๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐: "๐ ๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐"
Miranda Devine was close enough to Tucker Carlson that he asked her to write his biography. She was halfway through it when he left Fox. She was on his show constantly. She knows him.
And she does not recognize what he has become.
Her explanation is worth hearing โ because it is charitable, honest, and ultimately more damning than any partisan attack could be.
Tucker started in journalism working for Bill Kristol in the neoconservative world. He was young, charismatic, a gifted writer, great on air. And he believes Kristol used those gifts to prosecute the case for the Iraq War โ a war Tucker later concluded was a catastrophic mistake. He had a friend die there. He beats himself up about it constantly.
That guilt is real. That anti-war conviction that grew from it is genuine. And Devine is right that Tucker is not alone โ a whole generation of conservatives, Pete Hegseth among them, came out of the Iraq era deeply skeptical of military intervention and the people who sold it to them. I've said as much. The skepticism itself is not the problem.
๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐'๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ .
At Fox, Tucker had an exceptional team around him. Executive producer Justin Wells โ described as first among equals in Fox behind-the-scenes talent. A retinue of genuinely gifted people who took Tucker's immense natural ability and turned it into the number one cable news show in America. You do not achieve that without excellent editorial judgment surrounding you, challenging you, sharpening you.
When Tucker left Fox, he could not keep those people. And now, according to someone who knows him well and has no axe to grind, ๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐.
That word matters. Isolation is how talented people go wrong. It removes the friction that produces good judgment. It removes the trusted voices that say โ wait, think about this differently. It removes the editorial check that separates a genuinely great broadcaster from someone platforming whatever confirms his existing worldview.
The Tucker Carlson who was brilliant on Fox was Tucker Carlson plus a world-class team that made him better. The Tucker Carlson who says he is rooting for Iran to win, who praises communist dictators, who questions whether H-m-s is a terrorist organization, who bought a home in Qatar and whose content is distributed by the Muslim Brotherhood โ that Tucker Carlson is isolated, nursing a decades-old wound about Iraq, and apparently surrounded by people who tell him what he wants to hear rather than what he needs to hear.
Devine's account does not excuse what Tucker has become. It explains it. And the explanation is in some ways sadder than the simpler version โ because it suggests a genuinely talented man who once did great work has been undone not by malice but by isolation, guilt, and the absence of people willing to push back.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ. ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ญ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ.
And there is only one person to blame for what comes out of Tucker's mouth, and that's Tucker himself.