x.com/i/grok/share/d8532dec6… Grok: "This visualization challenges explanations relying solely on "background age effects" for the observed overall spikes, by showing the unvaccinated subset lacks them. The study's own Figure 3 confirms a strong overall age-related decline in SUD."

And now you understand why people have “gluten intolerance” and why the average age of cancer diagnosis has plummeted.

Last week the CVS pharmacist asked if I was there for the Covid/Flu shot. I responded that last year, people who took the flu shot were 27% more likely to get the flu and that I generally prefer to lower my risks. Her brain could not formulate a coherent response.

Alan Savory calls out modern “science” in brutal terms: “People come out of universities braindead… thinking science means peer-reviewed papers.” In this 1:34 clip he argues: Peer review often means “everybody already thought the same, so they approved it.” Real breakthroughs almost never come from the center of a profession — they come from the fringe, from outsiders, from people not blinded by consensus. The finest candle makers in history couldn't even imagine electric light — because they were trapped inside the accepted paradigm. His warning: “We're going to kill ourselves because of stupidity.” A fierce defense of real observation, thinking, and discussion — over credentialed groupthink. When has “peer-reviewed consensus” held back progress in your experience — or when has an outsider idea changed everything?

If you are able and willing to support me, please do. 🙏🙏 You can read my story here: kuno.anne.media/fundraiser/a…

So the US military put Ebola into airborne particles so animals could be infected by inhaling air. Vaxxed animals got hurt by inhalable Ebola worse than unvaxxed ones. Tony Fauci blows up, saying it all should have been classified to not undermine vaccine confidence.

A Delaware federal judge denied Pfizer, BioNTech, & Moderna’s bids to dismiss Bayer’s patent lawsuits over mRNA technology in their COVID-19 vaccines. The judge found they had not shown the patent was invalid or unused in their shots. Bayer claims the companies used 1980s Monsanto mRNA-stabilizing technology without permission. The cases will proceed. Link in comments below. ⬇️

This spine tingling moment just happened at the Sen. Johnson Hospital Protocols Hearing. I can understand exactly why the room erupted. Here’s an attorney with 50 years experience. At the start of covid, he gets flooded with requests to make Hospitals give early treatment protocols. But the result of his work is the part really blew my mind. 95.8% of the cases he won ,to force the Hospital to administer Ivermectin. Survived. But then I heard the contrast of what happened when he lost his cases... the patients who had to go with standard of care hospital protocols which included Remdesivir. Ralph Lorigo Esq. - “Where I lost.... Every. Single. Person. Died” I’m left speechless.

IMA Calls for Probe After CDC and FDA Relied on a Safety Alarm They Knew Was Broken Internal emails show FDA leaders were warned in early 2021 that the algorithm scanning COVID vaccine injury reports could not detect myocarditis and other harms from mRNA shots. Officials kept using it anyway and pointed to its silence as proof of safety. FULL STATEMENT: WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a national coalition of independent physicians, researchers and clinicians, today called on Congress and the Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) to investigate how the @CDCgov and @FDA handled COVID vaccine safety surveillance. The call follows an investigation published in The BMJ @bmj_latest (formerly British Medical Journal) by reporter David Willman. Willman reconstructed the first year of the mRNA rollout using internal government emails released under the Freedom of Information Act and to U.S. Senate investigators. The CDC promoted its Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as "the nation's frontline system" and "the early warning system for detecting possible vaccine safety problems." Behind the scenes, federal officials had been told that the method used to analyze those reports could not reliably detect harm from the two dominant mRNA products. They did not fix the method. They told the FDA scientist who offered a fix to stand down. Then they cited the absence of alerts as public reassurance. One reason given in writing for leaving the method alone: a change could have "unintended consequences" for "vaccine confidence." "Frontline doctors like me were seeing these injuries in growing numbers. When we raised the alarm, we were dismissed because the 'official data' said otherwise," said Dr. Joseph Varon (@joevaron), President and Chief Medical Officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. "Now we know that data came from a tool the FDA had been warned was blind. This is a failure of our public health system that may well rise to criminal negligence, and patients paid the price." What The BMJ found Two methods were supposed to run side by side: the CDC's proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and the FDA's empirical Bayesian data mining, with the agencies sharing results. In a little-noticed September 2022 letter, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said her agency did not run PRR analyses until 2022, more than a year into the vaccination campaign. Both agencies, she wrote, "chose to rely" on the FDA's Bayesian method, which she called "a more robust technique." In the weekly FDA reports The BMJ reviewed, that Bayesian method never signaled for myocarditis, pericarditis or tinnitus. The problem was a statistical effect called masking. In the first year, more than 90 percent of VAERS reports involved the two mRNA shots, so the algorithm was in effect comparing Pfizer against Moderna. If both raised the risk of the same injury, the elevated rate looked normal, and no alert fired. Timeline February 2021: FDA medical officer Dr. Ana Szarfman emailed Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and the government's top COVID vaccine regulator. She urged the agency to fix its monitoring and offered an updated algorithm developed by statistician William DuMouchel, who had designed the original Bayesian method the FDA was using. Late February 2021: The CDC and FDA received notice from Israel's Ministry of Health of a large number of myocarditis reports in young people after vaccination. Two weeks after Szarfman's email: Marks's office held a video conference with Szarfman. Her slides showed the PRR method lighting up with signals and the FDA's Bayesian method showing almost none: "You are not getting useful information with such low counts." DuMouchel's updated method, first published in 2012, caught signals without burying investigators in false alarms. Marks and his staff declined to change the FDA's approach. Spring 2021: Israeli officials told a CDC-convened safety committee that two of 77 vaccinated patients with myocarditis or pericarditis had died. The following week, the Pentagon's Defense Health Agency told the same committee about a cluster of myocarditis cases among male service members. April 27, 2021: Walensky told reporters, "We have not seen a signal [for myocarditis], and we've actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we've given." May 7, 2021: Craig Zinderman, an FDA medical policy official, asked Szarfman to "please hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses using COVID-19 vaccine AE [adverse event] data." Adjusting the method mid-campaign, he wrote, "could lead to confusion and have unintended consequences (eg, regarding vaccine confidence)." June 2021: A CDC presentation showed VAERS myocarditis and pericarditis reports in males ages 12 to 24 running 29 to 347 times higher than expected. The day before, Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, deputy director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, received the FDA's latest data-mining report, which still showed no alert. He emailed a colleague: "I'm perplexed that myocarditis isn't alerting for either of the mRNA vaccines." September 15, 2021: After Szarfman kept pressing, Marks wrote to his counterpart at the FDA's drug center that she had been asked to "cease and desist, because the strategy that she is using could create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric." 2022: When the CDC finally ran its PRR analyses, myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell's palsy and tinnitus met the agency's own signal criteria in all 13 consecutive weekly reports from May 6 to July 29. Hundreds of other event types also crossed the threshold. Walensky nonetheless wrote that the results were "generally consistent" with the Bayesian findings and revealed "no additional unexpected safety signals." The worksheets The BMJ examined do not support that description. October 2023: Dr. Narayan Nair, head of the FDA's vaccine pharmacovigilance division, wrote to CDC and FDA colleagues: "We were aware of this [data mining] limitation before and during the pandemic." "Officials protected the safety narrative instead of protecting patients," continued Varon. "They served the industry, not the individual. Groups like the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics joined the chorus to drown out frontline doctors. It is long past time for Congress and the Justice Department to find out how this happened and why. It must never happen again."

ask the brainwashing machine what to think... get a smoother brain!

How did I get alpha gal at 62 and haven't had ANY vaccines since I was a child. NO allergies or health issues until the damn tick. Chronic Lyme now and Alpha gal. It just sat there dormant all those years and other tick bites???

There is no off switch

I got my spike AB test from Labcorp just now. 9/22/2026 over 25,000 8/7/2026 14,831 day after 2L TPE 7/23/2026 over 25,000 4/21/2026 21,544 day home from Japan 1/15/2026 over 25,000 11/25/2025 over 25,000 When I come in under 25,000 I feel great. Near death otherwise.

RT @aravindmohanoor: I added a new feature to my v-safe viewer which will be helpful for everyone who does v-safe analysis (yes, all 6 of y…

Psyop is likely. Take a look at this analysis.

On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.) As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.) As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.) When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.) Now you know. This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.: cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/m…(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/m…(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/m…(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtm…(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks/inde…(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…). Complaint: icandecide.org/wp-content/up…

For 27 years, I practised medicine without a single complaint. I believe I was suspended because I prescribed ivermectin during the COVID 19 pandemic. On the same day, two complaints were made against me. One was from “John Smith” and the other was from Westmead Toxicology. Those complaints changed the course of my life and led to years of legal proceedings. I am now taking my fight to the Supreme Court because I believe the issues surrounding my case deserve to be properly examined. If you believe in fairness, due process and accountability, I would be deeply grateful for your support. Every donation, no matter how small, helps me continue this fight. Thank you to everyone who has stood by me. 👇 givesendgo.com/courageous-su…

You have a lot of nerve!!!!

🚨 THIS JUST TOOK A VERY SERIOUS TURN🫪 First, I asked for Moderna’s underlying residual-DNA testing/validation records. I was VERY specific. I was told Moderna’s confidential information couldn’t be released. So I changed the question. Fine. Don’t give me Moderna’s records. Give me FDA’s own records showing FDA reviewed, evaluated and validated Moderna’s testing…including whether the KanR test actually represented the TOTAL residual plasmid DNA left behind. If you have read Moderna’s Pre-Covid patents, been following Kevin McKernan and friends work, and Dr. Malones direct questioning at ACIP then you know why. FDA searched. Today they replied: “They found NONE responsive to that request.” In plain English: I asked for the receipts showing the regulators checked Moderna’s homework. FDA couldn’t find any receipts. And considering this testing was used to determine how much residual DNA remained in an injectable product given to millions of people? WHERE. IS. THE. VALIDATION⁉️ Show us who checked Moderna’s homework⚠️