This is only a couple hours old, so be patient as data accumulates. 😎 gigamegs.com/ Thanks to @CalvinAyre for the domain name idea. 🔥

BSV is up 45% since this video dropped. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

It begins...

I want to provide an update for the BSV community regarding the current US regulatory landscape and how it applies to BSV. The CLARITY Act failed to get a vote in the Senate. This happened in spite of a bill that had passed the House in a bipartisan manner, and after more than a year of debate in the Senate. However - this doesn't mean the conversation is over. It means the rulebook is now being written by the CFTC and the SEC, and both agencies have already made it clear they intend to move forward with or without Congress, and are expected to draw heavily on the CLARITY Act as a framework for their rulemaking. I want to share where BSV stands in all of this, because we've been in the room with both. At the CFTC, we covered the full picture, financial use cases included. But what they latched onto was the data utility side: blockchain as infrastructure for data at scale. And they were genuinely excited, because this was new messaging for them. Ninety-nine percent of the industry lobbying them isn't talking about that. That positioning is a winning one, and it's helping regulators and legislators understand there's far more to this technology than what they've been told. Why is this message so new to them? Because the industry has spent over a decade pushing bad narratives, and nearly all of them trace back to one assumption: that these systems don't scale. Every workaround, every "digital gold" story, every excuse for why blockchain can't do real work comes from that mistake. We walked in with a different message: Bitcoin always scaled. It was designed to from day one in 2009. BSV is just proving it to the world. At the SEC, we addressed one of the biggest misconceptions in the CLARITY Act: the idea that a blockchain's maturity can be measured by how decentralized its governance is. Decentralization was treated as a coefficient for maturity. That gets it backwards. There's a fundamental confusion here between decentralized governance and distributed systems. Bitcoin was never meant to be governed by committee. It's a distributed network with defined rules. What actually matters is a locked protocol. When the protocol is set in stone, anyone can build on top of it without worrying that the rules will change underneath them. That's what enables unbounded innovation. That's why the Association maintains the Network Access Rules and protects the original protocol. The result is maximum "decentralization" where it actually counts: in innovation and application building, not in protocol politics. We also reinforced something I've said many times: BSV is the restoration of the original Bitcoin protocol. We are rooted in Bitcoin's history. That matters more than ever. In March, the SEC and CFTC issued joint guidance recognizing BTC and BCH as digital commodities. Our meeting was an education, and they were highly receptive to it. They left understanding why BSV shares the very same fundamental principles the agencies are looking for in a digital commodity, because BSV is that protocol, restored. The rules are being written right now. We intend to make sure they're written with the original Bitcoin in mind: the scalable one, the regulation-friendly one.

Nasdaq alone processes spikes of 20,000 transactions per second, and the core infrastructure (orders, cancels, and updates) can spike to 1 million messages per second. All of the hard and long term work that has been done on BSV has been to prepare for this moment.

I Am Sick to Death of Hearing That Blockchain Cannot Scale singulargrit.substack.com/p/…

It’s the best thing for BSV that clarity does NOT see the light of day. That is unless you want BSV to be degraded to a common cryptocurrency instead of a public blockchain.

The CLARITY Act failed to clear its procedural hurdle in the US Senate. It’s a serious missed opportunity to bring order to the chaos that has long plagued this sector. It also doesn’t bode well for other pressing technology issues requiring bipartisan support, like regulating AI. CLARITY might get another shot in the next Congress, but even if it doesn’t, progress towards a proper blockchain regulatory solution in the US won’t stop. Both the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission are taking steps to modernize their respective rules re digital assets and have signaled their willingness to accelerate this process if CLARITY failed to advance. These regulatory revisions can be undone by future administrations far easier than legislation approved by Congress, but history shows it’s hard to make major reversals once the ‘boots on the ground’ reality has changed. And the times, they are-a-changin’. It’s my hope that regulation will help shift blockchain’s focus away from get-rich-quick schemes and the pursuit of outsized ‘yield’ generated by methods best left unsaid. It’s also my hope that BSV blockchain technology will be seen as a key beneficiary of this transition. From the start, BSV focused on working with regulators, not dodging them. BSV was also unlike most other blockchains due to its focus on utility, not speculation. And BSV always kept its eye on the horizon, building rails capable of handling transaction volume far beyond the pedestrian goals of the present. There isn’t a network out there that can compete with BSV in terms of bandwidth or transaction fees, and its stable protocol ensures that what developers build today will continue to function on the same foundation tomorrow. With regulators finally calling time on the Wild West era, it’s time for the good guys in the white Stetsons to saddle up and ride. Who here agrees that BSV’s time is now and what would you build to support that adoption? nitter.net/EleanorTerrett/status/…

If Satoshi Nakamoto is Not Dr. CSW. Why Satoshi used one of the Bitcoin address hidded in the Dr. Craig's books published before than Bitcoin's white paper in 2008.?, Find out by yourself to celebrate the failure of Clarity Act. Clue root.! [7][2][5].

This why the world needs genuine Bitcoin (BSV)!!! 💯

💎

I made 4chan on bsv. It's all on chain and you don't even need to connect a wallet to use it unless you want some vanity features. Even then you could have zero sats in your wallet Advertisement is its main source of revenue, and creating an ad is basically a click of a button. This ad system is a protocol that can be used on any app.

Self Proclaimed Satoshi Takes Aim At Bitcoin Governance Self proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright, has renewed his criticism of Bitcoin's governance model in a recent X post. He said Bitcoin's protocol should remain permanently fixed and argued developers, miners, and corporations should never rewrite the network's rules. According to Wright, innovation belongs at the application layer, not the base protocol. He said stable rules create a level playing field for businesses.

I don’t merely wish for BSV to win; I expect it to. BSV was not born from a desire to compete but from the conviction that it could redefine what is possible. It is my creation, not for the sake of victory, but for the sake of the idea it embodies - a means of truly distributed value exchange.

Think about the inversion for a moment. I am the one who has been villainised for defending the individual—for insisting that Bitcoin must have a fixed protocol so that no developer, corporation, exchange or foundation can seize control of it. I put tens of millions of my own family’s money into that fight. I threw everything at building the technology, restoring the protocol and releasing the tools. I dealt with compromised systems, intrusions, litigation and years of organised public hostility. Then look at what stood against me. COPA was backed by interests connected to Meta, Jack Dorsey, Coinbase and some of the largest corporate players in the world—organisations collectively representing trillions of dollars in capital and influence. Yet many of you convinced yourselves that they represented the small individual, while I represented centralised control. Think about that. I argued for rules that even I could not change. They defended a system directed by a small group of developers and supported by exchanges, custodians and corporate infrastructure. I argued that anyone should be able to build, compete and accept payment. They supported restrictions that pushed ordinary users back towards middlemen. You were told that concentrated corporate power was decentralisation, while the person demanding a protocol beyond anyone’s control was the villain. If you genuinely care about the small individual, stop repeating the branding and examine the structure of power.

BSV isn’t just a currency; it’s a statement. It’s a manifestation of an idea that defies the limitations imposed by centralised systems. I crafted it to stand as a testament to what can be achieved when innovation is driven by principle, not by the pursuit of fleeting recognition.

The western hemisphere used to be defined by a high-trust, cohesive worldview. This is been deeply broken. Over the next couple of months, we will be launching and relaunching apps that return us, verifiably, to being a high trust culture. Watch this space.

MOVIES ON BITCOIN

I would be for Bitcoin Monasteries killing AI. memory.money

Rule of thumb, when someone calls you a "cultist" for defending Satoshi's vision, like GarBabbage does, that person is an enemy of #Bitcoin. People who want to kill Satoshi's vision are enemies of #BSV. Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it: