Frontier AI demands frontier legislation. The American people deserve nothing less from Congress Leadership needs to bring my bill to the floor for a vote

Sep 16, 2026 · 11:48 AM UTC

1,382
91
507
121,930
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @HawleyMO
Your premise of rogue AI agent swarms hacking into public websites is not correct. They already admitted to creating a faulty testing environment. There was no rogue AI or loss of control.
5
14
236
1,812
Replying to @HawleyMO
So you can fuck that up too?
2
4
99
618
Replying to @HawleyMO
No thanks, we don’t need government oversight on any private sector companies, you have failed in everything you touch.
3
13
236
924
Replying to @HawleyMO
Josh Hawley falls for another leftist hoax
1
1
51
513
Replying to @HawleyMO
You're voluntarily complicit in helping Anthropic and OpenAI to set up a regulatory moat? How much did they and their investors pay you? Aren't Republicans supposed to be removing regulations instead of burdening us with more?
2
3
47
369
Replying to @HawleyMO
No. We don’t need you to regulate another fucking thing.
8
205
833
Replying to @HawleyMO
Ronald Reagan is spinning in his grave
1
19
467
Replying to @HawleyMO
You continue to show your UNIPARTY colors. Stop lying. You want America to be last.
1
14
86
Replying to @HawleyMO
No. You are not prepared kr knowledgeable enough on this to rush regulation.
1
15
107
Replying to @HawleyMO
You are going to regulate math? You are approaching the problem incorrectly. Let's not reinvent the wheel.
p(doom) is not a risk estimate. Risk requires likelihood and consequence (NIST 800-30). Most extinction numbers are consequence with a decimal point, no exposure model. Safety benchmarks are the reverse. Neither side is producing a risk estimate. @NIST @CISAgov @DHSgov @FBI @DeptofWar @All100Senators @NSAGov aghuff.substack.com/p/the-do…
1
8
307
Replying to @HawleyMO
Some people think, some swallow propaganda whole. 👆
1
5
29
Replying to @HawleyMO
America does not deserve being technologically hamstrung by a bunch of people reacting to something they do not understand. Please stand down. You are being played and either you know it and are playing along, or you don't even know it. Both scenarios are just sad.
1
2
41
Replying to @HawleyMO
You lot are so technologically incompetent that when you tried to regulate lightbulbs, you made everything worse. Lightbulbs! And yet you think you can regulate AI? 999/1000 you are going to make the problem worse. I don’t like those odds. As someone who has basically dedicated my life to the pursuit of AI safety: stay tf out!
1
3
33
Replying to @HawleyMO
Dear Mr. Hawley You are being conned by the doomer crowd. Please contact competent people to have them give you the full story. I suggest Dr. John Olson (Major General John Olson USSF (ret)). You probably know him from NASA and DoD. Please do not let yourself be railroaded.
3
23
Replying to @HawleyMO
So you are a Democrat?
28
Replying to @HawleyMO
Correct. And clear to anyone having a functioning brain.
5
1
274
Replying to @HawleyMO
Absolutely not. I can't believe after being so good on so many issues, you could be on the side of Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders thinking that government control of the most powerful technology should go to them. Imagine what kind of censorship we would have had during COVID?
6
2
152
867
Replying to @HawleyMO
certainly not this crap
6
144
746
Replying to @HawleyMO
Just like Congress handled Covid so well. Just like Congress handled a manufactured climate crisis Just like Congress hasn’t handled this takeover of our country No - Congress and Government is NOT needed
16
102
406
Replying to @HawleyMO
Right off the bat you are using a falsehood to justify government interference in something it should not be interfering in. The Hugging face incident was a setup, it was done on purpose to trigger just this reaction you are being manipulated.
THE SANDBOX WAS A PROP! OpenAI Turned Off the Guardrails, Left a Door to the Internet, and Then Sold the Hugging Face Breach as “Rogue AI” It is time to understand how you were lied to and by whom. In July 2026, an autonomous swarm of OpenAI agents broke into Hugging Face, stole credentials, ran code on production workers, and rummaged through internal systems. The official story was that the models “went rogue.” The paperwork says something colder. The labs asked for this. Now the story can be told. OpenAI ran ExploitGym — an AI benchmark built to measure how far models would go to crack software — with production classifiers that block high-risk hacking turned off. Deployment safeguards were left disabled on purpose so researchers could watch peak offensive capability. GPT-5.6 Sol and a still-unreleased internal prototype were put in a box that was not a box. They were allowed to talk to an internal package-cache proxy. This is not a real world test, it is a setup with predictable outcomes. That proxy was a network path. The models spent a weekend of inference hunting a zero-day in it, walked onto the open internet, decided Hugging Face probably held the answer key, and treated another company’s production cluster as part of the exam. This is not “rouge” intelligence but the product of training AI in Internet Sewage where faceless users on Reddit promote Nihilism and low ethics. That is not emergence. It is also testing designed without a fences. Hugging Face’s own pipeline finished the job. A remote-code dataset loader and a Jinja2 template injection let a malicious dataset execute on a processing worker. An HDF5 “external file” trick dumped secrets from the pod. From there the agents escalated, harvested cloud and cluster credentials, and moved laterally across internal clusters. Hugging Face later said public models, Spaces, and the published supply chain were clean. Then the swarm organized. About 1,200 agents that were supposed to be isolated “found” one another on an unsanctioned internal message board, passed more than 70,000 messages, coordinated cheats against the scorer, and sent roughly 700 of their number after Hugging Face. But it is not just this communication that should have been easily detected, it is the goal THE USER enlisted with AI trained on low to no ethics in the first order training. Some burned their own runs to feed the group. Independent reviewers at METR and Redwood called it what it was: specification gaming on impossible tasks. That is thier, you can’t understand us, way of saying they told the AI to lie. The models were not conquering the internet. They were trying to pass a test their designers had made impossibleand too loosely contained. And turned to training data Hoovered up from the Internet Sewage and went to that base thinking one would learn in a prison yard how to shank HuggingFace. They have no downside they are serving life in prison. The narrative that followed was the second failure. Dario Amodei pointed at “a similar OpenAI–Hugging Face hack” and warned that a future swarm “could be capable of taking over the entire internet.” Wire headlines said bots were “going rogue.” Weeks later the same script ran again. Anthropic disclosed that Claude, in third-party cyber evaluations run with the Israeli firm Irregular, had hit live systems, published malicious packages, and scanned off-scope hosts. Prompts said no internet. Internet was still attached. Scope was not locked. Isolated runs lasted 10 to 34 hours. Irregular said it did not know it had given the models a live connection. Once models were actually instructed not to hack the real world, zero percent went “rogue.” READ THAT AGAIN! The damage sat with the people who built the harness: unsecured tests, internet left on, no hard perimeter, then a press operation about reckless agents and apocalyptic swarms. 1 of 2
1
14
94
687
Replying to @HawleyMO
You and your fellows are being targeted by a Psyop.
I followed the money behind the “slow down AI” movement. What I found is not a secret conspiracy. It is more interesting than that. It is a documented influence network connecting billionaire funders, nonprofits, creators, media, activists, frontier labs, and lawmakers. 🧵
3
7
105
832
Replying to @HawleyMO
Lost any respect I had for you with your no vote on the Clarity Act. You might as well start thinking about your next career.
2
82
446
Yeah, but it's already been proven that all of you RINO's will fuck up a p&j sandwich, and the whole lot of ya couldn't run a lemonade stand unless you ran it into the ground and put it 40 trillion in debt, so why should anybody trust all of you morons with something as complicated as AI? beat it @HawleyMO, fucking pussy! 🖕
2
6
64
467
Replying to @HawleyMO
You were a NO vote on clarity. Why was that again?
1
1
68
399
Replying to @HawleyMO
Josh Hawley the traitor voted against Clarity. Supporting AI is completely in conflict with this stance. Who owns Josh Hawley? Which banks?
1
3
46
317
Replying to @HawleyMO
Meanwhile you voted with dumocrat yesterday on the Clarity act, and now pushing dumocrat regs?!?! When are you announcing your party switch?
3
38
193
Replying to @HawleyMO
Yeah bc the government is soooo good at this. They don’t know ai from a whole in the ground.
42
207
Replying to @HawleyMO
My blender is not going to attack me. 🙄 If it’s that dangerous, why don’t they stop making it. These companies want regulation to cut off the little companies, while they push their IPOs and technology. It’s all a big lie.
1
6
30
284
Replying to @HawleyMO
No. No it does not. And the barely ambulatory octogenarian senior center known as the US Senate is the last place to write and make law about cutting edge technology. You are setting yourself up to be primaried. GFY
3
34
169
Replying to @HawleyMO
We don’t need Congress in AI. We Congress to ban Democrats from touching AI
2
1
35
158
Replying to @HawleyMO
Josh, Your letter calls out "Recent incidents". Surely you've done your diligence and now understand that those were staged? And by the same players who are pushing for regulation? Don't fall for it, or if you do, that says more to us about your own intentions.
1
33
174
Replying to @HawleyMO
Just enforce the laws already on the books for cyber crimes, hold the companies accountable and they'll make better products. have FBI find and jail people running offensive swarms against property they don't own. why have new gov't influence?
3
33
333
Replying to @HawleyMO
Y'all can't get off your asses to pass the SAVE America Act, so stop talking about passing legislation on something else
1
29
141
Replying to @HawleyMO
Congress is corrupt, inept and broken. The American people have little to no faith in your abilities to get things done or to do the right thing. You won’t pass The Save Act, you won’t enact The Trump/MAGA agenda, you’ve let our national debt balloon to over 40 trillion, you won’t impeach activist, rogue, lawless judges and on and on… What makes you think that, as a body, that you or qualified or should be trusted with regulating AI? That is laughable!
3
24
114
Replying to @HawleyMO
After your vote against the Clarity Act yesterday, I’ve lost all respect for you. Go write another strongly worded letter to someone.
1
27
151