In summer 2021, David Malone & I made a 50 min UK C4 film investigating #originofcovid Interviewees incl @R_H_Ebright Profs Relman, Bell & Petrovsky, @Ayjchan various #DRASTIC researchers, @JamieMetzl @FilippaLentzos Here are 7 clips:

Andy Burnham and Labour’s Downing Street team have made it clear they don’t want any criminal investigation into the Premier League’s findings of fake arrangements between Manchester City and its sponsors. So this type of tax evasion will become even more common than it is now.

"Women are 51% of the population. We are not a fringe group." @miriam_cates rather magnificently uses facts to destroy nonsense. IIRC "nutter" is one of the words the Greens seek to ban.

Perhaps Polanski constructs his own identity. His own history. His own truth. And expects everyone to respect it as factually correct. A familiar pattern.

“Thank you, Prime Minister.” The message from prisoners released under Labour’s early-release scheme. Criminals are celebrating. The public is carrying the risk of Labour’s prisons crisis.

An important thread analysing one of the flagship projects of "Manchesterism". Is Burnham's Official Narrative of Mayoral economic development about to crash and burn?

How pathetic that we live in an age where permission has to be granted to call a male rapist a man🤦🏼‍♀️ Male criminals should never be called she/her/woman in any context; court rooms, media, judicial process nor stats etc. ‘THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH & NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH’ (er, except, we’ll be part of a massive lie & it’s fine🤯). These are NOT our crimes. Btw, being raped must be utterly, utterly devastating. Imagine what it must do to the victim, to hear her perpetrator called a ‘woman’ and ‘she’ 🤦🏼‍♀️🤡🌍

All this nonsense about Burnham being a great communicator. Yes, he can stand on a stage in front of his tribe who've been given guidance when to clap & how to praise him, and make entirely unfunded promises. But on issues which are difficult, he's reduced to mumbling word salad.

Hahahaha.

A black Labrador and a country pub are branded "Far Right", with a Labour Minister declaring "we don't want to have" such a vision. Surreally, one has to wonder whether this is part of the government's "Hope" agenda for a fairer, more cohesive, Britain... x.com/TheMercianNews/status/…

It really is shocking to imagine that, while we American's were going about our day and enjoying our family and friends in March, 2016, our government was: - making Ebola, a 50% lethal virus, massively more transmissible - testing a late stage Ebola vaccine in non-human primates that had ZERO efficacy. - being upset this data was shared with countries in Africa where the vaccine was going to be tested because it would make clinical trial recruitment more difficult. (as a drug developer, I suggest it was late-stage testing because of the study in NHP, which you do not do in early stage work). Thank you @SenRandPaul for shining the light on this evil.

Here's what people are missing about the new NIH documents @RandPaul released: When you read all the emails, it's clear that NIH has classified biodefense research programs. Fauci felt very comfortable saying that results from an NIH-funded Ebola experiment should be classified. He would only talk that way if there were other research programs he was running that were already classified. Fauci was likely running way more "biodefense" studies than we were ever told, because some of them remain classified. Here's the text of his 2016 email: The DoD folks said that they wanted to publish the data. I said that I thought that it should be classified and the NSC people blew them out of the water and said that they agreed with me.

In early 2020, publications in prestigious medical journals deliberately branded the Covid lab leak hypothesis as a "conspiracy theory". This "framing of the narrative" suppressed journalistic investigation. We exposed this in our Aug 2021 film.

This will be sinister beyond your imagination. A government “Information” agency correcting “untrue narratives about Britain”. Their solution is never to address the reasons people are angry (migration, crime, taxes). It is always to correct the supposed false consciousness of the proletariat.

The Wuhan Mystery (English edition) – Serialized, Open access – coming soon! 📖🔥 I have a rep for being quite stubborn, and this is no exception: My critics increasingly try to portray me as someone only looking to make money off my book on Covid origins. That couldn’t be further from the truth. I am deeply and solely invested in this to find true answers to one of the most important questions of our time, and to prove it, I will be publishing (with my publisher’s approval) the English Edition of the Norwegian bestselling non-fiction / true crime hybrid 'The Wuhan Mystery' completely open access on Substack. It will be serialized for that extra suspense, a new installment dropping every week until Christmas - starting next week on tuesday 29th sept. By subscribing (at no cost whatsoever) you get installments directly in your inbox the moment they go live, and you also get access to a downloadable PDF at the end of the serial. Appreciate all help to spread the word! 🙏 Here's the full story behind why I'm doing it this way, and how to read along 👇 sigridbratlie.substack.com/p…

The increase in budgets for--and increase in numbers of sociopaths engaged in--bioweapons-agents research following the 2001 anthrax attacks directly resulted in the reckless gain-of-function research on SARS viruses that caused COVID, killing 20 million and costing $25 trillion.

Imagine you’re Putin looking at this shite

🚨 The Government has revealed that it consulted the left-wing, censorious think tank the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) over the Online Safety Act. The CCDH was founded by Morgan McSweeney, Keir Starmer’s former Downing Street Chief of Staff. It claims that it wants to tackle “hate”, but in practice campaigns for greater restrictions on online speech. Its US Director, Imran Ahmed, is a staunch opponent of the Trump administration, and it has been reported that the US State Department is even considering deporting him. In response to a parliamentary question from Shadow Cabinet Office Minister Mike Wood, ministers revealed: “DCMS also engages with a range of civil society organisations in developing online harms policy, including where it relates to public safety. As part of this, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate has participated in official-level roundtables with the department in 2024 and 2026.” The CCDH has received money from taxpayer-funded charities, was revealed to have drawn up a plan to “Kill Musk’s Twitter”, and campaigns for greater government control of the internet, as well as the defunding of right-of-centre platforms. So why is the Government consulting an organisation with such an overtly censorious agenda on laws governing what millions of people can say and see online? Read more in @GuidoFawkes 👇

🚨👀 NEW FSU BRIEFING: Misinformation about Misinformation The British Government is preparing an apparatus of internet censorship without precedent in the modern era. The Orwellian DCMS Green Paper proposes forcing social media algorithms to favour "trustworthy" state-approved sources. Labour's Lucy Powell wants platforms under broadcast-style duties of "accuracy and balance" during elections. The Government Office for Science wants a state-linked database of "false and misleading narratives" and official "prebunking" in schools. None of this fell from the sky. It is the demand of a lobby, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, co-founded by Sir Keir Starmer's former Chief of Staff, Morgan McSweeney, and the Foreign Office-funded Global Disinformation Index, whose members then sat as "expert" reviewers marking their own homework on the evidence for the policy they demanded. That review cost taxpayers almost half a million pounds. It relied on AI-generated summaries of two hundred and twenty-eight papers nobody read, contained no climate scientist, economist, clinician, or epidemiologist, and grounded its central claim, that algorithms are "exclusively profit- and engagement-driven", on a single AI-synthesised paper from an institution ranked ten thousand three hundred and seventieth in the world. The real evidence contradicts the panic. A Science study found flagged vaccine misinformation on Facebook drew just 0.3% of 2.7 billion views, while unflagged, accurate content had forty-six times the impact on hesitancy. A Nature synthesis put "fake news" at roughly 0.15% of the average American's media diet. Twitter's own researchers found no evidence of algorithmic bias toward extremes. Only 33% of adults think the BBC, the state's model of trustworthiness, is impartial. Under this regime, questioning heat pump efficiency or electric vehicle range counts as "misinformation." Whoever controls the label controls the debate. Britain has not seen anything like this since the Star Chamber licensing decrees of 1637 under King Charles I. Milton's answer still stands: let truth and falsehood grapple, for truth's confuting is the best and surest suppressing. Read the new report from FSU Director of Policy and Research @DavidRoseUK 👇

The Nottingham Post exemplified the finest traditions of journalism and the Fourth Estate. They spoke, and continue to speak, Truth to Power. An outstanding article from Emma Webber.