Awesome time with awesome people at @Redox in #Philly. Amazing company with #healthcare APIs. Thank you @ShereeseMayMba and @eileengadsden for meeting at @philamuseum Where’s @techguy ? #HCldr

Never forget Leg Day

SIRT6 Activation Improves Intervertebral Disc Health in the Aging Spine onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…

A hundred AI models but we can’t fix the iPhone autocorrect making you type the same word twice and then you have to delete the whole stupid thing and place the cursor manually. I don’t have time for this, I’m trying to drive.

Really?

Genius

This is like the Grievance Studies, but for @NateSilver538 and @FrankLuntz types.

🚨 NEW: For the @WSJ, @Hartz_PhD and I expose the ideological takeover of the American Psychological Association. The APA is facing the possible loss of its federal accreditation authority following allegations of widespread antisemitism. But while the APA's antisemitism problem is serious, it's only a symptom of a much deeper ideological rot. The organization has become so captured by radical left-wing political activism that its commitment to scientific objectivity competence is now in serious doubt. We examined the program for this year's major APA Division 39 conference, which drew nearly 800 attendees and held 90 panels over four days. By our count, roughly 70 of the 90 panels were overtly political, and always left-wing. Topics included abolishing the family, queer anarchist psychoanalysis, dismantling gender assessment guidelines, and white supremacy. One session even concluded with a drag show. There was at least some hope that the threat of losing federal accreditation might prompt some institutional soul-searching. It didn't. Instead, APA members just elected Candice Hargons as their next president. Her campaign identifies "systemic intersectional oppression" as the profession's "common enemy" and calls for rejecting the traditional scientific notions of objectivity. Psychologists wield enormous influence over vulnerable patients, and the people seeking treatment deserve the peace of mind knowing that the care they're receiving care is evidence based and not tainted radical politics. We believe most would agree that federal accreditation should actually mean something. If the APA cannot distinguish its scientific mission from its political activism, the Education Department should reconsider whether it deserves the government's endorsement as an authority over psychological training. Read our full essay in the Wall Street Journal below: 🔗wsj.com/opinion/the-inmates-…

A legal tsunami is heading for government. They system is not built to handle the volume of input that agents are now able to produce. Without new infrastructure, our institutions will be under permanent DDOS attack. Who wants to build this?

This is a massive Signal 🚨

AI gets faster and cheaper every few months. Trust in medicine doesn't scale like that. It's earned over decades, recommendation by recommendation, until a doctor at 2 AM can act on it with confidence. The future of medicine belongs to whoever brings the two together. So Doximity and Wolters Kluwer are partnering to bring UpToDate to Doximity Ask. Technology is at its best when it disappears and lets great doctors be great doctors. We're just getting started.

Someone is flexing 💪

I nominate @jamietsohn as Nostradamus for AI Native Law Firm Futures. 🎯🎯🎯

Almost the entirety of the British Highstreet is now made up of 3 types of businesses: 1) Private Equity owned companies (Pizza Express, Burger King, Cafe Rouge, The Body Shop, Wagamamas, Zizzi, New Look, Bella Italia, Boots, WH Smith, etc) 2) Foreign owned businesses acting as fronts for skilled visa migrant scams and/or money laundering enterprises (Hairdressers, Kebab Shops, Vape Shops, etc) 3) Charity Shops. Largely in existence to sell off items left when people die. It's difficult to imagine anything more dystopian than this.

Anthropic is asking law firms how lawyers negotiate: how they push hard for a client while still landing a "fair" outcome. Think about what that means. What's in your partners' heads are about to get embedded in a leading AI model and built into agents anyone or any agent can use. Three points: 1. My guess: agents will get very good at the functional side of negotiations. What they won't have is the capability to read the client - to tell how hard to push - to tell the client they are overly invested in a losing position or have the wrong goal. Having judgment about when to walk away, when to protect the business relationship, and when a client needs to hear 'no' are things that require context, reading people and the situation. 2. So this might not be a threat to really good lawyers. It is a threat to lawyers who never put in the EQ work with their clients. My guess is this will be for consumer negotiations with merchants not complex deals - but people will try nonetheless. 3. Finally: negotiating agents will create more work for human lawyers in the short term. Why? Every deal an agent closes raises a new question: did it have authority to agree to that? Someone has to draft the guardrails, and someone has to fight about it when they fail.

OPPORTUNITY‼️: @ycombinator will put $500K into your company and then spend 3 months making sure you don't waste it. Winter 2027 applications close in just 2 weeks. What you get: - $125K for 7% on a post-money SAFE - $375K uncapped SAFE w/ MFN - 3 months in SF with the partners - The YC alumni network - Demo Day with 100+ investors Fireside with @aplusk this year was 🔥 Who can apply: any startup, any stage, anywhere. Idea stage is fine too, they back founders with and without traction. Heads up, it's equity, not a grant, and the acceptance rate is brutal. But a scrappy last-minute application still beats the one you never sent. Deadline: Nov 2. Decisions by Dec 11. Apply 👉 ycombinator.com/apply

MIAMI AI SUMMIT IS SOLD OUT. AGAIN. 🔥 Sold out last year. Sold out again this year. Miami, you showed up! Building this community has been meaningful from day one. Seeing so many people come together around AI makes me incredibly proud of what we’re building here. To all our partners, thank you for believing in this vision and helping make it happen. To the entire eMerge Americas team, thank you for the work, care, and energy behind every detail. I’m grateful to build this with you. To everyone in the community who shared a post, invited a friend, made an introduction, or helped spread the word: you helped fill this room. And to our speakers, thank you for bringing your ideas, experience, and time to Miami. I can’t wait for the conversations ahead. October 23. Loews Coral Gables. Let’s make it count. 🚀 If you missed your chance to join us at the Summit, we’ll see you at eMerge Americas. There’s so much more ahead! P.S. The only way left to be part of this year’s Miami AI Summit is as an exhibitor. Want to showcase what you’re building? DM me! #MiamiAISummit #eMergeAmericas #MiamiAIHub

I’m calling BS on ⬇️

Truth bombs 💣 being dropped all over Legal AI

for those who are into this kind of thing, latest M&A boy (at the highest level) email disaster just dropped. @pop_tartlet @DietCoke_Esq

Catching the other side's fake citations is starting to pay. In Noland v. Land of the Free, the California Court of Appeal refused in 2025 to award the defendants sanctions, because they never flagged the fabricated citations and seemed to learn of them only from the court's order to show cause. On October 9, Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Flycatcher v. Ozmos (S.D.N.Y.) awarded $38,877.59 in fees and costs to the defense lawyer who investigated and reported his opponent's AI-hallucinated citations. She called it a "significant service" to the court and agreed that courts depend on lawyers to bring this stuff to their attention. Read the cites, y’all.