This was Zohran Mamdani only 13 days after October 7. No one could have predicted that this unhinged radical would become New York's next mayor. Israel had not yet launched its ground invasion into Gaza and he was already screaming genocide tnx @mazemoore for that video

Hmmm.....a lot of commercials lately for UNCF. Makes me wonder about things. I searched and can't find UCCF nor UHCF. Can't even find UWCF.

How many oil refineries were there in Calif when you were sworn into office? (18) How many are there today? (11) How many gallons of gas did Calif produce when you were sworn into office? (14.5 billion gallons) How many gallons of gas does Calif produce today? (11.5 billion). Gavin Newsom -- closed 7 refineries and reduced production of gasoline in Calif by more than 20% Trump didn't do that -- gasoline refining is a state level business. Newsom did it.

Remember who REFUSED to stand for a 13-year-old boy fighting cancer whose dream is to be a cop? Remember who REFUSED to stand for a wounded warrior who earned our nation’s highest honor? That would be DEMOCRATS. They sat. We stood!

To the Uknown Juror, I do not know your name and we have never met. I am writing anyway because what you did in that jury room matters. You sat through weeks of evidence about Cora, Dawson, and Callan—three children who were strangled in their own home. You then spent days in deliberations with eleven other people who wanted to walk away without holding their killer criminally responsible. You did not join them. You held the line. That took more courage than most people will ever have to show. The pressure you faced was obvious from the outside. Nine of the twelve jurors were women. The defense and much of the commentary around the case treated postpartum as an automatic get-out-of-accountability card. When the split became public, the lawyer for the woman who killed those children went after you personally and tried to have you removed. You still would not vote to acquit. That is not stubbornness. That is a man who looked at three dead children and refused to pretend the law required him to look away. You were one vote standing between a unanimous finding of “not criminally responsible” and a hung jury. You chose the hung jury. You chose not to cave. In a room that had already decided the outcome, you chose the children over the narrative. That is rare. It is also why I am proud of you. You are a hero to people who still believe that strangling a five-year-old, a three-year-old, and an eight-month-old baby is a crime that requires an answer, not an excuse. Thank you for standing there when it would have been easier to fold. Thank you for being a man that defends children.

Kevin Reddington just outed the holdout. It’s a man. He won’t return not guilty. And the defense is furious. Reddington’s pitch: this juror is “refusing to follow the law,” so yank him. Translation: eleven people wanted Lindsay Clancy to walk, one wouldn’t, and now they want the hero kicked off the panel for not collapsing under majority pressure. Three murdered kids. One man who wouldn’t fold. That’s not a rogue juror. That’s a backbone.

The Clancy case highlights so many completely separate issues that converged in a horrific moment of the slaughter of the innocent. Did she commit murder? Yes. Was she suffering from mental illness? Quite possibly. Was that mental illness caused by the drugs she was taking or at least exacerbated by them? Why are we not taking mental illness more seriously in this country? Did we learn anything about the sheer ruthless greed of Big Pharma during the COVID scam? Has society as a whole gone “off the rails” with prescribed medications? Have abortion and legalized marijuana laws taken the governor off the common sense pedal in our brains? If there is an option for Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity, why is there no option for Guilty, but Criminally Insane? Will this society ever recover from the madness of the left?

People will bend themselves into pretzels to blame “hormones” when a mother strangles her three babies Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and 8-month-old Callan then try to off herself. Postpartum psychosis is real and rare. That doesn’t turn filicide into a sad medical footnote. Three children are still dead. Same crowd will tell you a man taking cross-sex hormones is a woman, period. Then they’ll snap that men have “no right” to talk about postpartum depression because they can’t give birth. Biology is ironclad when it shuts men up. Biology is optional when it lets a man claim womanhood. Pick a lane. Now some are floating that she was “driven to it” because her husband had an affair. That’s the new standard? Marriage goes sour, skip the lawyers, just kill the kids. Divorce exists. Murder is still murder. This is the psychological break: evil gets a hall pass the second it fits the preferred story. Hormones excuse her. Hormones validate him. An affair excuses the bodies in the basement. Convenient morality isn’t morality. It’s just looking the other way when the victims are small and the narrative is useful Three children didn’t get a vote. They got exercise bands around their necks. That’s the part that shouldn’t be negotiable. I want nothing to do with anyone, male or female who excuses vile abhorrent evil behavior.

These children were murdered. That is an indisputable fact. They were murdered by the woman who gave them life. That is an indisputable fact. The issue obsessing the usual suspects on the left is when is murder of the innocent acceptable. It has been their banner for decades now.

One juror stood up for three children who were murdered by their mother. ONE. When did we stop protecting children at all costs? #IamTheHoldout

One hero did it.

Lindsay Clancy’s attorney: “Lindsay is like a daughter to me” “I want to meet the holdout juror” “Lindsay deserved that acquittal” “Lindsay was robbed” What about the babies she strangled to death, Mr, Pink Tie? Do they matter? Did they deserve a torturous death? I can’t believe this is real life.

NOTE TO RYAN Ryan Reynolds just informed America that the 1980s were a “brutal, brutal time.” A “fucking mess.” Socio-political tensions everywhere. Fresh off the Cuban Missile Crisis. All we remember is “Top Gun” and cocaine. Dude. Turn in your man card. I was a young, single Air Force pilot in the 80s. Charleston AFB. C-141. First lieutenant turning captain. The Cold War was real and we were winning it. Reagan was in the White House. The music was legendary. The cars were American and loud. And we partied. The beaches were empty enough that a guy finishing a long trip could still find a parking spot and a cold beer. I flew out of Charleston, hit the beaches, cranked Springsteen and Van Halen, and dated girls who didn’t need a 47-page consent form. We had call signs, shrimp & grits, great beer, and the quiet confidence that the country we served actually liked itself. Reynolds grew up in Vancouver watching bootleg “Ghostbusters” tapes. That’s fine. But lecturing Americans about the decade we actually lived in (while promoting a movie that leans hard into 80s cool) is peak Hollywood. I know. I used to live there. He thinks we paved over trauma with puppy dogs and ice cream. We just remember being young, free, and flying. And freaking loving it! The 80s weren’t trauma. They were a blast. Top Gun was a documentary with better hair. Your move, Deadpool. 🫡🇺🇸​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Canadian asswipe.

The left created this little guy to insult us. We adopted him.

Teddy Roosevelt had it so right‼️‼️ In 1919, days before he died, Theodore Roosevelt wrote: “If the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else… But this is predicated upon the person becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag…🇺🇸 We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.” Equal rights. Undivided loyalty. That was the deal. 🔥🔥🔥 #American #TeddyRoosevelt #OneFlag #OneLanguage #OneLoyalty

From Kim Strassel's column in Friday's WSJ -- a more accurate description would be hard to come up with: "The state of legal reporting has reached peak national embarrassment, a master class in fiction that rivals the reporting about Russia “collusion” and Joe Biden’s undiminished capacity. The media’s contribution to lawfare began in the earliest days of the first Trump term and has become only more brazen. The swings and misses are there for all to see, every day. Yet the formula is now so routine that nobody pushes back." Seems to be available for all to read. wsj.com/opinion/the-medias-l…

ABOUT LAKE AMERICA What's the name of the river that separates Texas from Mexico? The Rio Grande? That's right. The Rio Grande. If you're standing on the north bank. But if you wade across and stand on the south bank, what's its name then? If you say, "The Rio Grande," you're an American. But if you say, "The Rio Bravo," you're a Mexican. Because that one river has two names. One officially recognized by the American government and one officially recognized by the Mexican government. Kind of like the Persian Gulf. On its eastern shores it is the Persian Gulf, on its western shores it is the Arabian Gulf. One body of water, two names, reflecting the values, heritage and pride of the nations which surround it. A last example: The South China Sea. One body of water, officially known as the South China Sea to China, the East Sea to Vietnam and the West Sea to the Philippines. Which means if Canada wants to call the easternmost body of fresh water between itself and the United States Lake Ontario, and the United States wants to call that same body of fresh water Lake America, it would be in keeping with a practice established around the world for centuries. Kind of like the practice of governments changing the names of geographical features for political reasons, like Presidents Obama and Biden did some 650 times. You knew that, right? In the last two Democrat administrations, the federal government went on a spree, scrubbing the map of names, people, words and races it found politically unacceptable. Remember Mount McKinley, Point Barrow, Squaw Peak and Fort Polk? So, the precedent is broadly and repeatedly established by Barack Obama and Joe Biden -- a president can name any damn thing any damn thing for any damn reason. Like Trump did. Like Trump trolled Democrats into believing he did. It's like he's got a laser pointer and they're a roomful of cats. He plays them like a fish. He posts on Truth Social and they shit their pants. He scribbles with his giant Sharpie and their heads explode. He says something about Lake Ontario and they completely forget the six-month anniversary of the Iran War. The Democrats and their puppets on the evening news. Moron politicians with social media posts from the shore, breathless reporters doing Man On The Street with men on the beach, indignant Canadians spitting on America, earnest Native Americans explaining etymology. He leads them around by the nose. "Republicans take Trump seriously, but not literally," a smart man said. "Democrats take Trump literally, not not seriously." And so he trolls them, for fun and sport. And distraction. Because the same Democrats and reporters who seem to believe Trump gives a damn what Lake Ontario is called are completely oblivious to the real issue at hand -- which is how the Canadians have lived like leeches off American prosperity for generations. Take 2025, for example. Last year, Canada's trade surplus with the United States was about $150 billion. That means that as a result of trade between the two nations, they ended up $150 billion richer and we ended up $150 billion poorer. That happens because they rip us off. They rig the game to enrich themselves and impoverish us. That grabbing of American cash becomes more galling when you look at the rest of Canada's top-10 trading relationships, in which it runs a trade deficit with every nation except the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. In fact, if it wasn't ripping the United States off for $150 billion a year, Canada would run a net trade deficit with the world, meaning that each year it would export wealth and become poorer and poorer. But it takes our money to paper over its weakness. If it wasn't siphoning off America's prosperity through unfair trade practices, Canada would fall on its financial face. We carry it on our backs, at the expense of American jobs and prosperity. And that's what has Trump pissed off. That is what he cares about. No matter what you call the lake.

Federal Judges BLOCK illegals from being deported! Federal Judges BLOCK criminals from going to jail! Federal Judges BLOCK fraud from being stopped! Federal Judges BLOCK construction on federal projects! Federal Judges BLOCK laws that would prevent election fraud! I’m tired of the rogue liberal Judges! 🥴

This is awesome.

You guys think we’re up there napping, talking shit, and drinking coffee.🤣 While that might be true (😎), we’ve got lots going on up front, too. ❤️