Stop supporting businesses which don't hire South Africans‼️

The same thing was found sometime in the 90s

We are more interested in knowing what’s the difference between an asylum seeker and illegal immigrant when 96% of asylum applications are rejected.

Pretorians please make sure you avail yourselves 📍

If SA doesn't benefit SAns , no one should benefit from SA 🇿🇦

In a country with 60% youth unemployment and the most inequality in the world, we still have people in leadership obsessed with “international obligations” Guys please go out in numbers and get these people out of power.

This Home Affairs directive on asylum applications is institutional suicide. Reward illegal entry with automatic processing and you completely erase any distinction between legal immigration and border jumping. You can’t build a secure sovereign state while giving a free pass to anyone who circumvents official ports of entry.

Apartheid was constitutional. It was the rule of law.

Justice Mlambo was trained by Soros funded Legal Resources Centre and current trustee of Legal Resources Centre so it's no surprise that refugees are his personal advocacy

Little known fact: 15 years ago (2011) asylum seekers could not apply for any form of social relief from SA Gov. Scalabrini Centre & Another v Minister of Social Development (June 2020) changed that & they qualify for SRD Grant. It always starts out as impossible until it isn't

Colleagues, as agreed, I put this together specifically to make it easier for other South Africans to participate in the public-comment process on the Employment Services Amendment Bill [B 16–2026]... This is a draft submission on the Bill, setting out concerns, comments and recommendations on its provisions. You may use my submission as a guide, copy and paste the sections that reflect your views, an adapt them to make the submission your own. Please take the time to read it, understand its contents, and submit it in your own name and in your own capacity docs.google.com/document/d/1…

The Constitutional Court is invalid and unconstitutional

South Africa needs to settle the contradiction between immigration policy and constitutional refugee protections. You cannot have immigration laws designed to regulate who may enter, remain and work in the country, while judicial interpretations continually expand protections around those very areas without clearly defining the limits. The result? A system that becomes increasingly difficult to enforce.

In @ParliamentofRSA today, Hon. @ZungulaVuyo raised a critical issue: The Employment Services Bill directive wants to treat asylum seekers as NOT foreigners, giving them the right to work. With 95% of asylum claims not genuine and a 5-year backlog, this will worsen unemployment and sideline South Africans. We told the Minister @1Khosi_Meth directly: Remove asylum seekers from that definition. Protect South African jobs! 🎥 Watch the full intervention here:

What I don't understand about this immigration circus is, we cannot provide jobs and services for our own people. Yet we open the borders for other people who will compete for the same scarce resources. And their home countries is thousands of miles away.

ActionSA views with grave concern the new Department of Home Affairs directive instructing Refugee Reception Offices to accept asylum applications from undocumented persons, including those who entered South Africa illegally, entered outside designated ports of entry, possess no visa or failed to declare their intention to seek asylum upon entering the country. While we recognise that the Department is implementing the Constitutional Court’s July 2026 Scalabrini judgment, ActionSA believes the practical consequences of this directive will be disastrous for South Africans if implemented through a broken asylum system that is already overwhelmed and a border-management system that remains severely constrained. - Lerato Ngobeni, ActionSA Parliamentary Chief Whip Read More: actionsa.org.za/actionsa-war…

We have just cautioned the Dpt of Employment & Labour on the exclusion of Asylum seekers in the definition of foreign nationals. Home Affairs has stated 95% of asylum seekers are denied as they are not legitimate. Given how it takes years for Home Affairs to make a decision on asylum applications, the holder of a section 22 permit can be entitled to work. That opens doors for companies to legally sideline local labour in favour of foreign labour which is subject to exploitation.

Conflicting judgements show that judges have conflicts of interests and some are serving foreign interests