If you have a sexual fetish and you cannot keep it within your private, personal realm but have to broadcast it or perform it in public and consequently compel others to participate in it unwillingly, then you are not ‘the good guy’. You are a narcissistic and misogynistic parasite intent on colonising womanhood in public and deserve every single word of criticism you receive. For what it’s worth, I have very similar views about anyone parading up and down the street wearing bondage gear and a strap-on dildo, even if this is in a so-called pride parade. No one, especially a child, needs to know that you like being chained up and having your cock whipped. Really, we don’t. If it gets you off, that’s fine but do it behind closed doors. Not only is this a reasonable and enlightened view, it is one that is shared by about 99% of the population. If you are AGP and you know you are, then if you fail to keep your fetish to yourself you’re not ‘the good guy’ either. If you are AGP and do not know it and carry out your fetish in public, you need to be told to fuck off back to your bedroom, or your cellar, or dungeon - or wherever else in private you get your kicks. The premise in your opening sentence is arrant nonsense (as well as grammatically incorrect - the word is ‘fewer’ not ‘less’). What is more, the issue isn’t one about ‘transition’ or ‘acceptance of trans ideology’ but the performance of a fetish in public with the non-consenting population. I for one (and I will not be alone) don’t give a rat’s arse whether a particular AGP either does or does not endorse gender identity ideology. If they don’t, that’s great - they can do so whilst not wanking in the women’s toilet dressed as their imagined idea of a sexy woman. If they do endorse it. then that’s just another piece of poor judgment.

JK Rowling could have used her platform to encourage millions of children to sterilise themselves but instead she just helped them to fall in love with reading. What a nasty Bigot.

A Drag Queen, a Pedophile, and an Antisemite walk into a bar. It's the bar at the BBC Studios. It's lunchtime.

So 3500 fuckwits out of 70000 voted for this bullshit.

RT @Howard_Lovy: There is a subgenre of books now from survivors of the October 7, 2023, massacre. I know that because I'm reading them for…

It will never stop being astounding that a bunch of men said “we are women!” and a bunch of people, including those in government, said “ok!” and then demonized any woman who said “well this is obviously bullsh-t.”

This demonstrates the difference between the legally and philosophically competent on one hand and the politically-motivated, philosophically vacuous and legally incorrect Jew-hating bigotry on the other.

Why do you feel an anthropological/psychogical approach rather than a biological one is the better way to categorise sports (or indeed anything else)

But no-one cares. Firstly, because gender is made-up bollox and ‘trans’ is mental illness, social contagion and/or male sexual fetish. And secondly because we organise society around sex, which is verifiable, biological reality. Your ‘peer reviewed research’ is activist slop.

And even if there were all these peer reviewed studies that proved gender as something distinct from sex, that wouldn't make men with a gender they associate with women into actual women. They're still men.

Nonsense.

If sex and gender are distinct, why do we keep being told that gender identity should allow entry into single sex spaces dedicated to the opposite sex? Why the big fuss over sex-segregated spaces? Why is gender conflated with sex as soon as it suits a certain demographic?

It is certainly not proven.

That distinction was made for philosophical purposes, not scientific or medical. It's sophistry.

I entirely agree with you, but I do think that we should seriously consider classifying “believing” that women have penises as a serious delusional disorder. It is clearly so detached from reality that it should be equivalent to claiming that you’re an ancient time traveller.

This is genius-level humour. Are you Ricky Gervais in disguise?

The most striking chart I’ve seen in a while

Map from 1950: note how Judea and Samaria are part of Jordan, Gaza is part of Egypt, and there's no "Palestine" to be seen anywhere. Under a 19 year long Arab occupation, no one thought of creating a new Arab state called Palestine.

I think the whole “disproportionate response” argument misunderstands how war actually works. The rule of war isn’t that if someone fires one missile, you’re entitled to fire only one missile back. Nor is it that if 1,000 people are killed, you’re limited to killing 1,000 in return. War isn’t a tit-for-tat accounting exercise. If a country invades you and launches a war that kills thousands, your objective is to end the threat and ensure it doesn't happen again. Try to minimize civilian deaths but not merely to proportionately match their body count. That’s the ugly reality of war.

Terrorism isn’t caused by Jews living next door. It’s a choice made by those who embrace violence over coexistence.

🎯💯 These people are pathetic, parroting clear bullshit straight from the Hamas PR department. Anyone with half a brain can see everything this pro-pally wankers spit is complete gargbage