Andy Burnham's wife has quit her job to follow him around in what's being called an "unofficial First Lady" role, despite Britain having no such position and nobody having voted for her to hold one. If that means she's now travelling the country and the world alongside the Prime Minister at public expense, that's a permanent paid holiday funded by taxpayers who never agreed to give her a job in the first place. She isn't in government and holds no public role whatsoever. There is no First Lady in this country. Get back to work like everyone else has to.

Bereavement leave? Like for when someone died?

Well I hate to break it to you, but the Quran specifically permits domestic violence. Mohammed may not have beaten his wives, but he was smart enough to know that forbidding it would be a deal breaker for his followers.

Mr Ikram is is a very dangerous and corrupt member of our weak woke judiciary. If there is a @reformparty_uk government in 2029 these people must be taken down….they have been undermining natural justice for decades.

Firing from civilian infrastructure? WAR CRIME. Firing without uniforms on? WAR CRIME. Firing indiscriminately? WAR CRIME.

Detectives have launched a fresh investigation into the unsolved murder of Jill Dando. There have been many theories about her murder. Who do you think killed her and why?

I think we can all agree that Ash Sarkar is effing ugly?

Having a fertile imagination, I can imagine a group not dissimilar to Patriot Platform finding out where certain judges reside and protesting outside, possibly even forcing them into hiding. It will elicit stern condemnations from the PM, various luminaries and pompous Times columnists (none of whom have ever uttered a peep about a certain Batley teacher). They will lecture the public on the rule of law while they continually throw the book at dissenters - while there'll be no noticeable change in the number of violent offenders and nonces walking free. I imagine this will not be very well received by the great unwashed, who will find such moralising from the establishment to be, shall we say, unconvincing. I wouldn't even be surprised if court cases themselves were disrupted when certain cases are brought before certain judges. This will, of course, be denounced as "far right thuggery". This is the point where society begins to fall apart, because law and order is only held together when the machinery of the state has legitimacy and moral authority. You can immediately see the problem here. We have a government that virtually nobody wants, a system that is adept at freezing out challengers, biased and corrupt courts, two tier justice, and a politicised police force that has completely lost the respect of the public to the extent that it is little different to an occupying force. Consequently, normally law abiding folks such as myself, will not find much sympathy for the powers that be. I don't believe that Danny Tommo is far right, and at this point, I don't particularly care if he is. His views are closer to my own than seemingly any sitting judge, who will place the rights of paedophiles and rapists ahead of our right to safety. This, in case you were unaware, puts us on a trajectory towards civil unrest. The justice system is corrupted and incoherent beyond repair, and can only win back the confidence of the general public when its verdicts reflect the values of the law abiding. If judges are the ones seen to be causing more harm than "far right thugs" then the social contract is dead. Since the powers that be are incapable of acknowledging their role in bringing this unhappy situation about, it can only escalate from here, and I know of nobody in a rush to condemn it. I certainly won't.

What the fuck. Just watch it.

A Jew became Muslim. He regretted it. He went back to Judaism. Muhammad was alive. His governors in Yemen, Abu Musa and Mu‘adh, had the man tied. Mu‘adh refused to sit until they killed him. “The verdict of Allah and His Apostle.” They killed him. Bukhari. Not a rumor. Then they recite: no compulsion in religion. The compulsion was not at the door. It was at the exit.

Tan Ikram again.

🚨NEW: Judge Tan Ikram CBE, the judge who denied Danny Tommo bail and said he was "satisfied there is a real possibility of an immediate custodial sentence", has a history of being placed in politically motivated cases. . Sentenced a man to 20 weeks in jail for posting a racist joke in a WhatsApp chat. . Let off the OnlyFans girl who threw milkshake at Nigel Farage. . Let off two women for terrorism charged after glorifying 7 October massacre. . Was himself given a disciplinary after liking a post on LinkedIn that stated Israel was a terrorist state. Although obviously not a crime, it did bring into question his impartiality. . He was given a CBE by Boris Johnson in the 2022 New Year Honours for services to judicial diversity. He has spoken out about what he sees as the problems due to the lack of ethnic diversity in the police and the judiciary.

Notice how it's always blackmail with these people. It's never "Vote for us because we have the people, policies and knowhow" (because they don't). It's always "Vote for whatever slop we serve you or the left wins".