HOY UNA INDUSTRIA ENTERA DEJÓ DE TENER SENTIDO alguien subió a GitHub un repo que coge cualquier foto y te devuelve un mundo 3d explorable: mallas con físicas, splat del fondo, audio ambiente. todo. entra una imagen. sale un mundo. cinco minutos. la gente que lleva diez años aprendiendo Blender se ha pasado el día mirando esto en silencio. se llama image-blaster. os dejo el repo abajo.

Ok, fine. I’ll weigh in. 1. The Equal Time statute doesn’t apply to GameDay for several reasons. For one, when it passed the statute, Congress applied it to broadcast tv stations—not cable programs like GameDay. For another, Congress stated that the statute only applies to legally qualified candidates. The Senator is not one. 2. The Equal Time statute does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others. Indeed, when the statute applies, it simply requires broadcast stations to offer comparable time and placement. And comparable does not necessarily mean an interview by the same person on the same program either. 3. This ties back to Talarico. He’s just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations—he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings. 4. More broadly, though, at least some people appear to take issue with a cable program choosing to interview one government official and not others. To the extent they’re pushing for greater balance in media, that might be a good thing. But to bring this back to the law, cable shows are different than broadcast programs. Broadcasters are unique. The FCC gave them free licenses worth many billions of dollars to use a public resource (spectrum). They are given a government sanctioned monopoly on their broadcast frequencies, too. If anyone else wants to use that same public resource (spectrum) for the purpose of expressing their own views, the government will not let them—it will eject anyone else that tries to use a broadcaster’s licensed spectrum. This means that Americans are subsidizing the distribution of broadcast programs over a public resource to the tune of many billions of dollars. We don’t do that with cable or anything else. In exchange for that free and exclusive right to use spectrum, broadcasters made a deal with the American people. They agreed to operate, not in their own narrow interests, but in the public interest. There are various rules and policies that they must follow. This sets them apart from newspapers and cable shows and podcasts. But some broadcasters want to break their deal with the American people. They want to keep their free access to billions of dollars worth of spectrum, of course. They are less eager these days to abide by their public interest obligations. Yet the Supreme Court has already ruled that holding broadcasters to their public interest obligations is not censorship or any sort of 1A violation. And Congress has charged the FCC with ensuring that broadcasters meet those public interest obligations, as required by their licenses. The agency should do so.

a good reminder that just because someone states their opinion with intense conviction, does not make it fact. they can come back a year later and state the absolute opposite view with the same conviction.

Just built my first Omarchy plugin! This also happens to be the first piece of software I've ever made solo entirely with AI. Back-and-forth over English and nothing else. So two firsts for me. Super fun experience. Here's a quick little tour. Hope you dig it.

ReactOS 0.4.16 Released With New Graphical Installer, Better Hardware Support Awesome update @reactos phoronix.com/news/ReactOS-0.…

This is a pretty big shift in U.S. cyber policy. The White House is setting up a program that would let private cybersecurity companies conduct government-authorized operations against foreign cybercriminal groups, including surveillance and disruption of their infrastructure. Not exactly “hack back,” but definitely a major expansion of the private sector’s role in offensive cyber operations. whitehouse.gov/presidential-…

Now do Lenovo/Superfish. They broke security so they could watch your internet browsing, and inject ads into other site's web pages. Even over HTTPS. They used a trusted root certificate, with a private key protected by a weak password, allowing anyone to decrypt your traffic.