to concede. He says he will not recognize the result and is seeking annulment of the runoff. He called the extension an unprecedented mid-game rule change by a conflicted justice that broke equal treatment between voters and created chaos at polling places. Jair Bolsonaro is still locked up. He is serving a 27-year sentence for the alleged “coup” after 2022. Because of serious health problems (nearly killed in a 2018 stabbing by a Lula-type supporter, later treated for pneumonia), he is under house arrest with ongoing restrictions (ankle monitor, limits on visitors and communication). He cannot vote, run, or be free. This is the playbook we documented in 2021. In Venezuela a left-dominated Supreme Court paved the way for Hugo Chávez. In Brazil the court nullified the Car Wash convictions, released Lula, and put the institutions that count and certify votes under its control. After Bolsonaro’s 2018 win, it acted as the opposition, censoring critics, investigating supporters, and blocking efforts to make the electronic voting system auditable. The same Marxist and Islamic networks are already operating in America and they are celebrating this. George Soros and the groups he funds, along with progressive NGOs, activist judges, and left-wing operatives, spend heavily to reshape courts, prosecutors, and rules. Candidates like Talerico in Texas and Abdul in Michigan fit the model: the same institutional-capture playbook that just locked in another Lula term in Brazil. They do not need to win every argument with voters. They change the machinery so ordinary people lose control. Brazil is the preview. Read the 2021 RAIR Foundation article “Brazil Under Attack.” Vote. Show up. Organize. Do not wait. Read here: rairfoundation.com/brazil-un…
Lula Lula Lula! Congrats to Brazil for standing up against authoritarianism once again! 🇧🇷 ⚖️✌️
240
3,462
9,098
176,708
zonulin retweeted
New low for normalized Jew-hate in the American Democratic Party. Very sad: Painting your political opponents as puppets of Jews, as this El-Sayed ad does, and as crazed baby-killers and money-grubbing villains who are the root cause of every bad thing not just in the world, but in your life—from wars to the price of eggs to the reason you can’t have free healthcare—is not just low-grade Jew-hate. It’s pure Third Reich stuff, translated directly from the original German. Do you remember when Jewish Democrats in Michigan explained that they would vote for El-Sayed despite his open disdain for Jews, since there are many other important issues they need him to fight for? That anything was worth it to “defeat MAGA”? Well, here’s El-Sayed’s answer to them: Don’t worry, all those issues we agree on, like healthcare, inflation, and climate change, I’m going to make them about Jews too! I will tell the public that the Jews are the reason they can’t have those things.
1,074
1,049
5,517
2,275,627
That math ain’t mathing.
Election STOLEN? 1st round Bolsonaro received 56.1m votes 1st round LULA received 53.8mi votes Runner up candidates in 3rd & 4th received 6m votes BOTH THESE Candidates ENDORSED BOLSONARO IN THE RUNOFF FINAL VOTE Bolsonaro received 59.7m(+3.6m) Lula received 64.1m(+10.2m).
20
178
517
7,941
zonulin retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: Right-wing Brazilian businessman and Flávio Bolsonaro ally Pablo Marçal ERUPTS outside Bolsonaro's election-night headquarters after Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin — Lula's former personal lawyer — extended voting hours AFTER polls had already closed "The decision arrives at 5:04 p.m. without notification to the Electoral Court or any state court — the voting machines were already closed, and there is NO WAY to open a machine back up again!" "Who left their voting machines open past the deadline? The machines had to be closed and sealed at 5:00 p.m. sharp! I want to know which voting machines are still open — we have to put a MAGNIFYING GLASS on those machines!" "Only 17 cities were requested on one side [for storms] and Lula's party requested two — 17 plus 2 is 19. Now to leave all 5,569 cities in Brazil waiting is ABSURD!" "Whenever they are losing, they always act like this!" He nailed the biggest question of the night: why were ANY precincts still unsealed past 5PM when everyone who followed the law was already locked out? THIS IS A STRAIGHT UP COUP. RIGGING THE ELECTION. If Bolsonaro wins tonight it will be a comeback of the ages! x.com/SamPancher/status/2114…
302
5,048
17,344
698,393
Mayor Mamdani just made a video explaining your rights when ICE shows up. Great. Everyone should know their rights. But he left out something VERY important. What ICE is legally allowed to do. Let me explain what he didn't. 1. ARE YOU SAFE FROM ICE INSIDE A CHURCH, HOSPITAL, OR WORKPLACE? NO. ICE can generally enter places open to the public. A hospital waiting room? YES. A church service open to the public? YES. A store or restaurant? YES. They generally don't need a warrant to enter those public areas. Your home and private rooms are different. Those have stronger legal protections. ICE generally needs a judge's warrant, permission, or a valid emergency exception to enter. But simply walking into a church or hospital does NOT make you untouchable. A church is not an ICE-free zone. 2. CAN YOU JUST STAY SILENT AND WALK AWAY? Not necessarily. You have the right to remain silent. Absolutely. You can also ask, "Am I free to go?" If the officer says yes, you can leave. But if the officer says NO? You can't simply decide the law no longer applies to you. Federal law allows ICE to arrest people without a judicial warrant under certain conditions. Your right to remain silent is NOT a right to avoid lawful arrest. 3. IF THE NYPD REFUSES TO HELP ICE, DOES THAT STOP ICE? NO. New York City can generally refuse to help enforce federal civil immigration law. That's the city's choice. But ICE works for the FEDERAL government. Not the mayor. Not City Hall. Mamdani cannot cancel federal law. It's really that simple. 4. CAN YOU PROTEST AGAINST ICE? YES. Peaceful protests are protected by the Constitution. But physically blocking a lawful arrest? NO. The right to protest is not the right to break the law. Now, Mayor Mamdani. Here's my question. Why did you spend your video explaining what ICE cannot do, while barely mentioning what ICE CAN legally do? Immigrants have constitutional rights. Of course they do. Nobody is denying that. But having rights doesn't mean federal immigration law suddenly stops applying to you. And refusing to cooperate with ICE doesn't make ICE disappear. Here's the part that really bothers me. You're sitting comfortably in front of a camera, telling people how to deal with federal agents. But you're not the one who may face those agents. They are. You get the likes. You get the applause. You get to look like a hero. And if someone misunderstands your advice, THEY face the consequences. If you really care about these people, tell them everything. What their rights are. What ICE can legally do. And what could happen if they misunderstand the difference. Because giving people half the truth and calling it protection isn't leadership. It's political theater. And you're using other people's futures as your stage.
If you encounter ICE, here's what every New Yorker should know.
116
541
3,963
269,520
zonulin retweeted
It really is like the CIA is creating them in a lab! ☠️
1,308
6,878
35,216
470,309
zonulin retweeted
Meat should be baby's FIRST food. Not infant cereal. How dare I? Read on... Researchers at the University of Colorado tested it. 88 breastfed babies. Half got pureed beef as their first food. Half got iron-fortified infant cereal. At 7 months, the cereal babies got 0.6 mg of zinc a day from solid food. That's about 25% of what they need. The beef babies got 1.9 mg. More than 3 times as much. The beef babies also had more head growth from 7 to 12 months. And the babies took the beef just as well as the cereal. "But cereal has iron!" Iron sprayed onto starch. Iron is absorbed at 14 to 18% from diets with meat, and only 5 to 12% from vegetarian diets. Meat itself helps you absorb iron. Cereal doesn't. A growing brain needs protein, fat, zinc and iron. Infant cereal is starch (sugar) with iron added... Meat is a health food. For babies too. Read the actual studies. Links below...
77
664
2,940
51,874