Ugh.

Someone feed Pinker's article and Alexander's response into claude and ask it to evaluate both arguments, say who won, and then add its view.

Ask the AI safety AI who is right about AI safety. Ok!

Just sticking to novels. The first 8 I read from 12 years old to 22, and then Lonesome Dove I read at 40. Hard for books read later in life to compete with ones you read as a youth.

Graphic Novel version.

What opinion about reading will have you like this????

Luckily the one thing AI will never be good at is writing

It’s kind of unexpected how it quickly ramped up to “objectively pretty good but has this very annoying and distinctive voice” but then got stuck there.

I really need one for fiction and one for non-fiction

I know Ferris Bueller’s Day Off is considered a classic, but why? I still don’t get the appeal. He learns nothing.

Stuff I watched easily 10 times or more at different ages.

I actually have the opposite opinion because I feel like paying $160.00 a year to not have ads on a website that I mostly have playing while I do something else is an incredible waste of money It costs almost as much as a standard HBO max subscription for something where the actual content is free without me having to pay for it.

Have any of the mathematicians writing about AI considered the possibility that AI could show that math looks a lot uglier than we thought? Seems like an interesting idea to me

i guess the best option is to go back in time and get a government job which would at least last another decade or so until insolvency and revolution

I’m sorry to break it to you, but your teachers lied. There are stupid questions.

The scale of this is staggering. But... Why? Why is OpenAI trying to solve hundreds of math problems to be released all at once? I think we got the point when they found a counterexample to Navier-Stokes -- internal model = great. I am not sure at this point what this (hostile?) takeover of the mathematical landscape is trying to achieve other than, again, a massive PR stunt.