“Daddy was visibly Jewish.” That is what Albert Itzkowitz’s daughter said through tears. Albert was 75. He owned a kosher bakery in Queens. He served as a rabbi at a nursing home. He volunteered as an EMT. He was a grandfather. On May 18, he went to Kissena Park, where he used to spend quiet time on his lunch break. He brought a chair and a crossword puzzle. He was found shot in the neck and back. Murdered. Now his children are asking anyone who saw something to come forward. More than a month later, there is still no arrest. There is now a $20,000 reward for information leading to an arrest. Somebody knows something. Say his name. Albert Itzkowitz. Do not let his family demand justice alone.

The complaint reveals the depth of the rot. A NYT newsroom employee reported anti-Israel bias at least 15 times to HR and internal standards channels. HR responded: “If you don’t like our values here, maybe you should go find a place whose values align with yours.”

I didn’t go on @CNN to tell people what they wanted to hear. I went to tell the truth as I’ve witnessed it firsthand. I’ve spent years on the ground, speaking directly with Israelis and Muslims in Judea and Gaza. Truth doesn’t become less true because it makes people uncomfortable, and I’ll never stay silent simply because the room disagrees. Thank you, Ambassador @GovMikeHuckabee, for standing with those willing to speak plainly.

Brooke Goldstein sat on a CNN panel and did the one thing that table almost never allows. She spoke as someone who actually went. Two years in and out of Jenin, Ramallah, Tulkarem, and Nablus. Interviews with Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, not through a press release and not through a translator who works for the story. They told her to her face that they want war. That is not a talking point she invented in a green room. That is what they said. The rest of the table looked the way people look when the script gets interrupted. They have never been in Samaria or Judea. They have never watched the propaganda machine operate on the ground and then come home to hear it repeated as news. They sit on a sofa in a studio and decide what Israel is allowed to do, while the people who have been there keep getting treated as the problem for noticing that this is an ideology that teaches children to love death and then parks those children in front of the launcher. She said the quiet part without raising her voice. It is not only Hamas. It is what the schools print. It is what the commanders admit. It is why there can be food in the Strip and still be starvation, because Hamas treats the warehouse the same way it treats the tent. CNN will air the clip, then go back to calling itself journalism, and still act wounded the next time someone says the network is selling a product instead of a report. @GoldsteinBrooke already did the work they refuse to do. They just did not like hearing it at their own table.

Ms Rachel: “I got in so much trouble because I said these kids [in Gaza] are starving… And they’re like, ‘But they have pre-existing conditions.’ Why does that even matter?” WHY DOES IT MATTER? It matters because those children were being held up as proof that Israel was starving Gaza. It matters because cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, malabsorption and other serious conditions can themselves cause malnutrition. It matters because nearly 1.5 millions tons of food aid had entered Gaza by July 2025. It matters because 22,000 tons of food aid were delivered since May 21 alone. It matters because while Gazan kids needed medical care Hamas was using hospitals for military purposes. It matters because YOU used sick children to sell the starvation lie. honestreporting.com/the-medi…

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said: “I have never seen killing and destruction like Gaza in all my years as Secretary-General.” According to even the most critical reports, Guterres, 70,000 people were killed in the war in Gaza, a large proportion of them Hamas terrorists. During your years as Secretary-General: more than 600,000 people were massacred or starved to death in Ethiopia. 377,000 died in Yemen — that figure appears in reports issued by your own organization. 150,000 were killed in Sudan and 12 million were displaced. Hundreds of thousands have been buried in Ukraine. You didn’t see it? They died before your eyes. You simply looked the other way, because the Jews couldn’t be blamed.

I back Robert Kraft banning Macklemore from performing at Gillette 1000% and thank him for having a spine when many others in his shoes don’t.

What the f**k is this, @nytimes?

The “film” NAZA is pure propaganda, created by radicals who serve the narrative of murderous terrorists. It is yet another element of the anti-Israel campaign that began after October 7, driven by the Red-Green coalition of the radical left and Islamist movements. The "film" is fake, built on falsehoods and distortions of the truth, with the clear purpose of fueling anti-Israel sentiment and contributing to the demonization and dehumanization of Israel. Throughout the film, serious allegations are based on anonymous sources, without credible evidence or supporting documentation. For example, the "film" claims that the IDF approved a planned strike despite anticipating 500 civilian deaths. This is false. It never happened. Never. The IDF would never approve such an operational plan. But there is a reason - and a method - behind the dissemination of such an outrageous allegation. The method employed throughout this campaign, including in this "film," is familiar: introduce a shocking falsehood, amplify it around the world, and allow it to shape headlines and public opinion. By the time the facts emerge and corrections follow, the damage to Israel’s image has already been done. Again and again, false accusations against Israel receive immediate global attention, while their subsequent collapse receives only a fraction of the exposure and impact. This film follows precisely the same pattern. The same applies to another false accusation - that the IDF allows AI systems to make operational decisions independently of human judgment. This is simply false and fundamentally misrepresents how the IDF operates. Operational decisions are made within a defined human chain of command and are subject to human judgment and oversight. The IDF has developed extensive procedures intended to prevent and mitigate harm to non-combatants. The truth is the opposite of what the "film" seeks to portray. And yes, in Israel’s democracy, where freedom of expression is cherished, there are also radical Israelis who lie, distort facts seeking political goals and personal gains. The "film"’s co-director, Yuval Abraham, is no neutral investigative journalist - he is a longtime radical anti-Israeli activist committed to demonizing and delegitimizing Israel. As part of this method, the film creators deliberately omit Hamas from their narrative, erasing the terrorist organization whose actions are at the heart of this war. Hamas deliberately targets Israeli civilians, as it did on October 7, while embedding itself within Gaza’s civilian population and using civilians as human shields. Israel is fighting this bloodthirsty jihadist terrorist organization while the IDF operates in accordance with international law and takes extensive measures to minimize civilian harm.

This sentiment is EXACTLY what gets Jewish people assaulted and murdered in the streets. The issue is not “children shouldn’t be killed”. Give me a break. The issue is Macklemore a) is a virulent Jew hater who has appeared onstage in Jewface mocking Jews and b) spreads completely untrue libels about Jews and Israel from the stage of an Ed Sheeran concert. Imagine if some random opener started talking about how Black people are all rapists and “white women deserve to be safe” and a Black venue owner didn’t want that performer in his venue. And your response would be “the Black guy canceled him for saying white women should be safe.” This is what you sound like to Jews.

The New York Times coverage of the Gaza-Israel war was grossly pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, according to a peer-reviewed study. Jewish casualties were omitted or minimized while Palestinian casualties were amplified and misrepresented. Yale University Professor Edieal Pinker published the review in the an academic journal Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. His peer-reviewed research quantitatively evaluated 1,559 New York Times articles published between October 7, 2023, and June 7, 2024, to assess potential narrative imbalances. The study found that: - 91% of the analyzed articles failed to mention Israeli casualties that occurred after October 7. - 1,423 articles completely omitted mentions of both Israeli post-Oct. 7 casualties and Hamas combatant deaths. - 50% of the articles did not reference the Israeli hostages held by Hamas during the fighting, and 41% omitted mentions of the Israeli casualties from the initial October 7 attack itself. - Personal stories highlighting Palestinian and Lebanese suffering appeared on average two out of every three days. Comparable accounts of Israeli suffering unrelated directly to the October 7 events appeared in very few articles. - The word "Israel" appeared 27,205 times across the dataset, compared to just 8,499 mentions of "Hamas," meaning Israel was mentioned more than three times as often. This statistical discrepancy places near-exclusive agency and responsibility on Israel while severely diminishing Hamas's role in sustaining the conflict. Pinker concluded that these consistent editorial choices cultivated a dominant narrative portraying Israel as the sole aggressor facing few consequences beyond losing international sympathy, while Palestinians were predominantly framed as passive victims. He argues that the coverage deprives readers of a comprehensive understanding of the ongoing combat dynamics and the continuous nature of Israeli losses. Following the initial release of the study data, The New York Times publicly defended its reporting, claiming it has covered the war with rigor and from all angles. Of course my commentary on their reporting shows that this defense is hot garbage. The New York Times buried the Holocaust in the back pages and then doubled down on downplaying Jewish suffering after October 7. They are a disgusting business that should be boycotted.

Tucker Carlson, on the 25th anniversary of 9/11, has come out in open solidarity with pro-jihadist Senate Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, arguing that America has engaged in terrorism far greater than 9/11. Tucker and Hasan Piker hold hands on this. It might be time for certain major Republican figures to explain why his views aren’t “completely anathema to conservatism.”

Yesterday, a film accusing Israel of genocide premiered. It’s a horrific blood libel against our sons and daughters. What makes it especially painful and infuriating is that this lie comes from Israeli filmmakers and is now being spread around the world. Let’s get the facts straight: On October 7th, Hamas invaded Israel to murder Jews. Hamas terrorists slaughtered children in front of their parents and parents in front of their children. They burned homes, raped women, and kidnapped babies, children and elderly people. Then Hamas fled back to Gaza and deliberately hid behind its own civilians, using them as human shields in homes, schools, and hospitals. And when Israel fights back, and civilians are tragically killed in this terrible war, Israel is accused of “genocide.” There is no magic button that can destroy Hamas, or any terrorist organization hiding behind civilians, without harming a single civilian. It simply does not exist. In interviews with the international media, I always ask: “What would you do?” They never have an answer. If Israel wanted to hurt the people of Gaza, we would not send our sons and daughters to fight house to house, through alleyways and tunnels, at the terrible cost of our own soldiers being killed and wounded. We would not warn civilians before strikes and evacuate them from combat zones. We would not help vaccinate hundreds of thousands of children in Gaza against polio. The war in Gaza is terrible. The death of every child is a tragedy. But a terrible war is not genocide. Even now, Hamas doesn’t regret October 7th. It’s rearming and waiting for another opportunity to carry out a massacre. The people standing between us and that next massacre are our soldiers and reservists. Our sons and daughters who put their lives at risk so that we can live here safely. I love them. I am proud of them. And I am deeply grateful to them. To portray them as perpetrators of “genocide” is not courageous art. It is a cowardly blood libel. And I will not remain silent.

Stop calling it "criticism." Erika hasn't merely been criticized. She's been accused of playing a role in her own husband's murder. She's been viciously attacked and maliciously slandered by shameless grifters who enjoy, and profit from, her suffering. And that's not hyperbole. Candace admitted that she relishes Erika's pain and hopes it never ends: "I want Erika to outlive everyone. Long live Erika Frantzve. Death is easy. Living a long life when everybody knows who and what you are, what you were a part of, and what you did . . . Long live Erika Frantzve." Calling this criticism is like calling torture discipline.

Wherever Jewish communities find themselves today celebrating Rosh Hashanah, know that I celebrate and will always stand with you and Israel. Shanah Tovah!

A gentle reminder that a sitting congressman named Tom Massie got his ass kicked, as a multi-term incumbent, in a deep red district, and is still whining about it. Tom is the biggest disappointment I saw in my team in DC. He’s nothing like he portrays himself to be. He’s a smart guy who plays dumb for clicks. He pretends to be a libertarian while using X to take away due process from people. He’s disgusting. Also, Tom was offered multiple briefings on cases he continues to incorrectly opine about and he refused. Tom was afraid of the truth, he chose clicks and ignorance instead. If you met the real Tom, you’d be disappointed too. Shame. He’s human garbage.

I’m honestly not understanding this reaction. To me it seems that if you are a headliner and your opening act is a hate-filled 1930s Nazi fest, then you bear the responsibility of not only having booked that act, but making sure that doesn’t happen again. And so there was silence from Ed Sheeran and it happened again the next night. Removing Macklemore is only part of the problem . It is Ed Sheeran himself.

Just a reminder that Candace Owens managed to get 4 teenagers arrested on 2 separate occasions in high school for being “racist” against her, sued the school district for discrimination in relation to the 2nd incident, and then went on to tell the world she never experienced racism growing up. Over and over again. One of the girls was a star basketball player who probably could have gotten a scholarship to play in college-maybe would have made to WNBA. She stopped playing after Candace got her arrested and suspended from the team. One of the boys she got arrested ended up changing his name after everything. This is who she has been her entire life.

I'll never get over the fact that Qatar's Defense Minister just casually posted this

Accountability is a healthy trait in any friendship. If your friend's views matter enough to negatively impact law and society then they matter enough to judge that friend's character. These aren't minor differences, folks. Trivializing this as a mere "disagreement" hides the real impact: We are talking about control of Congress, SCOTUS, national security, Second Amendment rights here.

The communist Islamic left is literally using Tucker Carlson to help defeat @MikeRogersForMI and get an Islamic jihadist who supports Sharia Law elected to the US Senate, and yet our Vice President @VP still refused to condemn Tucker Carlson today. When we lose the Senate are we really going to care about honoring peoples lame friendships? I care more our country than Tucker Carlson’s friendship and his feelings. When the jihadist wins, we will be lectured about how we can’t condemn Tucker because he’s friends with the VP. Even if we lose our country! We can’t condemn it! Doesn’t this just sound insane?