This is a case of huge importance for union members, who need to know if they pay their subs only so that activists can decide their worthiness for basic employment help, based on whether or not they share the same personal biases and preferences as union gatekeepers.
What is a trade union for, if not to stand beside its members when they need it most? “Peggie’s claim hinges on the alleged failure of her union to advise her that she had legitimate grounds for a legal claim against her employer while she was suspended, and the RCN’s refusal to provide formal legal assistance when she made a secondary claim against NHS Fife over their handling of her disciplinary case.”
The RCN describes itself as a trade union that provides members with advice, representation and specialist legal support on workplace issues, including discrimination. Its own governance says the RCN Council must consider members’ interests and concerns and ensure the union acts lawfully.
A union does not have to agree with every belief held by every member. But members should be able to expect fair treatment, proper advice and representation based on the merits of their case, not whether their lawful beliefs are fashionable or approved of.
That is the issue at the heart of Sandie Peggie’s case against the RCN. And nurses across the country should be watching closely.