50+ year old Ph.D. student. @FUDdaily nitter.net/i/grok/share/4c76b7b14…

Political activism disguised as neutral research. That paper is not more than an opinion piece.

Labour MPs sit as officers of Stand Up To Racism. That is not a rumour. Diane Abbott is president. Bell Ribeiro-Addy is co-chair. Richard Burgon is a vice chair. Kim Johnson sits on the executive. SUTR still tells the public it is “independent” and unaffiliated to any party. Those two facts do not sit together once SUTR starts treating another party’s canvassing as something to be driven off the street. Restore Britain is a registered party. You can disagree with its programme and still notice the problem. In Holborn and St Pancras, SUTR published an investigation into Restore’s nominators and campaigners, then local activists surrounded a leafleting team, chanted them down the high street and, according to police, one protester punched a Restore campaigner and was arrested. That is not an argument. It is an attempt to stop campaigning. If Restore has former BNP figures, Homeland activists or people making antisemitic claims in its campaign, say so. Print it. Quote the nomination papers. Put it on a leaflet. That is politics. Surrounding canvassers and calling the area an “anti-fascist zone” is something else: a claim that some parties do not get to knock on doors. So the question for Labour is simple. Are these MPs involved in SUTR as private citizens with a hobby, or are they lending parliamentary authority to a group that physically disrupts a rival? You cannot hold formal office in the group, pose with it, speak for it, and then shrug when it chases another party’s campaigners away. Either SUTR is a broad civic campaign, in which case it should not be shutting down legal election activity, or it is a militant operation that decides which parties may appear in public. It cannot be both. Labour can oppose Restore at the ballot box. It already has a candidate in that seat. What it should not do is let its own MPs front a vehicle that replaces persuasion with obstruction. If a Conservative-linked group did this to Labour canvassers, the same MPs would call it an attack on democracy. The principle does not change because the target is Restore. Question the ideas. Expose the associations. Win the argument. Do not pretend that “anti-racism” is a permission slip for sitting MPs to help stop another party campaigning.

"Final year." That's the giveaway.

Legal anonymity? Thats appalling. Our government and judiciary are traitors.

Somebody at the Home Office needs to go to jail. This isn't just a bureaucratic lapse. This is reckless endangerment of the British people - and we should by all rights be ready to mutiny over this.

Would this be classed as inciting violence?

Stand Up To Racism’s organised crowding and aggressive confrontation of Restore Britain canvassers in Holborn today is capable of amounting to public order offences under sections 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, and common assault where there is unwanted physical contact. Police arrested one woman last week for punching a campaigner. Why are they not consistently enforcing the same offences against this repeated interference with lawful by-election campaigning?

The reason these left wing scumbags behave this way is because they know they enjoy what amounts to criminal immunity. They can pretty much do as they please and some nonce of a judge will let them walk. That's why this will all end with violence.

I created a poster letting people know that our Dutch Barn cocktails are in all the railway branches of WH Smith. Unfortunately WH Smith wanted nothing to do with it. Back to the drawing board 😂

Hope you swore whilst in there.

This is what our team is facing as they try to campaign for Restore Britain in Holborn and St Pancras today. It is disgraceful.

She looks like a ghoul.

Unpaid leave, for any loss of pregnancy before 24 weeks.

Mohammed did beat his wives. Aisha was his favourite, and she recounted a time when he beat her for disobeying him.

Ikram is not corrupt. He is a Muslim, so follows their rules. He demonstrates why Muslims should not be judges, MPs or in other positions of power.

And this children, is why Israel has targeted certain "civilian" infrastructure. Gaza used to have one of the highest concentrations of hospitals in the world, but still sent its people to Isreal to be treated. I het you can't guess why.

So let me get this right. Pedophile gets bail, not only get’s bail but is allowed to return home to the very same place he was filming young girls out of the window from. Even the head of the Met Police asked “why are we protecting pedophiles and not children” Danny Tommo; punctures a boat and he’s refused bail. I post an intemperate tweet, swiftly deleted, refused bail. None of this is coincidental. It’s all by design. The worst part being, the establishment think they are bullying everyone into submission, but are in fact causing this country a very, very big issue. Anyone that believes Danny Tommo is a bigger danger to the public than a man that films children, is going to hell in a handcart. History and karma will not be kind to anyone complicit in this absolute shit show.

The big allegation was that she was investigating a nonce ring in the BBC or elsewhere. She died before Saville died and was exposed. Saville was protected by the top management at the BBC who would have been taken down with him.