WOW, umm...this is kind of a huge deal. Complete stab in the back to sellers if true. Like holy shit, I didn't think seller sentiment could get any lower but this is taking money directly out of seller pockets.
BREAKING: We just sued Amazon over what we believe was a vast, ad-rigging scheme. We believe Amazon found a way to charge a few extra pennies to an enormous number of transactions, adding up to over $20 billion in illegal charges. This is about how something becomes a "Sponsored product." Amazon lets businesses bid to be "Sponsored" but it told businesses that the highest bid would only pay slightly more than the second-highest bid. For example: If you bid $1 to have your product “Sponsored” and the next-highest bid is $0.50, you should pay about $0.51. But we believe that Amazon would run the auction, see those bids, and then secretly raise the second-place price so it could charge the winner more. It was a gradual strategy based on concealment. Internal Amazon documents show they tested how much they could raise those hidden charges without advertisers catching on, then raised them more when businesses didn’t react, then gave false answers when businesses started asking questions. This is a case about affordability, fair competition, and basic honesty in the marketplace. My thanks to the big bipartisan team on this, from AGs across the country to the FTC.

Sep 1, 2026 · 12:43 AM UTC

25
11
167
49,337
Sort replies: Relevant Recent Liked
Replying to @michaelpatron0
We have definitely suspected this was going on whenever we got aggressive with bidding
7
366
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Google did the same thing; sure Facebook is doing something similar as well - still a horrible practice
1
6
359
Replying to @michaelpatron0
These schemes go all the the way to the top. Whatever it takes.
5
204
Replying to @michaelpatron0
For sellers interested in banding together to push back against this type of unfair and deceptive treatment by Amazon, consider joining @roc_coalition. As a former FTC attorney and congressional staffer, I co-founded this trade association to provide an avenue for sellers to engage in joint advocacy efforts with agencies, State AGs, and Congress. DM me with any questions!
Yesterday, @FTC and a state AG coalition sued Amazon for undisclosed ad fees, extracting over $20B from brands and 3P sellers. ROCC applauds this bipartisan stand against Amazon's unfair and deceptive treatment of 500,000 small- and medium-sized businesses perma.cc/ACS3-YU2P
1
2
429
Replying to @michaelpatron0
The wild thing is that I'm pretty sure all of this would be legal if they just didn't claim to be using a second price auction. It's not illegal for them to randomly set the price of their advertising, but it is if they say it's based on competition, but then lie...
2
169
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Guess who gets to pay for this lawsuit? Sellers do.
1
71
Replying to @michaelpatron0
What is happening?!
65
Replying to @michaelpatron0
And sellers like us will be paying for this lawsuit in increased fees etc.
12
Replying to @michaelpatron0
need a long term storage fee criminal investigation
19
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Google and Meta have been doing this forever as well. It's not really a well kept secret.
245
Replying to @michaelpatron0
I've only been in FBA for 3 years, but I've noticed that Amazon NEVER loses a penny... all costs are transferred to the Seller. They've screwed me every way imaginable and even some unimaginable.
1
62
Replying to @michaelpatron0
The FTC office is at: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Northeast Regional Office is located at One Bowling Green, Suite 318, New York, NY 10004 Let's send them some of our Amazon products as a thank you, huh?
15
Replying to @michaelpatron0
They’ll pay a few hundred million fine, sellers will see none of it, and life will go on
122
Replying to @michaelpatron0
$16 billion in fine (peanuts to amazon) and business as usual.
284
Replying to @michaelpatron0
I like that the states sued to get the money sellers got robbed of
102
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Dont pretend you didnt suspect this to be the case. I remember it being the first question i asked the ad account manager and they totally fudged the answer. But i took it as just being the price of doing business 🤷‍♂️
57
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Its monopoly, it could get away with what it wants, Amazon basics should be illegal
89
Replying to @michaelpatron0
It's not even surprising. In a previous encounter with Amazon Fresh, I saw them fabricate fees and and steal thousands from a client. When presented with their own reporting showing that they owed money to the client, they went in and changed the reports on their end.
13
Replying to @michaelpatron0
If the sellers feel this way just imagine the affiliates.
298
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Looking forward to getting my $50 check from the settlement amount lol.
1
152
Replying to @michaelpatron0
Blow after blow for sellers after many DTC brands had to switch to Amazon after CPMs went up post 2021 Lack of trust with Big Tech has to be close to all time highs in e-com
1
26
Replying to @michaelpatron0
I was sure this was happening how else would i be paying sometimes 7$ per click on certain small volume words
47
Replying to @michaelpatron0
There was a reserve price. Don’t clear the reserve and the ad isn’t show. The advertisers never paid more than first price (willingness to pay) and the reserve price that made the ad worth more than organic results. Without a reserve you’d see more irrelevant ads.
1
61
Replying to @michaelpatron0
HUGE
6