The Second Amendment doesn’t end where J.B. Pritzker’s knowledge of firearms does.

DELETE. THE. REGISTRY. @ATFDirectorRC @AGToddBlanche

Sorry, Grandpa. Recent polls dropped and showed that majorities under 45 agree and want the Court to rule that the Second Amendment protects AR-15s. The reality is: “It looks scary” isn’t a constitutional test. Now SCOTUS has the opportunity to say the same in Viramontes.

Thank you to the representatives who are warning President Trump about this illegal gun registry, including @RepMichaelCloud, @Rep_Clyde, @RepBoebert, @RepEricBurlison, @RepShreve, @RepSheriBiggs, @RepMaryMiller, @RepDaveTaylor, @RepKatCammack, @RepSpartz, @RepEliCrane, @RepClayHiggins, @RepJohnMcGuire, @RepChipRoy, @RepRileyMoore, @RepScottPerry, @RepRalphNorman, @RepPatHarrigan, @RepBenCline, @WarrenDavidson, @RepClayFuller, @RepJohnRose, @DesJarlaisTN04, and @RepAndyHarrisMD.

🚨BREAKING🚨 24 Congressmen just sent an urgent message to @POTUS & @JDVance: "We write to alert you to an illegal national gun registry now containing 1,414,088,513 records of guns & gun owners... We ask for your decisive leadership to end this registry."

Congress banned a gun registry. ATF amassed a billion-plus firearm records anyway. Hackers have breached ATF systems, as well as other federal agencies. How long before those out-of-business records are accessed? Why wait for the next anti-gun administration to use the registry? Congress should destroy it today. Read the full report: ammoland.com/2026/09/congres…

The second amendment ain’t about duck huntin’

A right you have to apply for is not a right. 21 states still make you buy permission to carry. Fees, a class, a waiting period. And it buys them nothing. Violent crime in permit states runs near identical to the states that scrapped permits years ago. Both trending down, right along with the rest of the country. A country becoming more pro-gun on average by the day. Yet they still fight to keep this pointless system in place.

Read the Second Amendment again this morning, saw no mention of Congress having the power to institute even the most benign gun control. But I did see these words, "Shall Not Be Infringed."

UPDATE: the 2nd Amendment says "arms", not just guns.

Gun control punishes responsibility and rewards dependency.

They don't want you disarmed because you're dangerous. They want you disarmed because they are.

Gm… …to everybody except this tyrannical asshat. 1) They’re adults 2) They have rights 3) Fuck off and enjoy watching these bans fall nationwide

🚨BREAKING🚨 The Fifth Circuit just struck down the unconstitutional federal ban on purchasing handguns across state lines. “The Ban sullies the plain text of the 2A & is inconsistent with the nation’s tradition of firearms regulation, dating back to the founding era.”

DYK? Our reply brief in Ziegenfuss v. Martin, our TX Carry Ban Lawsuit, basically exposed many local orgs, restaurants, and sports teams for not knowing how to read. Want to know who can’t read and hates your rights in Texas? Check out the related press release. 🔗 👇

I was just subpoenaed in an anti-gun lawsuit...for being a guntuber. Link to the lawsuit is below. The case is Roberts v. Smith & Wesson, and it's the same playbook, almost copy+paste, of the Soto v. Bushmaster "Sandy Hook" lawsuit against Remington, which put them out of business. This one arises from the Highland Park July 4 shooting, where the killer used an M&P15. The plaintiffs are of course attempting to blame S&W for the incident and the theory, you guessed it, "negligent marketing." They say S&W appealed to young men interested in militaristic imagery and that this influenced the shooter to select the M&P15, and that this more or less was a cause of this incident. Insanity. Now they are reaching beyond S&W and into firearms media. I was served with a subpoena demanding years of info and analytics from me about S&W and reviews I've done. The part that should concern my fellow gun reviewers: Their subpoena defines an "Advertisement" to include even unpaid organic social-media content. In other words, by the plaintiffs' definition, even an independent review of a lawful product is "advertising," and they think they are entitled to any info that touches on essentially any YouTube video about the M&P15 during the relevant period. This is EXACTLY the end-run around the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that led me to draft what became the PLCAA Clarification Act. The PLCAA was enacted to protect manufacturers from lawfare over crimes committed by third parties. Plaintiffs have increasingly pleaded around that protection after the Soto case by using "negligent marketing" as a loophole, which defeats the purpose of the PLCAA. Versions of the PLCAA Clarification Act I wrote have now been enacted in West Virginia, Montana, and Kentucky. I've been told Kentucky has already dismissed a frivolous lawsuit with it. Consider contacting your legislators and looping me on on the email so we can keep the PLCAA Clarification Act passage rolling. Illinois obviously is not going to pass it. But Congress can. And whatever your politics on guns, there is a larger issue here: If a manufacturer sends a journalist or creator a product to independently test, that does not magically transform the resulting review into advertising. Treating independent editorial coverage as corporate marketing merely because someone reviewed a lawful product is a dangerous theory that reaches far beyond the gun industry. One final note for people in the gun media space: if you receive one of these subpoenas, do not ignore it and do not start deleting anything. Feel free to contact me and we can discuss whether I can assist with your response or coordinate with appropriate local counsel.

The Battle for Western Plaza Friday, May 1, 1992 Koreatown Los Angeles

The federal government is running a "secret FBI Program called NICS Monitoring" that is used to "track firearm purchases of Americans." Let that sink in for a moment.

🚨BREAKING🚨 GOF & @GunOwners just sued Oregon over its unconstitutional restrictions on nonresident carry. We’re taking Oregon to court because the Second Amendment protects the rights of ALL Americans. Your Second Amendment rights don’t disappear when you cross state lines.

It’s costing $750-$1000 to go through the new permit to purchase scheme in Colorado. To purchase a common semi auto rifle. Please do something about that.