👍 law, menswear, @pontifex | 👎 bad ties, schism | omnicause centrist | "like a young Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch" —Juror No. 2
- Tweets 37,923
- Following 4,919
- Followers 2,252
- Likes 298,106
This is not true unless by "written by a human and edited by AI," you mean "hey Claude I want to say x. Please turn this into a blog post or w/e."
1
1
282
Here's an example. I asked ChatGPT to explain the rule against perpetuies in Anglish. It followed my instructions, and superficially this does not sound like LLMese. But...
2
1
41
It sure seems like you're talking about a scenario where someone made an advance directive for MAID and doesn't want to die, and you say that there's nothing hard about that situation.
1
1
37
It seems to work by making the input worse. (pic 1 is an annoyingly LLM-y but basically comprehensible and correct argument. the highlighted portion of pic 2 is gibberish.)
2
116
I'm surprised I haven't seen more discussion of how incredibly bad Astra is at ASCII diagrams and how much it loves making them
1
2
221
VIBE (2026) — a heart-wrenching exploration of one lawyer's addiction to generative coding tools. Coming soon to theaters near you!
14
426
Part 1 is a very very good answer
Not sure about part 2 even though I get where you're coming from.
4
268
Bad misreading. The article explicitly tells us that Najya didn't test into the specialized high schools. The other selective public schools do not use testing. They use a combination of grades (given, in this case, by the inadequate middle school) and essays.
1
9
122
Remarkable from start to finish. Here is a student you think is smart enough to have a shot on the g&t screening test, and she intentionally bombs the test and laughs about it. And you think that supports your point that students like her can never fail, they can only be failed.
1
14
468
Where do you see Prof Sassoli saying that? What I find instead is him saying the "key question" is whether Hezbollah members were legitimate military targets, and he seems to think they are.
1
7
148
Dual 21:9 ultrawides on an XL arm that can reach my lounge chair if I don't want to sit at my desk. (Pay no attention to the mess. I'm redoing my office.)
1
78
This argument is ridiculous. We have still have tortious interference with contract! Why should a marriage receive less protection than a vending machine supplier agreement?
1
3
19
399
You could have affidavits from Jesus Christ, the Buddha, and George Washington declaring that they personally saw you write it. I don't care, because this is grade-A turbo-charged LLM slop on stilts.
2
35
I really think you are using "permanent" in an idiosyncratic way, and it's making it hard to understand your argument.
1
21
It's not practically permanent. It's (1) at most until the student turns 24 and (2) changeable at any time by supporting oneself.
1
29
I think Claudish has shown me a new kind of aesthetic experience? The mental sensation of bouncing off a piece of awful LLM prose is entirely its own thing. It's a little bit like taking a Benadryl
i really cannot stress this enough, please, for the love of God, write your project's documentation in English, not Claudish
4
329
(1) so what? (2) The NYT also spoke to a speech pathologist who'd worked with him. (3) how many flagrant, high-profile lies would it take for us to agree he was a serial liar? I'm happy to work through them one by one.
1
1
15
Was this?
The idea that the people exposing lies and substandard work are to blame, rather than the people who tolerated it or were willfully blind to it, is backwards. It may not seem that way to you, but the people who propped Arday up wronged him. He was their victim.
1
7
1,015
