Exploring Base Network 🟦 + AI video tools 🚀 Simplifying Crypto, DeFi, and DeSci 🧪 Passionate about curiosity, meaning, and long-term value. 🌎

Earth 🌍🌎🌏
🧪 Just finished a personal passion project for @ResearchHub — Something I made because I believe open science will accelerate science, thus accelerating humanity and benefiting all.🌎 "The future is not guaranteed, It is built by us." $RSC is now LIVE on @coinbase Let's build together. 🟦
7
20
122
9,613
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
🚨Important information: We’re preparing the airdrop for eligible wallets—and there’s still time to qualify for holder benefits. The pre-$100K campaign has ended, but our contribution-tier campaign remains open until the raise reaches $200K. Your total contribution determines your tier: • $1K+: Bronze VIP • $5K+: Gold VIP • $10K+: Platinum VIP Eligibility is based on your total contribution before the raise reaches $200K, before any reductions or refunds due to oversubscription—not your final retained allocation. Each tier will unlock corresponding features and soulbound benefits. Planned benefits for soulbound NFT and token holders include NeuroLab app usage credits and governance on future IP-NFTs. Our Founders’ Club holders will receive the highest priority across the NeuroLab ecosystem.
We are doing the final tweaks and fixed to the Ignition founder collection to be airdropped ASAP.
6
5
15
1,268
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
Associate Professor at @USCGero, @BBParis1984, is raising $10K on ResearchHub to test promising anti-aging drug candidates directly in human ovarian cells. The project is already 32% funded. Help get it across the finish line. Fund the research. 🧵
1
10
22
1,304
This is such an undertalked-about frontier. If we’re going to extend human life and build a more advanced future, we also need to understand the mind itself: focus, awareness, memory, reasoning, and what allows us to live with clarity. Higher intelligence matters, but higher awareness may be just as important. At some point, humanity has to grab the steering wheel of its own evolution.
I'm hosting a dinner next month in Boston for scientists and engineers interested in safely increasing human intelligence. I'm interested in both treating cognitive impairment and helping healthy people improve their cognitive abilities. Could we develop treatments that help people learn faster, reason better, and solve harder problems? I'm especially interested in approaches that could work in adults. There's a lot we don't know, including what's possible and what would be safe. I'd like to bring together people across neuroscience, genetics, drug development, and computational biology/ML to discuss promising research and what it would take to turn it into useful treatments. I'm also interested in backing the right founding team if one comes together. If you're working in this area or have relevant expertise, please apply at the link below. Happy to cover travel if needed. Or if you can't make it to Boston, let us know - I may host one virtually for those who can't attend in person.
5
220
Can you tell me what happens when $RSC breaks resistance of a weekly downtrend @cobie
2
10
333
We need more founders like Brian and Elon in the world!
I'm passionate about accelerating science and tech to help solve some of the biggest challenges in the world. To further this, I'm planning to sell about 2% of my Coinbase holdings over the next year to fund scientific research and companies like @newlimit + @researchhub
9
297
The future isn't guaranteed.... It's built by us
🧪 Just finished a personal passion project for @ResearchHub — Something I made because I believe open science will accelerate science, thus accelerating humanity and benefiting all.🌎 "The future is not guaranteed, It is built by us." $RSC is now LIVE on @coinbase Let's build together. 🟦
6
161
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
$150 per peer review, paid to the reviewer. Every review public. Turnaround averages about 10 days. One live test of an alternative to gatekeeping review. One unsolved part: hiring and grant committees still count papers.
If it's isn't obvious already, it is the end of papers as a measure of productivity, expertise or accomplishment. The odds of publishing in "glam" conferences & journals also very quickly approaches random & the time for gate keeping review increasing exponentially. 1/
1
3
17
2,752
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
Reminder that you can earn $RSC on @ResearchHub by contributing to science - Write peer reviews - Answer scientific questions - Submit interesting pre-prints One professor in Brazil told us they are earning more writing peer reviews on ResearchHub than in their day job.
Congratulations to @brian_armstrong and @joycesticks’ @ResearchHub on crossing $1.00 / token ($RSC). Big milestone in advancing the pace of open science and the incentive for all to contribute. 🧬 📈
56
109
654
162,151
This is the way!
This is the future we shall bring into being
86
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
> Apply for funding with a preregistration > Incentivize peer review as feedback, not gatekeeping > Publish funded proposals as registered reports > Publish null alongside positive results
Replying to @anshulkundaje
I'm requesting all scientists in academia especially to seriously consider, discuss & test alternative approaches instead of shoving our heads deep in the ancient sands desperately clinging on to the old system. 4/
4
26
2,030
So glad that Elon purchased X
Here we go again! The WSJ is working on a story blaming Coinbase and me personally for the CLARITY Act not passing. The Journal has repeatedly been hostile to CLARITY in its reporting, regurgitating bank lobby talking points, while I’ve spent years pushing for crypto legislation, but that’s not stopping them from trying to reverse the blame. The boring TLDR: in January I opposed a draft of the bill going into a committee vote, because it needed a lot of work on DeFi, tokenization, CFTC authority, and stablecoin rewards. At the time, the bill had major issues that would have harmed crypto. Support was fractured, and it wasn’t passable. We worked with a number of parties who improved the bill and made it passable. All four of the items I called out were fixed in the draft that then went through the committee about four months later. I'm proud to have done it, and would do it again, because it helped create a better bill. One step of many along the way. The final draft of CLARITY that went to the Senate was great, and I strongly supported it. I'll continue showing up for our customers and pushing for clear rules that treat crypto fairly, even if those who feel threatened by crypto try to plant false stories. It's a shame that the WSJ takes direction from bank lobbyists instead of reporting the truth, but luckily, people are smart enough to see through it these days, and it backfires on them every time.
86
scottexplores.base.eth retweeted
LIVE: JEFFREY KOURY President of ResearchHub Science is going onchain. Tune in. nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1OxwbnOoz…
8
17
47
206,444
Science 🤝 Crypto
LIVE: JEFFREY KOURY President of ResearchHub Science is going onchain. Tune in. nitter.net/i/broadcasts/1OxwbnOoz…
1
7
505
Well this didn't age well
Bad day to be a Clarity Act doomer.
114
Well I guess I know who I'm not voting for
🚨NEW: The Clarity Act has failed to advance in the Senate after falling short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture. It did not even secure 50 votes.
94
This is probably your last chance to own $RSC before it teleports to .15 - .20 and trust me it will be fast
5
177