Aerospace Journalist - Former Aircraft Mechanic & Aircraft Refueler - Answering Spaceflight Questions - Conspiracy Debunker
- Tweets 41,539
- Following 127
- Followers 1,244
- Likes 29,555
Pinned Tweet
Over the last few months I’ve made many photos challenging the many aspects of flat earthers, conspiracy theorists in general & their argument tactics.
This thread is a collection of the memes and photos I’ve made.
Download, save & share them 👍
39
15
74
20,229
The Biggest Mike retweeted
@4dots899721 invite your friends
@ your favorite flat earther or globehead and ask them why they aren’t joining this Friday.
Let’s hear their excuses for not joining.
x.com/i/spaces/1qxvveyOlWWxB
1
1
33
@ your favorite flat earther or globehead and ask them why they aren’t joining this Friday.
Let’s hear their excuses for not joining.
x.com/i/spaces/1qxvveyOlWWxB
67
When you think science denial has hit rock bottom, they take TNT to the bedrock and find a way to go deeper.
Though the reality is clear that Bo has no understanding of what velocity v acceleration is and is unable to clearly articulate what they are.
2
11
307
The Biggest Mike retweeted
@ethnicirishman will continue to run from this video you're posting because it ruins the lies he's trying to tell.
1
1
4
53
The Biggest Mike retweeted
If we 'lost the tech' to reach the Moon, then we also lost the tech to build the SR-71 Blackbird or Concorde. We didn't lose it we moved on to different priorities.
1
1
8
108
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Bonus: “NASA’s moonlanding technology: lost or not” by @anotherbigmike
youtu.be/Us3ZnKje6EQ?is=OQA3…
1
1
5
115
The Biggest Mike retweeted
If NASA faked the Moon landings why didn't the Soviet Union, their biggest Cold War rival, call them out on it?
They tracked the signal themselves. Space race physics doesn't care about X conspiracies.
This directly challenges their logic with one unavoidable historical fact.
1
1
8
104
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Are we really 'unable' to go back, or are we building something far more permanent this time?
Apollo was a short political sprint. Artemis is a sustainable marathon. Orion and SLS aren't just repeating history, they are building a lasting human presence on the Moon.
1
1
5
79
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Was it ever a technology problem, or was it simply about money and politics?
During Apollo, NASA got over 4% of the US budget. Post-1972? Less than 0.5%. How do you expect sustained moon missions when the budget gets slashed by 90%?
1
1
6
75
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Why not just rebuild the 1969 Saturn V rocket today?
Think about it: would you restart an entire factory line to build 1968 CRT televisions when 4K screens exist? Re-engineering modern spacecraft with modern safety standards isn't a copy-paste job.
1
1
6
90
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Myth: 'NASA destroyed the Saturn V blueprints!'
Really? Every schematic is archived on microfilm. But where are the 1960s factories, tools, and specialized workers today? You can't just order 60-year-old rocket parts on Amazon, can you?
2
1
7
113
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Did NASA really 'lose' the tech to go to the Moon? Of course not.
The tech wasn't lost, it was retired. Why would anyone rebuild 1960s analog hardware when you can engineer modern digital systems? Upgrading takes time, not magic. 🧵
4
3
27
367
Reminder that this coming Friday I will be running a space as I drove across the eastern half of America.
All are invited and no I won’t let the globers run amok.
3
7
214
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Your own sources shows shadows on the moon.
Which mean it is not light source:
Also, sun doesn't have moon face I have tested.
2
2
2
66
Here we go again.
“WTF is that in the sky?”
“They’re scraping the firmament!”
The ignorance is going to come back in droves.
Space jellyfish alert!
The Bandwagon-5 rocket launch from Florida on October 19, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT could produce a space jellyfish. This occurs when a rocket and its expanding exhaust plumes are illuminated by the sun and observers are in local darkness.
NOTE: This rare and unique trajectory is modeled as a best-guess estimate. This prediction may be inaccurate for distant viewers.
The rocket will enter sunlight 02m55s after launch.
Viewing locations, peak elevation while rocket is lit by the sun, and approximate viewing direction:
🟢 Nassau • 66° • NE
🟢 Jacksonville • 28° • SE
🟢 Havana • 25° • ENE
🟢 Charlotte • 14° • SSE
🟡 Virginia Beach • 13° • S
🟡 Kingston • 30° • NE
🟡 Nashville • 7° • SE
🔴 Panama City • 8° • NNE
🔴 Columbus, OH • 5° • SSE
🔴 Managua • 5° • NE
🔴 New Orleans • 9° • ESE
🔴 Mérida • 8° • ENE
🔴 New York • 6° • S
🔴 Providenciales • 77° • NE
See a detailed prediction for your location: jellyfish.johnkrausphotos.co…
Information as of 2026-10-17 20:04 UTC. Weather pending. Forecast does not model cloud cover or atmospheric conditions.
4
15
550
The Biggest Mike retweeted
Yup. So he admitted it, claimed it was a “joke post” and more other flat earthers are lying and pretending it came from NASA after one of their own admitted to faking it.
2
1
11
173
That was the inside of the payload fairing a second or two before jettison. It matches the shape and design of other customer adjusted fairings spacex has flown.
“That’s just what they wanted you to think!!”
You need to show work proving otherwise.
1
3
9
598
