$MU doesn’t immediately rip 20% on the open after earnings and the timeline instantly starts parroting the same old lazy take
"it’s cyclical, it’s going to dump, the move is over"
it honestly blows my mind how short people’s memories are on this app.
Remember when
$DELL went from $100 to $300 in 3 months, then jumped 30% on earnings to touch $400
at that exact moment, everyone called it a cyclical trap
that was about to dump
It didn’t dump at all
Instead, it ran straight from $400 to $595
and what happened
Once it was sitting at $595, the same people
who called it dead started talking about how incredible the fundamentals and forward guidance were, predicting another 50% run.
Remember
$AMD?
it pumped from $90 to $260 for a fresh ATH in about 200 days.
people immediately cried that it had moved way too far and the cycle was ending.
the stock chopped sideways for 150 straight days, bored everyone to tears and then ripped from $200 all the way to $580 in just 3 months.
same thing happened with
$NVDA when it ran from $400 to $1,400
everyone said it was wildly expensive and had nowhere left to go.
it split 10/1
consolidated in that painful $90 to $140 range for almost 10 months while impatient money washed out, and then casually doubled again from $100 to $233+
we saw the exact same script play out on
$INTC,
$GOOGL,
$PANW and
$MRVL.
and right now, I am looking at the exact same pattern setting up across
$MU,
$AMZN and
$ASML
these names are going to double from these consolidation shelves.
and the funniest part is, only after they double will consensus finally step in and say
"now it’s very clear, guidance is strong, it has another 50% upside from here"
at the end of the day, 95% of timeline commentary is just pure noise from people who don't know market history and have never held a winner through a multi month base.
block out the noise, do your own homework and trust your conviction.