⬡ data spinner ⬡ silo disrepectoor ⬡ stakeholder in the backbone of the Global Financial System ⬡ p̵l̵a̵t̵f̵o̵r̵m̵ Protocol Economy explainoor ⬡

If you really want to understand what Swift's blockchain work is all about - this two part conversation with Claude will answer everything. If you hold gas or interop tokens like btc eth sol xrp xlm zro qnt iota algo icp hbar - you need to understand this
4
14
91
52,643
this is the beauty of Chainlink's role. it doesnt matter what the blockchain is. it doesnt matter what the offchain database is. it doesnt matter what the LLM is. it doesnt matter what jurisdiction it is. it doesnt matter what value is used. the data matters a fck ton. in the real world - the data comes BEFORE the settlement. The real world runs thru Swift. And Swift's interoperability with blockchain runs thru Chainlink. ACE in the hole. Payable in $LINK
how many crypto bros do you think could actually explain cross-border, multi-chain, multi-currency, multi-party settlement of tokenized securities?
1
2
138
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Replying to @platos_son
It is different...
"Every project's North Star is get real-world, non-retail dependent volume" Storm comin'
1
2
178
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Replying to @cryptomanran
Most people are still sleeping on $LINK
"Theres really not a better conduit than DTCC & Euroclear. Jorgen mentioned $43T in aseets - we represent $100T. We are at the center. By using partners like Chainlink, we’re able to move… very quickly & completely update financial markets.” $LINK
1
1
9
465
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Replying to @cryptomanran
Pretty soon DTCC will start clearing transactions on Canton - the first of many optional blockchains to come. Pretty soon DTCC will be tokenizing & automating the collateral that secures the $4.7Q DTCC processes annually - on their Besu AppChain. Powered by $LINK
I had a question if DTCC going live would mean we will see an increase in CCIP volume. To my understanding CCIP's role is still limited at this point. "What flows through Chainlink specifically: Every eligibility check, every valuation call, every margin calc, every settlement instruction — all routed through CRE. 𝗔𝘁 𝗗𝗧𝗖𝗖 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗲 this isn't a few hundred million in TVS, 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼𝘂𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸'𝘀 𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘆 in steady state." Its the data and computation provided by the Chainlink Runtime Environment that sees the majority usage in the system. They think $LINK is a bridge, thats its a price feed. They never heard of Consensus Computing.
3
3
20
754
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Yoo uhm… @Morpho are you saying your business model doesn’t work?
22
9
175
41,907
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
You can now use seven Coinbase tokenized stocks as collateral for loans on AAVE, thanks to Chainlink price feeds 🙏 $LINK $COIN $AAVE
BREAKING: Chainlink Price Feeds are powering the pricing for seven Coinbase tokenized stocks now accepted as collateral on Aave V4 on Base.
1
7
46
1,475
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
When the banks like Citi are making statements like " $LINK may eclipse bitcoin" and its the "interoperability standard for the tokenized Global Financial System - the same banks that will be using $LINK - you have to wonder - what do they know?
imagine the board of directors and the 11,500 members of the Swift co-op handing over their future to "crypto currencies" and DeFI degens - leaving them to figure out how to kludge together a bunch of disparate VC projects with individual trust assumptions, governance and competing interests. have you met banks? They dont trust. And they dont leak value. Product Market Fit $LINK everything
1
6
26
626
imagine the board of directors and the 11,500 members of the Swift co-op handing over their future to "crypto currencies" and DeFI degens - leaving them to figure out how to kludge together a bunch of disparate VC projects with individual trust assumptions, governance and competing interests. have you met banks? They dont trust. And they dont leak value. Product Market Fit $LINK everything
CITI made that statement back in 2021. They followed it up in June calling Chainlink the interoperability standard for the tokenized Global Financial System. Along with @StanChart calling $LINK "the only end-to-end platform capable of supporting the full lifecycle of tokenised assets across both DeFI and TradFI" in August. One statement is noise. Multiple is signal.
1
3
17
1,344
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Quadrillions. That’s right.
QUADRILlIONS
3
32
179
5,759
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
"I better really do that" S.N, 2025
7
29
162
12,151
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
CITI made that statement back in 2021. They followed it up in June calling Chainlink the interoperability standard for the tokenized Global Financial System. Along with @StanChart calling $LINK "the only end-to-end platform capable of supporting the full lifecycle of tokenised assets across both DeFI and TradFI" in August. One statement is noise. Multiple is signal.
JUST IN: @Citi's new Tokenization 2030 report highlights Chainlink CCIP as the interoperability standard connecting the tokenized global financial system. Citi projects tokenized asset markets can reach $8.2 trillion by 2030, with secure cross-chain connectivity being critical.
1
4
28
2,047
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
“if you get hacked, you get sued into oblivion and lose years to court battles” avoid the hacks avoid the lawsuits just use Chainlink 👍 $LINK
at this point, founding a defi project feels like the Game of Thrones if you are at the top, you make hundreds of millions if you are not, your business suffocates and dies if you get hacked, you get sued into oblivion and lose years to court battles
1
2
26
1,514
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Whhheeeww. Huge. This is exactly what you want to see for $LINK tokenomics to evolve into the monster we know it can be.
🚨NEW: SEC staff has issued new FAQs clarifying how the Commission’s March interpretive release on digital assets applies to token functionality, staking receipt tokens and investment contracts. Among the guidance: once a network is functional, services to maintain, improve or grow it generally would not count as “essential managerial efforts” under the Howey test. The FAQs reflect staff views and have no legal force or effect.
1
13
75
3,331
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
Some bangers from the SEC today: 1) buybacks do not make a commodity token into a security 2) liquid staking tokens for commodities are not securities sec.gov/about/divisions-offi…
56
249
1,816
179,659
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
At the Federal Reserve Fintech Conference, Chainlink's Sergey Nazarov joined leaders from BlackRock, Vanguard, and Sharplink to discuss the future of blockchain in traditional finance and the infrastructure bringing institutional assets onchain at scale. chainlinktoday.com/nazarov-t…
8
27
3,381
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
"Im as libertarian as any of you." "We want a more privacy preserving financial system." Abstraction. Orchestration. Privacy. Cryptographic truth. The virus is spreading. $LINK SmartCon Wellington @rorypiant @SergeyNazarov #RainyDaysAndMondaysAlwaysGetMeDown
If im your counterparty - Prove everything If im not your counterparty - its none of your fkcing business Abstraction. Orchestration. Privacy. "Its just data" nah bitch "its $LINK"
4
6
53
5,363
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
MORE: The SEC uses the classic Howey test to determine when crypto assets and token sales constitute securities under federal law, focusing on economic reality rather than terminology. Assets fall under securities regulation if investors reasonably expect profits driven by the managerial efforts of founders or central entities. Issuers offering crypto asset securities must provide tailored disclosures beyond traditional models. This new guidance mandates clear reporting on token mechanics, network governance, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, concentration of token ownership, valuation methods, and promoter involvement. Absolutely massive for transparency and legitimization of this industry. This new guidance also distinguishes basic network validation from pooled staking services, liquid staking tokens, or yield-bearing stablecoins, which carry a heightened risk of being classified as investment contracts. Additionally, traditional assets tokenized on a blockchain remain fully subject to standard securities registration and compliance rules. A security onchain is still a security, big surprise there… I digress. This is absolutely massive for clarification of the rules, and the SEC is coming in big time post-CLARITY failure. Absolutely love to see it.
NEW: SEC staff clarifies when live tokens, buybacks, and staking receipts are not securities. Absolutely huge for onchain finance.
9
15
133
33,972

ALT Jurassic Park Ian Malcom GIF

NEW: SEC staff clarifies when live tokens, buybacks, and staking receipts are not securities. Absolutely huge for onchain finance.
2
2
29
982
run ⬡ the ⬡ juels retweeted
$LINK Staking v1.0 incoming?👀
NEW: SEC staff clarifies when live tokens, buybacks, and staking receipts are not securities. Absolutely huge for onchain finance.
8
14
187
7,606