The question you now have to ask… Who told this Dominion employee that he needed to commit 100 felonies to make the recount match? At least 8 counties did the same.

HE READ THE SETUP. THE JUDGE WROTE THE ENDING: Tuesday afternoon, @RobGouveiaEsq read the entire hearing transcript in my client's case against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson out loud. All 23 pages. In character. Grateful for the continued attention to the case. A few hours after Rob recording, the judge ruled. THE CASE IN 30 SECONDS Benson's rule: delete the electronic poll book records 7 days after certification. Federal law: keep them 22 months. Destroying them early is a federal crime. A township clerk asked the State which law to follow. Eleven months. No answer. So she sued. Benson asked the judge to throw it out. WHAT ROB READS, FROM THE CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT The State's lawyer, asked about the merits: "You're not going to hear a merits argument from me." (p 11) The judge, when the State said keeping records costs too much: "You're arguing practicalities. But you know what? I have to comply with the law." (p 11) The State, on what every other clerk in Michigan did with their records: "All the other jurisdictions have presumably purged their materials." (p 13) The judge, a former federal prosecutor, on the State's "nobody's been charged in 14 years" defense: "This is a new DOJ, different from the DOJ that I think I worked for." (p 8) The State's lawyer: "That's true, Your Honor." And for the record, the lawyer who walked in late was not me. That was the State's second attorney. I was at the podium, on time. HOW IT ENDED Hours after Rob stopped recording, the judge denied Benson's motion on every ground and kept the order protecting my client's records in place. Footnote 3 calls the State's position "quite remarkable and reckless." Footnote 5 says the suit "could derivatively save the SOS from being criminally charged federally." Rad it yourself: Hearing transcript (Sept 16): tinyurl.com/pollbooktranscri… Full opinion (Sept 22): tinyurl.com/pollbookruling Let's make Michigan safe, normal, and responsible again! 🇺🇸 @MIGOP @MI_Republicans @Th_Midwesterner @MINewsSource @stevegrubershow @MrJustinBarclay @JonathanTurley @RobGouveiaEsq @downi75 @Mike_Cox @MrAustinPredict @gatewaypundit @honestpollster @mifairelections @dcexaminer @MZHemingway @jsolomonReports @laralogan

🚨 This is critical- and one of the most important points that is well known to many of us- @jeffmfulgham has factually established. It WILL unravel from here. Dominion technicians who were working late and on weekends in Georgia during holidays in 2020- WE SEE YOU.

BENSON ORDERED CLERKS TO DELETE ELECTION RECORDS. A CLERK SUED. BENSON ASKED A JUDGE TO THROW IT OUT. TODAY HE SAID NO. ON EVERY GROUND. THE CASE IN 30 SECONDS The electronic poll book is the laptop record of everyone who checked in to vote at your precinct. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's new state rule says clerks must DELETE it 7 days after the election is certified. Federal law says KEEP it 22 months. Destroying it early is a FEDERAL CRIME. My client, Bridgewater Township Clerk Michelle McQueer, asked the State which law to follow. ELEVEN MONTHS. NO ANSWER. So she sued. WHAT HAPPENED TODAY: - The Court of Claims denied the State's motion to dismiss. COMPLETELY. - The State said she waited too long. DENIED. The court: it "cannot fault plaintiff for waiting." The power to answer her "was completely in their hands." (pp 19, 21) - The State said she skipped the process. DENIED. The court: it "will not support defendants delaying in resolving the administrative proceedings and then fault plaintiff for filing suit." (p 19) - The State said a clerk can't bring this case in any court. DENIED. The court: she sued "to ensure that she ... complies with state and federal law and therefore will not be criminally charged." That's not the kind of case the State's cases are about. (pp 21-22) - And the order protecting her records STAYS IN PLACE. WHAT THE JUDGE WROTE: The State said criminal liability is "speculative" because DOJ hasn't prosecuted anyone yet. The judge, in Footnote 3: "The Court finds this contention to be quite remarkable and reckless." And Footnote 5: "Plaintiff's suit also could derivatively save the SOS from being criminally charged federally." READ THAT ONE TWICE. FROM THE HEARING, SEPTEMBER 16: - To the State's lawyer, first sentence: "Off the top, you lose on the laches." (p 5) - When Benson's lawyer argued the burden on the State: "You're arguing practicalities. But you know what? I have to comply with the law. I have to follow the law." (p 11) - On calling out the State's specious claim that a clerk can't bring this case: "I'm with you on that. You're right." (p 16) - The State's own lawyer, on the record: "You're not going to hear a merits argument from me." (p 11) WHAT'S NEXT: The State now has to defend the rule on the merits, which it has AVOIDED SINCE THE START. Benson's lawyers promised in court to issue rulings on her requests within two weeks. Once those land, both sides file, and the judge decides whether a state rule can order clerks to delete what federal law says to keep. ONE CLERK. TWO LAWS. A JUDGE WHO READS AND CARES ABOUT THE LAW. Full opinion (Sept22): tinyurl.com/pollbookruling Hearing transcript (Sept 16): tinyurl.com/pollbooktranscri… Let's make Michigan safe, normal, and responsible again! 🇺🇸 @MIGOP @MI_Republicans @Th_Midwesterner @MINewsSource @stevegrubershow @MrJustinBarclay @JonathanTurley @RobGouveiaEsq @downi75 @Mike_Cox @MrAustinPredict @gatewaypundit @honestpollster @mifairelections @dcexaminer @MZHemingway @jsolomonReports

This practice is only effective with regard to the State Election Board because Chris Carr @Georgia_AG refuses, and has refused- to represent-or provide representation for board members. In doing so he places them in jeopardy - personally- thereby allowing organizations, like American Oversight @weareoversight, to take the board hostage. For example- in a coordinated attempt to perform a fait accompli and kill complaint SEB2023-025 (the subject matter of which is currently under federal criminal investigation), SEB Chairman John Fervier "continued" the second day of the July 2024 SEB meeting to an undefined future date. Three board members knew he was, once again, attempting to obstruct the investigation of 025 (and other business of the board) so they exercised their statutory authority and called an emergency meeting for which GA law requires posting public notice 24 hours in advance. The requisite form signed by three members (GA law only requires two) was provided to the Chairman and SOS's General Counsel Charlene McGowan to post on the SOS's website (where board meeting notices are posted)- but Charlene and the Chairman refused to post the notice. Even though GA law does not explicitly require posting notice of an emergency meeting on a website- and notice was posted on the door as required- the Chairman publicly claimed that the meeting was illegal- citing Chris Carr @Georgia_AG. American Oversight sued the board (and the three members in their personal capacities) for holding a meeting of the board which they claimed was illegal for failing to post notice on the website. The SOS's General Counsel Charlene McGowan, and SOB Chairman John Fervier- intentionally and knowingly prevented and prohibited the meeting notice from being posted on the website. @Georgia_AG Chris Carr, AAG Elizabeth Young, GC McGowan, and SOB Fervier have sat quietly and watched as the board was excoriated in the media and sued for something they caused. The lawsuit is still pending- yet these attorneys have, among other things, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and duty of candor. Some (rhymes with "dis bar") have IMHO committed malpractice as they are knowingly failing to represent their client- the SEB. Tomorrow, I'll tell you about another predatory American Oversight lawsuit against Dr. Johnston who @Georgia_AG Chris Carr refused to represent or defend. The damning part about that one is that it was caused (perhaps intentionally) by a SOS employee, Alex Hardin. The AG represents the SOS- in addition to the SEB. See how that works, folks? Caused by one client- yet refuses to represent the client being sued for something that was through no fault of her own (it's almost (certainly) like Dr. Johnston was set up). Chris- remember- truth is an absolute defense -and you're all out. @JeffClarkUS @EagleEdMartin

This practice is only effective with regard to the State Election Board because Chris Carr @Georgia_AG refuses, and has refused- to represent-or provide representation for board members. In doing so he places them in jeopardy - personally- thereby allowing organizations, like American Oversight @weareoversight, to take the board hostage. For example- in a coordinated attempt to perform a fait accompli and kill complaint SEB2023-025 (the subject matter of which is currently under federal criminal investigation), SEB Chairman John Fervier "continued" the second day of the July 2024 SEB meeting to an undefined future date. Three board members knew he was, once again, attempting to obstruct the investigation of 025 (and other business of the board) so they exercised their statutory authority and called an emergency meeting for which GA law requires posting public notice 24 hours in advance. The requisite form signed by three members (GA law only requires two) was provided to the Chairman and SOS's General Counsel Charlene McGowan to post on the SOS's website (where board meeting notices are posted)- but Charlene and the Chairman refused to post the notice. Even though GA law does not explicitly require posting notice of an emergency meeting on a website- and notice was posted on the door as required- the Chairman publicly claimed that the meeting was illegal- citing Chris Carr @Georgia_AG. American Oversight sued the board (and the three members in their personal capacities) for holding a meeting of the board which they claimed was illegal for failing to post notice on the website. The SOS's General Counsel Charlene McGowan, and SOB Chairman John Fervier- intentionally and knowingly prevented and prohibited the meeting notice from being posted on the website. @Georgia_AG Chris Carr, AAG Elizabeth Young, GC McGowan, and SOB Fervier have sat quietly and watched as the board was excoriated in the media and sued for something they caused. The lawsuit is still pending- yet these attorneys have, among other things, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and duty of candor. Some (rhymes with "dis bar") have IMHO committed malpractice as they are knowingly failing to represent their client- the SEB. Tomorrow, I'll tell you about another predatory American Oversight lawsuit against Dr. Johnston who @Georgia_AG Chris Carr refused to represent or defend. The damning part about that one is that it was caused (perhaps intentionally) by a SOS employee, Alex Hardin. The AG represents the SOS- in addition to the SEB. See how that works, folks? Caused by one client- yet refuses to represent the client being sued for something that was through no fault of her own (it's almost (certainly) like Dr. Johnston was set up). Chris- remember- truth is an absolute defense -and you're all out. @JeffClarkUS @EagleEdMartin