The single most useful take I heard at The Curve was "we can still heist the Mona Lisa after the singularity". There's a subtle/important point here, where some things (e.g, n of 1 goods where originally is valuable) will retain/grow in value even as everything changes.

Oct 5, 2026 · 3:48 PM UTC

81
36
730
124,692
This is also just a straight up great writing prompt - what would it mean to steal something in a post-singularity future? Who is the team? What are the security systems? How do the police work? great stuff! Session was chatham house so I can't name who said it.
6
4
147
15,256
To be agonizingly clear, the context of this quote was people talking about imagining things in the future, and noting that even though the singularity is confusing, it's possible to imagine things beyond it - like heists.
2
1
85
13,053
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @jackclarkSF
ocean's eleven is one agent and ten subagents now.
1
13
3,269
and now it's ocean's ONE MILLION
2
1
20
2,849
Replying to @jackclarkSF
I should've said hi
1
9
4,276
Please do next time!
9
3,357
@jackclarkSF The Mona Lisa line has a bigger upside than it sounds. If n-of-1 goods gain value while everything else gets cheap, abundance turns provenance into the scarce asset. Bet: by 2030 one of the fastest-growing job categories is certifying what's original, and AI makes those people better at it, not obsolete.
10
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Post-singularity, money stops being for survival and becomes for scarcity. Anyone can have a perfect copy of the Mona Lisa. Only money buys the original. And if money is just for collecting playthings, how many will be desperate enough to steal one? The heist becomes less likely.
20
Replying to @jackclarkSF
I’ll take it a step further and say it’s my intention to have trained my model well enough that it knows my process and I want it to create works of art in the same manner as my human/ai collab makes today, after I die
15
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Jack, perhaps the subtler post-singularity heist leaves the painting on the wall. The Mona Lisa points toward something that also exists at everyday scale: a child’s drawing, a wedding ring, a friendship. Their significance includes a particular history and relationship. That suggests a further step: some goods acquire their value through our participation. Having a machine play beautifully doesn’t give us the experience of learning to play. So imagining life after the singularity also means imagining people continuing to create histories worth having - even when superior outputs are readily available. Your writing on superpersuasion adds a more intimate question: when AI helps us discover what to love, pursue and treasure, how do we keep that discovery meaningfully our own? We explore this in "Homo Sapiens Dirigens et Significans" bit.ly/dirigens-et-significa… , drawing in part on your writing.
26
Replying to @jackclarkSF
The singularity still can't give all of us the penthouse view.
98
Replying to @jackclarkSF
every time a model paints a better one, the Louvre line gets longer
180
Replying to @jackclarkSF
A perfect copy can reproduce the paint, but it can't have been in Leonardo's workshop. The history of the object is part of what people want.
1
308
Replying to @jackclarkSF
honestly the singularity solves everything except the guard who still falls asleep at 3am
373
Replying to @jackclarkSF
the year is 20xx, 99% of GDP is openai and anthropic heisting the Mona Lisa from one another
18
12
570
21,481
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Unique originals keep their premium when copies become free.
134
Replying to @jackclarkSF
That's pretty telling if that was the most useful takeaway there. You people just need to stop. Stop endangering everyone else in pursuit of some "utopia" that nobody asked for and seems very unlikely to manifest.
5
371
Replying to @jackclarkSF @tszzl
All hand made goods will be valuable. Anything of significant value today becomes priceless
1
480
Replying to @jackclarkSF
The future might be strange: infinite copies become cheap, but the original becomes priceless.
1
114
Replying to @jackclarkSF @tszzl
how about society’s shared values?
1
428
Replying to @jackclarkSF
post-singularity economy: infinite abundance, exactly one Mona Lisa, and a heist crew of fine-tuned agents. scarcity always finds a way lol
28
Replying to @jackclarkSF
So these sociopaths *do* know the value of art. Huh.
19
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Strikingly unuseful for the most useful thing you heard at such an esteemed venue
62
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Unfortunately I am not a veblen good
1
75
Replying to @jackclarkSF
That's obvious if you spend any time on twitter--there's no stealing this network of amazing people
1
266
Replying to @jackclarkSF
How is this useful?
4
41
1,055
Replying to @jackclarkSF
i've been telling anybody who will listen for months now that there will still be an economy after ai bc people will still want scarce birkins and aps
1
26
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Ship of theseus seems relevant here
146
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Heist it, yes… But for what purpose, other than personal enjoyment? Who would pay in what kind of currency for it?… What will be the exchange coin in that future?… Follow-up questions for the writing prompt 😊
1
2
1,048
Replying to @jackclarkSF
especially if we tokenize it on the blockchain, just like da vinci would have wanted
17
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Money can work the same way if its supply truly can't be stretched, which is a big part of why I hold ZEC, scarce on purpose and private when I want it.
3
304
Replying to @jackclarkSF
One of the really weird things that is difficult to imagine is how people will practically trade the goods and services that remain scarce after the singularity. Will people barter? Will there still be fiat currencies, or have they collapsed in a post-labor economy? Maybe there is a return to the gold standard, or perhaps we will see the rise of a compute-backed currency?
2
262
Replying to @jackclarkSF
The Mona Lisa is worth stealing because there's exactly one, and no model can run off a second copy of what the guards are protecting. Scarcity is the one thing intelligence can't print.
130
Replying to @jackclarkSF
same reason people still pay for a signed copy over a free pdf
1
74
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Scarcity will still exist in time, place and originality.
17
Replying to @jackclarkSF
Not if the agent guarding the Mona Lisa installs a security system the physics of which no human can understand...
71